n I'm interested
in the configuration of the host that led to this, so that we can make that
path work better.
lamont
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 12:29:15PM +0100, James Cowgill wrote:
> On 11/03/17 16:32, Herwig Burgert wrote:
> > Package: postfix
> >
> > Versio
>
> This is what I get in systemctl status:
>
> ene 19 13:38:04 named[1020]: ENGINE_by_id failed (crypto failure)
Can you provide a named.conf that reproduces the issue?
thanks,
lamont
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 06:09:35PM +0300, Sergey Alyoshin wrote:
> Package: postfix
> Version: 3.1.3-6
> Priority: wishlist
> Tags: l10n patch
This file is unchanged from one that landed in the source tree on the 9th..
Was that intentional?
lamont
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 03:22:34PM +0100, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> $ grep lmtp /etc/postfix/master.cf
> lmtp unix - - y - - lmtp
Is there by any chance any trailing whitespace on that line?
lamont
reach my pcre map file.
Try 755 -- postfix is picky about world writable directories, iirc.
> Did you use postmap [1] to update the map?
pcre maps do not need postmap compilation (nor does postmap accept such
requests.)
The next thing to do would be to add some -v options (3 or 4 of them) to
the cleanup line in master.cf and see what it has to spew into the logs.
FWIW, pcre maps seem to work just fine for me in 3.1.3-4.
lamont
: 0.0.0.0
802.1q VLAN ID : Disabled
802.1q VLAN Priority: 0
Cipher Suite Priv Max : Not Available
Bad Password Threshold : Not Available
#
The iLo in question is configured with a static IPv6 address (though SLAAC made
no difference), and is quite reachable:
ssh -l lamont 2001
cv to return LWRES_R_IOERROR to
> lwres_context_sendrecv()
>
> This renders libnss-lwres useless.
Just to eliminate the obvious, please provide the output of
'sudo lsof -np :921'
from the machine??
The trace would be easy to explain if lwresd is not listening on that
port...
thanks,
lamont
in the package adds this
line, not just because it would violate Debian policy. Simply delete
these two lines from main.cf. For extra credit, figure out how they got
there in the first place. Since it was "fixing problem caused by package
maintainer", we can bet that it's not part of the packaging...
lamont
stfix/master[8473]: warning:
> /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd: bad command startup -- throttling
What revision did you upgrade from? and can you attach:
1) the contents of /etc/postfix/main.cf
2) the output of: postconf | grep directory
lamont
starters, what does mail.log have to say about the situation?
lamont
land
it in sid shortly.
lamont
be a "almost correct" diff for bug 786768. This will be fixed in
3.0.4-2
lamont
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 08:22:17PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 12.04.2012 18:51, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > [LaMont Jones]
> >* Link with and use sqlite when building dict_sqlite. add sqlite
> > dictionary to dynamicmaps.cf. Closes: #666950
>
fixed 3.0.3-2
--
3.0.3-2 has the migration code to properly rewrite dynamicmaps.cf to reflect
upstream changes when incorporating shared libraries and dynamicmaps.
lamont
/usr/lib/postfix/sbin
and then I'll be making sure that shlib loading doesn't get to traverse
into the subdirectory.
One way or another, I'd expect that to get uploaded before the weekend
is over. (Targetting Friday sometime, but I've learned to be
conservative in what I commit.)
lamont
the
archive mirror that is there.
Please fix the validator to allow hyphens in the tld_re.
The fix for <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25452#comment:2> appears to
be when this regression was introduced.
lamont
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
--
lamont
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:31:43PM +0200, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 09:19:26PM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 08:24:55PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > # we need libraries, and we need to be able to restart
> > /
Package: anope
Severity: wishlist
--
Please include the attached apparmor profile as part of the packge.
It should be delivered as /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.anope.
See also https://wiki.debian.org/AppArmor
thanks,
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:34:43PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 08:29:14AM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
> > Package: anope
> > Version: 2.0.2-1
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > If the daemon is not running, reload should fail. It cu
very intuitive, and takes some time to dig out, since it
errors out after the daemon forks...
Either the docs or source needs to change.
Workaround: For now, I just went with 'name = "services.log"', which
takes care of everything somewhat nicely.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
but I don't care either way on that part.
patch attached
lamont
>From ce09340e7c51f23c3e2b08b5e069355aa8eecdad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: LaMont Jones
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 08:16:06 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] add m_sql and m_regex_{posix,pcre} modules
---
debian/control | 2 +-
debia
Package: anope
Version: 2.0.2-1
Severity: serious
If the daemon is not running, reload should fail. It currently passes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
, since commas are treated as
whitespace by the parser. (They're completely optional.)
