On Sat, 9 Aug 2014, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Fri, 08 Aug 2014 21:14:12 +0200, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
Anyway, I'd really appreciate if Stuart, current maintainer, DD and
also upstream developer, jumped into the discussion and upload it
himself but seems quite unresponsive lately.
Ack.
Hi
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
The test would be to run one of the affected program under gdb, add a
breakpoint on __nptl_setxid, and understand why the memory access fail.
With gdb attached, the crash does not happen. I've got some more things
to try though.
I have access to a couple of these boards. I'll be glad to run some tests if
needed.
Stuart
Stuart R. Anderson ander...@netsweng.com
Network & Software Engineering http://www.netsweng.com/
1024D/37A79149:
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Do you know _why_ it fails in the first place?
Been a while 8-), but IIRC, this was a follow-on to bug #412032. If qemu
was made setuid root, then the env needed to be restored to get the right
behavior. If there is now another way of accomplishing s
rt of his response:
Saturday, 21 July 2012 at 15:45. Stuart Anderson
wrote:
If you want to send in the removal request, I'll acknowledge it and
confirm my consent for it.
So here is the confirmation. It makes me sad to let this one go, but it
really is time to let it pass into the great arch
On Wed, 30 May 2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Hi,
Debian FTP Masters wrote:
as the package lsb-build-cc3 has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.
[...]
For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/674792
Does this me
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Hideki Yamane wrote:
Hi,
op-panel cause build failure due to libswf-perl.
I made a simple patch for that, please check and apply it.
Thanks.
Hideki,
SWFTEXTFIELD_USEFONT was removed on purpose because it was
meant to be a private flag used internally. It is set if
Tim,
Hold off another day or so please. I've got changes, including the
patch system change close to ready (0.2pre1-10). Let us see if we can wrap up
our other thread and then get it all uploaded together.
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Tim Retout wrote:
Package: pornview
Version: 0.2pre1-9
Seve
Martijn,
That's for the work here! Please give me a few days to dust things
off, and I'll take your patch and just make a normal upload with it (and
possibly one other). If for some reason, I don't accomplish that, then your
NMU is OK with me.
Stuart
S
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Package: ming
Version: 1:0.4.2-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package failed to build from source.
Potential fix already uploaded to experimental. I'll keep a watch on the
build logs to see if I got it right.
Stua
FYI, the upstream has continued to change on a regular basis. I've been
waiting on it to settle down, and cut another release. We can't wait
any longer for a final release, so I'll just grab what's there now, and
get started on the updated package.
Stuart
Stuar
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008, Simon Richter wrote:
Hi,
Javier Serrano Polo wrote:
You don't need static variants.
I'm bootstrapping a ppc chroot on amd64 with binfmt-support and normal
qemu.
How does this work? The kernel needs to load qemu from inside the chroot
at this point, including all of the
The patch originally sent is wrong, and incomplete. Attached is a more
thorough fix that achieves good (but not yet perfect) results when
running the fcntl tests from the Linux Test Project in the target. This
patch contains the constant mapping from Kirill A. Shutemov which eliminates
the need f
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
I'd like to report that your package seems to build fine on GNU/kFreeBSD
(at least on kfreebsd-i386 [*]) and I was wondering whether it could be
added to the supported architectures. I'm not sure about kfreebsd-amd64
but if your package builds OK on (l
severity 397457 normal
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
Uh, no, the php.ini file is only supposed to be replaced by the php package
if the administrator *approves* of having the new version installed. That's
the administrator's choice; if they choose to discard local changes to this
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 3/2/07, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
tags 397457 -fixed
thanks
Note that this bug was marked as serious by the maintainer:
Note that the maintainer told the submitter that -10 solves the bug
and -9 isn't in the archive anymore. There'
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, LI Daobing wrote:
check the following small program, it can't compile with lsbc++3.
$ cat bug.cpp
#include
int main() { std::string a[1] = {"1"}; }
Try adding -D_GLIBCXX_EXTERN_TEMPLATE=0. Hopefully, you've got a larger
program also that you can test this one and see if i
This is the same as the upstream bug
http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1523
Stuart
Stuart R. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network & Software Engineering http://www.netsweng.com/
1024D/37A79149:
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006, Wolfgang Schnitker wrote:
Package: lsb-build-base3
Version: 3.1.1-2
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
lsb-build-cc3 not available, unmet dependency
What dependencies are missing?
Stuart
Stuart R. Anderson
Severity: serious
This was meant to have been filed as serious since it impacts support
for developing LSB applications.
