> I'm not going to reopen this bug as I admit (considering its age and > the fact that samba code was suffering a lot of changes at the time of > submitting) it is likely to be fixed, and I know how to reopen a bug > or submit a new one. My "complain", so to speak, is about the way this > particular bug has been handled since it was first reported, and what > exactly do we mean by "moreinfo". The bug didn't need "moreinfo" when > it was first reported. I did my homework, and provided everything a > normal maintainer could need to reproduce it, but even in such case I > was asked for "moreinfo". > > Can you understand at least why the word "lazy" came to my mind, even > if I did the wrong thing by explicitly spelling it in written?
Yep, I understand and your explanations are appreciated. We use the "moreinfo" tag at least during this intensive bug triage period for samba packages, to track down issues where we have requested bug submitters about old bugs still existing or not. So, we're on a bit of misunderstanding in general which is perfectly solved by this small mail exchange. Thanks for taking care answering again and, of course, feel free to report any other new bugs: we'll try to make you the promise they won't stay ignored next time..:-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
