Hi Axel, * Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org> [220417 13:50]: > TL;DR: What if we just make util-linux-extra taking over the binary > path /usr/bin/irqtop and the irqtop(-nf) package providing a binary > name irqtop-nf in the future plus leaving the remainder to > package descriptions and NEWS.Debian?
Thanks for the analysis and suggestions! > [..] > * From src:util-linux's side the only thing left is that the package > shipping util-linux's implementation of irqtop needs to sport Breaks > and Replaces (not Conflicts) against "irqtop (<< 2.6-4~)". > > If you want, I can file a RC bug-report against the version in > Experimental due to its util-linux-extra package missing these > headers so far. > > * Optionally you could add a note in the package description of > util-linux(-extra) that the previously known, ruby-written > implementation of irqtop can be found in the package irqtop-nf. > [..] > I'd be happy if you could fix the missing Breaks/Replaces headers in > util-linux-extra. TIA! Both - the Breaks/Replaces, and the package description - are now in experimental, as src:util-linux / util-linux-extra 2.38-4+exp2. Would love your feedback on these changes. Best, Chris