Stuart
Stuart R. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network & Software Engineering http://www.netswe
Package: lsb-build-base3
Version: 3.1.1-1
Severity: normal
The development files for the (new to LSB 3) Desktop module are missing.
This makes it very hard to support the development of LSB application
that have a modern GUI.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please remove the packages lsb-build-cc2, lsb-build-cc3, lsb-build-base2
and lsb-build-base3 from the following archs -
alpha
arm
hppa
mips
mipsel
sparc
m68k
Note - lsb-build-base(2|3) may not have m
Package: lsb-build-cc2
Version: 2.1.1-6
Severity: normal
lsb-build-cc2 (and lsb-build-cc3) are Arch: Any, but they bepend on
lsb-build-base2 (and lsb-build-base3), which has an explicite list of
supported archs. This is preventing lsb-build-cc2/3 from entering
testing (and Etch).
These packages
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Thomas Skovsende wrote:
Why isn't ming reported in phpinfo ? I need to add something in
php.ini
I guess ? could it be automated ?
The package should already be adding the extension=ming.so line to all
of the php.ini files. You do need to restart apache by hand however as
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Jan Dittberner wrote:
The apache error log contains the following line:
PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library
'/usr/lib/php5/20060613/ming.so' - /usr/lib/php5/20060613/ming.so:
undefined symbol: zim_swfmovie_protect in Unknown on line 0
I found this in
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Stephane List wrote:
Hi,
Why is php5-ming installed in this directory ?
/usr/lib/php5/20051025/ming.so
This is where all of the PHP% modules get installed.
Why is there no doc installed ?
Mostly because no one has written an appropriate document yet. What
would you wa
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, LaMont Jones wrote:
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:48:20PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
* Improve the description (Closes: #392130)
* Fix FTBFS - only build on supported architectures (Closes: #394892)
Note that you haven't fixed the FTBFS, just made it exp
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Package: lsb-appchk2
Version: 2.1.0-5
Severity: minor
Hi!
Just for the record right ahead, the same applies to lsb-appchk3,
lsb-build-base2 and lsb-build-base3.
The description isn't really helpful - the only difference is in
the package name.
I touched the package last, and have plans to fix one or two more
things, so I'm willing to adopt this package.
Stuart
Stuart R. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network & Software Engineering http://www.netsweng.com/
10
I am still using mydns, and would be willing to adopt it.
Stuart
Stuart R. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network & Software Engineering http://www.netsweng.com/
1024D/37A79149: 0791 D3
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stuart Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package name: php4-ming
Version : 4.4.2
Upstream Author : Stuart Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://www.libming.org/
License : PHP License
Program
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stuart Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: php5-ming
Version : 5.1.4
Upstream Author : Stuart Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.libming.org/
* License : PHP License
Program
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Ondej Surý wrote:
it's not possible for our small team to package every possible module
which exists for PHP{4,5}.
However there is simple way how to fix that; any Debian Developer can
package module off-main-tree, you can look at php-imap, php-pgsql,
php-interbase or php-mc
Tags: help
Please review the package at
http://www.netsweng.com/~anderson/ming-unstable/ming_0.3.0-7.dsc
for compliance with the new policy.
Stuart
Stuart R. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network & Software Engineering
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 09:28 schrieb Alejandro Rios P.:
* Package name: libming-fonts-openoffice
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : OpenOffice.org
* URL : http://www.openoffice.org/
* License : GPL
Description
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Guus Sliepen wrote:
[...]
Description : X Test Suite
This package will contain the X Test Suite (formerly known as VSW5).
That is not a long description. It does not tell me anything, except
that XTS5 was previously known as VSW5. I guess it tests something that
is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stuart Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: tet, tet-dev
Version : 3.7a
Upstream Author : The Open Group
* URL : http://tetware.opengroup.org/
* License : Artistic
Programming Lang: C
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stuart Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xts5
Version : 5.0.2.cvs20070717
Upstream Author : X.Org Foundation
* URL : http://www.x.org/
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: C
Description : X Test
Ooops. I meant to attach the patch to my previous message. Here are the
changes I made.
Stuart
Stuart R. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network & Software Engineering http://www.netsweng.com/
1024D/37A79149:
I have prepared fixes for all 3 of these grave bugs. Support for libxine
is still enabled.
The hanging on open problem turned out to be caused by multiple threads using
XLockDisplay(). In addition to the main thread which is opening the video
plugins, the OpenGL video plugin also starts up a new
On Mon, 15 May 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Stuart
I wonder if you could also package the ming-fonts distribution[1], so the ming
packages can be used out-of-the-box with free fonts.
