* Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org> [220418 02:21]: > Thanks. Looks good to me now. I though suggest to slightly rephrase > this sentence: > > Another variant of irqtop is found in the irqtop-nf package. > > I suggest to phrase it more like this: > > A different implementation of irqtop can be found in the irqtop-nf > package. Yes, that sounds better. Will do, thanks.
> I'm working on the accompanying irqtop and irqtop-nf package, but will > probably upload it only after a round of sleeping (aka "tomorrow" > despite it's already "tomorrow" in my time zone ;-). > > My work on it so far can be found on > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/iptables-netflow/ with most of it > being in this commit: > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/iptables-netflow/-/commit/85f7bb9ba685e7bfe5837c5aa476dfd8f5c3ec08 > > Also remember that it will have to go through the NEW queue due to the > additional binary package, i.e. it might take a week or so before it > shows up in experimental. > > > Would love your feedback on these changes. > > Not a comment on these changes, but still something I'm wondering > about: > > Why does util-linux have a hard dependency on util-linux-extra? This is for transitional reasons: hwclock (and some other less important bits) got moved to -extra. I want to avoid surprises for users that still need hwclock. After bookworm I'll replace Depends with Suggests/Recommends. Technically the Depends from irqtop to util-linux-extra is not needed. I think it still makes sense to have it, in case the relations between util-linux and util-linux-extra change before the release. Do you agree? Chris