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
done automatically.
Postfix does, indeed REQUIRE that name resolution work on the machine.
Therefore, $named is the correct thing to require.
My next bit of investigation will be to look into what Provides: $named
when dnsmasq is NOT installed.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bug
I have
it uploaded to sid, and a diff sent to you guys.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
t's good, I
should be able to upload it tonight.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
0-1, and fixed in 2.11.1-1. All of
that is unrelated to propogation from sid. Having said that, you'll
notice that https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=750485
shows (top right corner) that the bug is fixed in sid, and present in
testing at this time.
All is as it should b
tag 741285 + moreinfo
--
I'll need someone with kfreebsd to provide a patch.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> +++ bind9-9.9.5.dfsg/debian/rules
> + install -m644 lib/isc/unix/errno2result.h debian/bind9/usr/include/isc
This feels wrong to me, and makes be believe that errno2result.h is not
intended to be delivered. Lets discuss this one a bit more, first.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
of #720813 which was marked
> fixed in 1:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-3 but as far as I can tell from looking at
>
> http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20130828T095519Z/pool/main/b/bind9/libbind-dev_9.9.3.dfsg.P2-3_amd64.deb
>
> wasn't.
>
> The bug is marked pending but I can
f through
> manual editing.
Correct. How would you suggest that I determine which one was set last?
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
terface.
I'm open to ideas on what to have bind9 depend on.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
load before the month is over,
but there is work to do in the meantime.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ying this function makes it work again.
Although, postmulti does seem to take the full-path directory as well as
the instance name, so this may make sense.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
it hit RC, but clearly
this has not happened.
Since it may take me a few weeks to get a package uploaded, I would
certainly welcome some team effort on this. I'll be working more on it
this weekend, I expect.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
sutils and bind9-host
> 5. Add an alternative mechanisms to knot-dnsutils and knot-host
> Would that work for you?
Seems reasonable. Would it be sufficent for bind9-dnsutils to
provide/conflict/replace dnsutils? or what were you thinking of there?
lamont
> * - I would even suggest to
machine
that has bind9 installed. Or are you saying that is not the case?
having bind9 Depend on ldap is a non-starter in my thinking.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
discovered and
configured.
The attached patch fixes the issue.
lamont
diff -ur x/iptables-1.4.18/libiptc/libiptc.c iptables-1.4.18/libiptc/libiptc.c
--- x/iptables-1.4.18/libiptc/libiptc.c 2013-03-03 14:40:11.0 -0700
+++ iptables-1.4.18/libiptc/libiptc.c 2013-06-03 16:03:31.819448019 -0600
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:28:31AM +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote:
> I have just uploaded nmap 6.25-0.1 to DELAYED/5:
Please go ahead and upload it to non-delayed. I'll get the source tree
caught up with the archive in the next week or 3.
lamont
> nmap (6.25-0.1) unstable; urgency=low
&
+networking +ifupdown
All of which makes me suspect that dnsmasq should not be required in the
boot process.
This feels more like an insserv issue to me, maybe?
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe&quo
ource and amd64 binaries are to be found at:
> > deb http://people.debian.org/~lamont/postfix .
> > deb-src http://people.debian.org/~lamont/postfix .
> Please go ahead; thanks.
Done
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
Per the IRC discussion, I have prepared postfix_2.9.6-2 for wheezy. Please let
me know when to upload it. The debdiff is below.
The source and amd64 binaries are to be found at:
deb http://people.debian.org/~lamont/postfix .
deb-src http://people.debian.org/~lamont/postfix .
lamont
smtpd_relay_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks
permit_sasl_authenticated
defer_unauth_destination
I need to review the rest of the release notes and see what else I need to
detect and deal with as part of an upgrade.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
10.0-1. Given Wietse's track record,
I'm inclined to just go with 2.10.0-1, but if the release team would
like 2.9.6-2 uploaded to tpu, I'd be happy to do so.
Just let me know.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &q
ty patch is available,
given how trivial and complete the workaround is.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
at 14 days in sid with no reported regressions
relative to -4.
Please consider unblocking it.
thanks,
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
generate the
dpkg-dist file in the general case.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Agreed. I've added the patch to 9.9.2-P1 (which I will upload to
experimental later today.) I have also started the discussion with the
release team about getting this into 9.8.4-P1 with bug 698658.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 03:11:42PM +0100, Peter Beck wrote:
> Having the same issue on a wheezy machine with Samba4.
> I'm also curious if this will be fixed for wheezy too.
The current plan is to have 1:9.8.4.dfsg.P1-3 migrate to wheezy.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
tag 690361 + moreinfo
--
It is not clear what exactly the change should be here, nor do I have
a machine to test it on.
