On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 03:26:59PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: > the Knot DNS 1.3.0 introduced knot-dnsutils and knot-host package(s), > so it would be nice if the two can coexist nicely in the system. > knot-dnsutils and knot-host provide kdig, knsupdate and khost binaries > that aim to be 1:1 compatible (with some backwards compatible > improvements) with Bind 9 commands. > > I propose: > 1. Rename dnsutils to bind9-dnsutils > 2. split obsolete nslookup to separate package[*] > 3. Create dummy dnsutils package > 4. Add an alternative mechanisms to bind9-dnsutils and bind9-host > 5. Add an alternative mechanisms to knot-dnsutils and knot-host
> Would that work for you? Seems reasonable. Would it be sufficent for bind9-dnsutils to provide/conflict/replace dnsutils? or what were you thinking of there? lamont > * - I would even suggest to drop nslookup since it has been obsoleted > long time ago. I'm inclined to drop it completely, and then readd it under duress as its own package, if someone notices. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
