Bug#536955: gnubiff: FTBFS: nls.h:42:23: error: gnome.h: No such file or directory

2009-07-14 Thread Robert Sowada
Hi, > > In file included from support.h:36, > > from gnubiff.cc:30: > > nls.h:42:23: error: gnome.h: No such file or directory > > gnubiff.cc: In function 'int main(int, char**)': > > gnubiff.cc:129: error: 'exit' was not declared in this scope > > gnubiff.cc:159: error: 'EXIT_SUC

Bug#445544: crash if "~/gnome2/eog" is a file

2007-10-06 Thread Robert Sowada
Package: eog Version: 2.20.0-2 Severity: normal If "~/gnome2/eog" is a file eog crashes when started: EOG-ERROR **: file eog-util.c: line 300 (eog_util_dot_dir): assertion failed: (exists) aborting... Removing the file solves the problem (and "~/gnome2/eog" is created as a directory when starti

Bug#346022: gnubiff: Stops reporting new mail afte a little time

2007-01-07 Thread Robert Sowada
Hi, > disable dependence on fam, in which case it polls your mailbox, > but i have no idea at what interval The polling interval can be changed via the "delay", "delay_minutes" and "delay_seconds" options. CU Robert :-) pgpiRYtuYjU8y.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#299848: often does not notice when messages are read

2006-04-23 Thread Robert Sowada
Hi, > OTOH now when gnubiff is running mutt is not able anymore to detect when > a mailbox has new mail, so I quickly stopped using it. This is probably because gnubiff no longer restores the access time of the monitored files by default. This behavior can be changed by setting the option "file_re

Bug#303965: Debian bug #303965 (not detecting sender...)

2005-04-13 Thread Robert Sowada
Hi, now I was able to reproduce the bug. It's fixed in the CVS version of gnubiff. The problem was that the counter for reading only the first body lines was started at the beginning of the mail not at the beginning of the body. The first mail has significant more header lines than the other two m

Bug#303965: Debian Bug #303965 (not detecting subject...)

2005-04-12 Thread Robert Sowada
Hi, thanks for reporting this bug. Your attached message is parsed without any problem by gnubiff. So probably the bug happens when the message is being read (you use the maildir protocol?). Some additional information would be helpful. Thanks, CU Robert :-) pgpK0OoLtqdYv.pgp Description: PGP s

Bug#299848: Debian bug #299848 (not noticing read messages using mutt)

2005-04-12 Thread Robert Sowada
Hi, thanks for reporting this bug. I don't use mutt for myself but some quick tests showed no problems. Therefore I have some additional questions: 1. Is the problem also present when you use a mailbox with few messages? 2. When you have read your messages, do you quit mutt or do you keep it open?

Bug#226914: Debian Bug #226914 (IMAPS bug)

2005-04-11 Thread Robert Sowada
Hi, > On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 21:21 +0200, Robert Sowada wrote: > > this bug should be fixed since 2.1.2. > > I tried it, and unfortunately, I get sth. like the following: > > > ** (gnubiff:28346): WARNING **: [1] Unable to connect to > mailslv1.informatik.hu-berlin.

Bug#226914: Debian Bug #226914 (IMAPS bug)

2005-04-11 Thread Robert Sowada
Hi Roland, this bug should be fixed since 2.1.2. CU Robert :-) pgpg9MAZSStik.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#297774: maildir protocol (debian bug #297774)

2005-04-01 Thread Robert Sowada
Hi, > Works For Me (TM) - but I have to specify something like > /home/alexis/Maildir/new instead of the more usual > /home/alexis/Maildir (otherwise, it checks for new messages at startup > and never again, since FAM is watching the wrong dir... I guess this > already happened before...) Thanks

Bug#297774: maildir protocol (debian bug #297774)

2005-03-31 Thread Robert Sowada
Hi, I added the detecting of the FAMDeleted event to the cvs version. So finally maildir protocol should be fixed now (can someone that uses this protocol confirm this?). The FAMPending problem: I added this as a quick workaround and then it was forgotten (as usual;-), because the original code b

Bug#297774: Maildir bug (debian bug #297774)

2005-03-03 Thread Robert Sowada
Hi, thanks for reporting this bug. I just committed a bugfix to cvs that may fix this bug. Can you test if the bug is still present in this version once it is available via anonymous cvs? CU Robert :-) pgp7X0WvhZlOg.pgp Description: PGP signature