Hello Axel,
I am quoting your mail to document what we decided in our call
today, below. Basically we went back to "use dpkg-divert":
* Axel Beckert [220417 13:50]:
> There is one other possibility to provide that: Using dpkg-divert
> instead of update-alternatives with util-linux(-extra) shippi
Hi Chris,
sorry that we're slightly drifting away from the irqtop topic (I
nearly wanted to type "irqtopic" :-) to more general transition
topics. Feel free to tell me if you want to have this discussion
elsewhere. (I allowed myself to remove at least zhenwei from the Cc
for that reason.)
Chris H
* Axel Beckert [220418 02:21]:
> Thanks. Looks good to me now. I though suggest to slightly rephrase
> this sentence:
>
> Another variant of irqtop is found in the irqtop-nf package.
>
> I suggest to phrase it more like this:
>
> A different implementation of irqtop can be found in the irqt
Hi Chris,
> > * From src:util-linux's side the only thing left is that the package
> > shipping util-linux's implementation of irqtop needs to sport Breaks
> > and Replaces (not Conflicts) against "irqtop (<< 2.6-4~)".
> >
> > If you want, I can file a RC bug-report against the version in
>
Hi Axel,
* Axel Beckert [220417 13:50]:
> TL;DR: What if we just make util-linux-extra taking over the binary
> path /usr/bin/irqtop and the irqtop(-nf) package providing a binary
> name irqtop-nf in the future plus leaving the remainder to
> package descriptions and NEWS.Debian?
Thanks for the
Hi Chris,
TL;DR: What if we just make util-linux-extra taking over the binary
path /usr/bin/irqtop and the irqtop(-nf) package providing a binary
name irqtop-nf in the future plus leaving the remainder to
package descriptions and NEWS.Debian?
Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > Regarding the ruby-writt
Hi Axel,
* Axel Beckert [220415 17:53]:
> Hi Chris,
>
[comparison between irqtop variants, my thanks to both of you]
> Anyway, IMHO we should:
>
> * Figure out how to get the util-linux implementation into Debian
> proper.
>
> * irqtop from util-linux should in some way become the future de
Hi Chris,
Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > As far as I can see, I didn't get a reply back from you on these
> > suggestions of mine. Maybe my mail fell through the cracks. But I
> > think we should take the discussion up again, probably in this bug
> > report.
>
> Right. I think I forgot to reply ba
On 4/15/22 04:47, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
Hi Axel, zhenwei,
* Axel Beckert [220414 15:08]:
Since you're asking, I allow myself to cite my reply to your inquiry
with me back then (June 2021):
Thanks!
-
Hmmm, do they do t
Hi Axel, zhenwei,
* Axel Beckert [220414 15:08]:
> Since you're asking, I allow myself to cite my reply to your inquiry
> with me back then (June 2021):
Thanks!
> -
>
> Hmmm, do they do the same? Can I test that irqtop from ut
Hi Chris, hi zhenwei,
Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > The irqtop(from util-linux) command has better user experience:
> > - aggregate interrupt information seems clear on a morden server(128
> >CPUs or more).
> > - sort by several rules, include IRQ, TOTAL, DELTA and NAME.
> > - specify cpus
On 4/14/22 19:00, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
Hi zhenwei pi,
* zhenwei pi [220414 03:39]:
util-linux supports two new commands irqtop/lsirq since v2.36.
The related release note: https://lwn.net/Articles/826866/
The irqtop(from util-linux) command has better user experience:
- aggregate inter
Hi zhenwei pi,
* zhenwei pi [220414 03:39]:
> util-linux supports two new commands irqtop/lsirq since v2.36.
> The related release note: https://lwn.net/Articles/826866/
>
> The irqtop(from util-linux) command has better user experience:
> - aggregate interrupt information seems clear on a mord
Package: util-linux
Version: 2.36.1-7
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
util-linux supports two new commands irqtop/lsirq since v2.36.
The related release note: https://lwn.net/Articles/826866/
The irqtop(from util-linux) command has better user experience:
- aggregate interrupt information
14 matches
Mail list logo
