Hi Sean,
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 10:42:37AM +0800, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Sun 15 Dec 2024 at 06:23pm +01, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > Whether logging is available no longer is a boolean. A container
> > runtime can provide a /dev/log service by forwarding to an external
> > logging serv
Matthew Vernon writes:
> D) The Technical Committee notes that logging daemons can now co-exist
> with each other. Therefore, their should stop conflicting with one
^
they
> another, and systemd-sysv s
Hi,
On 17/12/2024 02:42, Sean Whitton wrote:
On Sun 15 Dec 2024 at 06:23pm +01, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Thanks for your comments. I had drafted A) to try and avoid being
prescriptive about the adoption of the systemd-journald-is-syslog
suggestion, but the result seems to have been too ambiguous
Hello,
On Sun 15 Dec 2024 at 06:23pm +01, Helmut Grohne wrote:
>> A) The Technical Committee affirms that it is reasonable for a package to
>> declare any suitable dependency upon the system-log-daemon virtual package.
>> The Technical Committee suggests that Policy be updated to clarify this, an
Hi Matthew,
On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 02:02:12PM +, Matthew Vernon wrote:
>
> Here's a draft ballot; please suggest changes and/or say you're happy with
> it in the next couple of days, I (or someone else!) can call for votes on
> it.
Thanks for kicking of the drafting.
> ===8<===
> In Bug #1
Hi,
On Sun, 2024-12-15 at 14:02 +, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> The Technical Committee also
> acknowledges that on systemd systems, journald can serve the purpose of
> system-log-daemon, but that systemd also supports installing a separate
> system-log-daemon.
Does this mean that systemd shoul
Hi,
At the last TC meeting we concluded that we'd heard sufficient argument
on this issue to clarify the issues, and that we should therefore
proceed to a vote.
Here's a draft ballot; please suggest changes and/or say you're happy
with it in the next couple of days, I (or someone else!) can
7 matches
Mail list logo