If someone would like to propose a patch, I'd be happy to include it.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
d.root-servers.net changed IP addresses 2013-01-03, the old IP will go
away in "about 6 months".
lamont
=
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/chang
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 05:42:58PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 05:06:51AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> > fixed 697352 1:9.9.2.dfsg.P1-2
> > thanks
> I can't find this version. Has it been uploaded to unstable yet?
It'll be uploaded this week so
to the backport soon, if the security team doesn't beat me to it.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
wheezy,
it'll make the support life easier for the inevitable security fixes that
will follow. There are probably other reasons.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
t in the
> git repository for this package. I would really appreciate it.
I'm hoping to get 9.8.4.dfsg-1 uploaded today (wheezy-proposed) and
9.9.2 uploaded later this week to sid.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe
Package: postfix
Version: 2.9.1-5
--
When the package is upgraded, dynamicmaps_upgrade is queried, but never
created, so we skip adding sqlite to the maps list.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Package: dolfin
Version: 1.0.0-5
--
cd
/build/buildd-dolfin_1.0.0-5-ia64-LDjTpK/dolfin-1.0.0/obj-ia64-linux-gnu/dolfin/swig
&& /usr/bin/g++ -D_cpp_EXPORTS -DBOOST_UBLAS_NDEBUG -DHAS_SLEPC -DHAS_PETSC
-DHAS_UMFPACK -DHAS_CHOLMOD -DHAS_SCOTCH -DHAS_ZLIB -DHAS_MPI
-DMPICH_IGNORE_CXX_SEEK -DHAS_
Package: xserver-xorg-video-qxl
Version: 0.0.17-2+b1
--
CCLD libuxa.la
make[4]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd-xserver-xorg-video-qxl_0.0.17-2+b1-ia64-5fbY_J/xserver-xorg-video-qxl-0.0.17/build/src/uxa'
make[4]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd-xserver-xorg-video-qxl_0.0.17-2+b1-ia64-5fbY
Package: xserver-xorg-video-i128
Version: 1:1.3.5-1+b1
--
Fails to build with the following error:
config.status: executing libtool commands
dh_auto_build -a -O--builddirectory=build/
make[1]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd-xserver-xorg-video-i128_1.3.5-1+b1-ia64-h5rmfB/xserver-xorg-video-i
procmail -a "$EXTENSION"
and it was simply enforcing what you told it.
Maintaining a file with both debconf and vi is extremely problematic, and prone
to the admin discovering that he changed something in the wrong place.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ..
.)
I'm not planning to deliver useless old files.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
cts and Replaces: mail-transport-agent control
fields.
...
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 02:38:26PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012, LaMont Jones wrote:
> > Sounds great. Nmap hasn't been getting the attention it deserves from me.
> > I'll get some time to focus on this next week while I'm on a plane.
> F
us on this next week while I'm on a plane.
> > PS: In case you did not pay attention, there's also a security bug to fix
> > in this source package (see #663217).
> I'll take a look at that too.
Thanks.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: cricket
Version: 1.0.5-11
Tags: patch
The sample config defines bgcolor=white, but does not define white, resulting
in cpu graphs not displaying.
lamont
--- /tmp/Defaults 2011-11-16 12:32:57.0 +
+++ sample-config/Defaults 2011-11-16 12:23:47.0 +
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 11:13:29PM +0100, Norman Rasmussen wrote:
> Friendly ping?
Uploaded 1:9.8.1.dfsg-1 to sid yesterday.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
time this week, once I fix a couple of other bugs.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
than getting me even more
bug reports telling me what I already know.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
2.19.1 was just uploaded to experimental so people can play with it before
I actually upload it to sid.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
figuraiton only. See the section headed "Configuration Schema:" in
/usr/share/doc/bind9/README.Debian.gz
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
urs. (sleep is in there somehwere)
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:48:28AM -, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Hmm, LaMont, would it be possible for you to reupload with fixed PO
> > files (I think you just need to dig them out from the BTSthey have
> > probably been broken by the infamous mutt encoding bug)? This
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 11:57:52AM +0100, yellow wrote:
> then the client NFS has into /etc/fstab
> mount the NFS
> IP:/home /home nfs with here regullar parameters
What specifically does the line say (ignoring the IP address).
"regular parameters" has many posible meaning
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:05:06PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:43:45PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 03:42:11PM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> > That should be fine, thanks!
> What's the status?
fix-committed,
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 03:10:09PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> 1:9.7.2.dfsg.P3-1 unblocked.
