On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Yep, I understand and your explanations are appreciated.
>
> We use the "moreinfo" tag at least during this intensive bug triage
> period for samba packages, to track down issues where we have
> requested bug submitters about old bugs still existing
> I'm not going to reopen this bug as I admit (considering its age and
> the fact that samba code was suffering a lot of changes at the time of
> submitting) it is likely to be fixed, and I know how to reopen a bug
> or submit a new one. My "complain", so to speak, is about the way this
> particul
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, Christian Perrier wrote:
> PS: using rude language does not help, imho. It even more deserves the
> content of the ideas you try to support. This is one of the golden
> rules of human communication: if your first words are aggressive
> towards people you're talking to, your id
Quoting Santiago Vila ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> > All these bugs are very probably away for a long time. We requested
> > more input from bug submitter but got none. Hence closing them...
>
> Hmm, you are a lazy maintainer. Compare (a) and (b) below:
Well, you're free o
Christian Perrier wrote:
> All these bugs are very probably away for a long time. We requested
> more input from bug submitter but got none. Hence closing them...
Hmm, you are a lazy maintainer. Compare (a) and (b) below:
(a) The user does not give enough information to reproduce the bug,
the bu
5 matches
Mail list logo