Quoting Santiago Vila ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Christian Perrier wrote: > > > All these bugs are very probably away for a long time. We requested > > more input from bug submitter but got none. Hence closing them... > > Hmm, you are a lazy maintainer. Compare (a) and (b) below:
Well, you're free of having such opinion. We requested for some input to a user who I perfectly know is still an active developer in the project. We got nothing, no answer at all. The bug we're talking about seems related to a very specific setup of your own. At least one minimal answer with "hmm, no time no answer right now, please don't close" would have been enough for us to keep the bug opened. > If you see a difference, please do not close bugs so gratuitously in > the future. I agree this may be a controversial issue and I leave other maintainers of the package, especially Steve whose advice is usually the Wise Advice we sometimes need, the decision to keep this bug closed or not. You also have this choice as bug submitter, by reopening it. In fact, closing it was an efficient way to trigger a reaction, it seems. I personnally won't play BTS war: if you reopen the bug, it won't be closed again. PS: using rude language does not help, imho. It even more deserves the content of the ideas you try to support. This is one of the golden rules of human communication: if your first words are aggressive towards people you're talking to, your ideas have a great chance to be ignored. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