Regards,
[1]http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/ming/ming-fonts-1.00.tar.gz?download
Yes, I still ne
As the maintainer of the new libming package, I would find this list a
benefit. There are many packages, with some interdependencies, and this
list would help with coordination as we work to get all of these pieces
ready to be included in Debian.
Stuart
Stuart R
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Ulrich Teichert wrote:
I am not sure, but isn't ECOFF still in use by other, still supported
OSes? irix? AIX?
The patch that's attached to the bug only removed ecoff support for
mips*-*-linux* and mips*el-*-linux* in an attempt to have a small an
impact as possible.
A fix for the binutils problem which is worked around in the patches submitted
to these bugs can be found in #363423.
Stuart
Stuart R. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network & Software Engineering http://www.netsweng.c
I was able to narrow this down to the presence of some extra package in the
case where it fails. When I removed autofoo packages, then sed built. In the
case of my chroot, it's quite likely that those got installed at some point
and a build interrupted so they didn't get cleaned up correctly.
At
I have also seen this FTBFS. It fails to build on a powerpc machine, both
inside a sbuild chroot, and outside of the chroot. It does however build on
and i386 & mipsel machine. While all 3 machines are running off of testing,
the set of packages installed on each is likely different.
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Do you think you can get permission from LJ to make that article
available under a free software license, so you could include it as
documentation in the package?
I can certainly look into it.
Stuart
Stuart R. Ande
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stuart Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: lsb-*
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.linuxbase.org/
* License : GPL
Description : LSB development to
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Yes that's is wanted. You have to install the resulting binaries with
--force-depends until gcc is rebuilt. I am working on a patch for it, but
that's a bit more complex.
I bet it is more complex. My original patch used the non-'n' names since
the pac
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Stuart Anderson wrote:
I would be very nice. The new glibc source packages are on:
http://people.debian.org/~aurel32/mips-triarch/glibc/
My LE build finished. It was quicker, but still took several hours.
The build went smoothly, but when I went to install the packages
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
I would be very nice. The new glibc source packages are on:
http://people.debian.org/~aurel32/mips-triarch/glibc/
I'll give it a try on mipsel.
BTW, will you use the new 1480 board? The glibc uses as much as processors as
available using make -j.
C
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Please note also that I used a modified version of this patch (mainly
because the glibc has changed since you reported the bug) to bootstrap
32-bit and 64-bit glibc/gcc/zlib on mips.
I am glad to hear that you were successful!
You can find all the co
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Also, I am ready to give some help there. I am first trying to build the
> gcc and glibc packages on a mips, but I face a chicken and egg problem
> here. Does anybody already have glibc and/or gcc packages for mips? If
> not, what is the easiest way to
ch.dpatch
===
--- debian/patches/mips-biarch.dpatch (.../vendor/gcc-4.0/current)
(revision 0)
+++ debian/patches/mips-biarch.dpatch (.../src/gcc-4.0) (revision 150)
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+#! /bin/sh -e
+
+# DP: Patch author: Stuart Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+# DP: Upstr
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
+! MULTILIB_DIRNAMES = n32 32 64
+! MULTILIB_DIRNAMES = 32 . 64
Why bother?
Stuff in rules.d (binary-libstdcxx.mk) assume that $biarch means put it
in a subdir name "64", and that $biarch32 means put it in a subdir named
"32".
: # remove
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
ar and ld get confused if they are not set. For some reason, it can't
decide which binary format to use. It may be a binutils bug, but I was
trying to not have to dig into that package and create a dependency on
a specific patch level of yet another packa
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005, Matthias Klose wrote:
why can't the biarch-include patch not be used?
It probably can. This is likely the result of my attempts to keep my
changes some what isolated early on. I'll have a look at reducing this
to the existing biarch patch.
as we don't have all required li
nt) (revision 144)
+++ debian/changelog(.../src/glibc) (revision 144)
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+glibc (2.3.5-8.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Enable mips multilib support
+
+ -- Stuart Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:00:47 -0600
+
glibc (2.3.5-
mips-biarch.dpatch
===
--- debian/patches/mips-biarch.dpatch (.../vendor/gcc-4.0/current)
(revision 0)
+++ debian/patches/mips-biarch.dpatch (.../src/gcc-4.0) (revision 145)
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+#! /bin/sh -e
+
+# DP: Patch author: Stuart Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
59 matches
Mail list logo