Thanks - the specific patch for the first CVE was not forthcoming. And
the others just combined to make it more sensible to just unblock it, IMO.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-b
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:52:22PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Lamont, would it be possible to prepare an upload fixing just the
> > security bug for squeeze (so based on 1:9.7.1.dfsg.P2-2)?
>
> I looked into it a bit, but couldn't pinpoint the exact changes fo
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:38:41PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Lamont, are you fine with an NMU?
> This bug has been open for a long time and needs to be fixed for Squeeze
> soon.
I have another upload for util-linux that I'm planning doing late this week
or monday. (566072)
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:33:27PM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:48:30AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote [edited]:
> > I'll ponder this an get back with you on Monday (US time).
> and? what about my earlier proposal of using debconf only if it happens
it suffices to Depend on
> debconf (as opposed to pre-depend).
I've been trying to avoid _ANY_ debconf dependency in util-linux. I'll ponder
this an get back with you on Monday (US time).
> I'll consider a delayed NMU unless I hear from you real soon now.
Please wait.
lam
before (re)mounting the root filesystem. Moving it to /var, especially when the
primary motivation is have it not be on the root filesystem, is a non-starter.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
ot. Would that be sufficient for you?
> On the other side of the coin, I see no reason to fail to boot
> because a noauto filesystem didn't fsck.
It's more that a filesystem that fstab says to check failed to pass.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@list
> didn't specify sudo. Adding sudo in front of other commands, such as cat and
> ls still works with tab completion, so it still seems to be limited to mount
> and umount.
Not sure what is delivering tab-completion logic for mount, but it's not the
mount package. What shell are
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 06:03:16PM +0200, Hristo Erinin wrote:
> Oct 6 12:27:27 fury postfix/postqueue[19564]: dict_eval: expand
> $myhostname -> fury.localdomain
What is the output from these commands?
hostname --fqdn
grep ^127 /etc/hosts
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 10:04:26PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Julien BLACHE:
> > Bind9 9.6-ESV-R2 is available, with fixes for DNSSEC that can be
> > considered security patches [1].
> I would like to push that out to stable, either via security or
> proposed-updates.
tag 599081 + wontfix
--
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 10:56:21PM +0900, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
> It seems that bind9 package doesn't have watch file.
> I've written it, so please include this if appreciated.
That is correct. Can't stand the things myself.
lamont
--
To
t cases ok, but the hostname might have change in the meantime.
Postfix finds itself in the unfun situation of trying to keep people happy
regardless of whether they manually edit main.cf, or just use debconf.
As such, myhostname only gets set if /etc/hostname has changed, or we are
creating m
hered to do anything about it.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
n which case, reopening the old bug would have been even more appropriate.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Good point. OTOH, an actual bit of content in the bug would have
helped simplify the work of understanding what your issue was.
lamont
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 04:05:10PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Severity: serious
> Package: bind9
> Version: 1:9.7.1.dfsg-1
> User:
, which in turn made several systems
> unreachable.
Have you seen this with anything newer than 9.5.1?
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
the same on an older version(9.3.4-P1.2) it resolves properly;
Are you still able to reproduce this? There were some anomalies with the
nameservers for that zone when I looked earlier, but I do not see these now.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
wi
the option name to be
scary enough that end users don't think it's a good option to use in
daily life. I spoke with Colin Watson, and he suggested the option
be called --force-unsafe-io.
thanks,
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a sub
ecific
use case where it's beneficial, and I should really add documentation indicating
that it is generally the wrong answer.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tag 574490 + moreinfo
--
What exactly are you reporting, and what were you doing to get there?
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 03:57:56PM +0100, julien wrote:
> Package: postfix
> Version: 2.5.5-1.1
> Severity: important
>
>
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 5.0.4
> APT prefers stable
>
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 08:24:18AM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> This source package contains the following files from the
> IETF under non-free license terms:
Nice boilierpate bug. I thought I had gotten all of these, I'll deal with
the rest shortly.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
sb port with rw
> permission
The nearly certain situation here is that CONFIG_NTFS_RW is not set in the
kernel
config, resulting in the kernel doing read-only mode when mounting an NTFS
filesystem,
regardless of where it comes from.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
Package: llvm
Version: 2.6-4
Severity: wishlist
Version 2.2-12 at least built on ia64
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of llvm_2.6-4 on mundy by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20091229-1246
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by packa
rewriter.
How about some more detail?
what does /proc/mounts have? /etc/fstab ?
ls -la /media/dvd
as it sits, there is not enough here on which to render any opinion.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: kaa-imlib2
Version: 0.2.3-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of kaa-imlib2_0.2.3-2 on mundy by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20091204-2148
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: cdbs (>
1 - 100 of 755 matches
Mail list logo
