Bug#410439: sort does not properly process the "-M" by_date flag

2007-02-28 Thread Roger Marquis
question, don't like what? The URLs you send didn't clarify this question. You probably need to set LC_ALL=C in your environment. In Etch to be sure, but not in FreeBSD or Solaris 10, and I'm pretty sure both of those non-Linux OS are also POSIX compliant. Roger Marquis --

Bug#410439: sort does not properly process the "-M" by_date flag

2007-02-13 Thread Roger Marquis
ns be recognized correctly for the purposes of sorting by date. It does not have anything to do with whitespace. Roger Marquis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#410439: sort does not properly process the "-M" by_date flag

2007-02-12 Thread Roger Marquis
It is reliable but not accurate. "-k 3" stops sorting at the first ":" in the hour:minute:second field. The only way I've yet found to sort on the entire datestamp, "Mmm DD HH:MM:SS", is with the "-M" flag. For clarification, are you saying that the

Bug#410439: sort does not properly process the "-M" by_date flag

2007-02-10 Thread Roger Marquis
when LANG is both defined and defined as some value other than C. 4.0's /etc/environment is where this was being set, to UTF-8. Not sure why "sort -M" would differ between C and UTF8 but if there is no reason this but bug report can be re-filed with GNU. Roger Marquis -- To U

Bug#410439: sort does not properly process the "-M" by_date flag

2007-02-10 Thread Roger Marquis
d. Kudos to the engineer who grafted on this little bit of backwards compatibility. Just wish more GNU coders recognized the importance of backwards compatibility. Why the behavior of "-M" was changed in the first place is beyond me. Roger Marquis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#410439: sort does not properly process the "-M" by_date flag

2007-02-10 Thread Roger Marquis
ind. But you should be aware of the effect it will likely have on future report and reporters. I can say that your replies have helped me understand what might be behind Debian's relatively small market share compared to CentOS, Fedora, and SuSE, despite a superior community process. Roger Marqu

Bug#410439: sort does not properly process the "-M" by_date flag

2007-02-10 Thread Roger Marquis
ith a relatively uncommon option to a non-critical text processing utility would be called "important". Interesting response, though both subjective and incorrect. Can't recall another like it in over 20 years of Unix/Linux bug reports (though this was my first Debian bug report). Roger

Bug#410439: sort does not properly process the "-M" by_date flag

2007-02-10 Thread Roger Marquis
ring tools that parse system logfiles. I have no interest in "causing the bug to get more attention" and do not appreciate the accusation. Roger Marquis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#410439: sort does not properly process the "-M" by_date flag

2007-02-10 Thread Roger Marquis
Package: coreutils Version: sort (GNU coreutils) 5.97 Severity: important Months are correctly parsed but days are not, with 10 listed ahead of 1-9... Could be a whitespace issue. Input format from /var/log i.e, syslogd output. Also, the "-u" or unique flag is wholly broken when used with "-M"