Bug#1080115: fixed in upstream release 0.15.0

2024-10-16 Thread Paolo Greppi
According to the issue: https://github.com/magic-wormhole/magic-wormhole/issues/537 this should be fixed upstream in releases 0.15.0 and later. A fix for the version in sid is to pin the attr module to version 23.2.0 but ATM python3-attr in sid is at version 24.2.0-1: https://packages.debian.or

Bug#1080183: FTBFS with upcoming doxygen

2024-09-01 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi! Il 01/09/24 18:32, Samuel Thibault ha scritto: ... It would have been convenient to upload it to experimental, to be easily able to reproduce the issue (building doxygen almost OOM-ed by laptop). ... Next time you can perhaps use the deb package built within the CI: https://salsa.debian.or

Bug#1080182: FTBFS with upcoming doxygen

2024-09-01 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi! Il 01/09/24 07:35, Sebastiaan Couwenberg ha scritto: On 8/31/24 11:04 AM, Paolo Greppi wrote: Hi! I have rebuilt a few packages: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/doxygen/-/wikis/ratt_doxygen_1.12.0+ds-1-partial with the upcoming doxygen 1.12.0+ds-1 I am preparing here: You should upload

Bug#1080187: FTBFS with upcoming doxygen

2024-08-31 Thread Paolo Greppi
Source: toulbar2 X-Debbugs-Cc: paolo.gre...@libpf.com Version: 1.2.1+dfsg-0.1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Hi! I have rebuilt a few packages: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/doxygen/-/wikis/ratt_doxygen_1.12.0+ds-1-partial with the upcoming doxygen 1.12.0+ds-1 I am preparing here: https://salsa.

Bug#1080183: FTBFS with upcoming doxygen

2024-08-31 Thread Paolo Greppi
Source: lwip X-Debbugs-Cc: paolo.gre...@libpf.com Version: 2.2.0+dfsg1-7 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Hi! I have rebuilt a few packages: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/doxygen/-/wikis/ratt_doxygen_1.12.0+ds-1-partial with the upcoming doxygen 1.12.0+ds-1 I am preparing here: https://salsa.debia

Bug#1080182: FTBFS with upcoming doxygen

2024-08-31 Thread Paolo Greppi
Source: geos X-Debbugs-Cc: paolo.gre...@libpf.com Version: 3.12.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Hi! I have rebuilt a few packages: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/doxygen/-/wikis/ratt_doxygen_1.12.0+ds-1-partial with the upcoming doxygen 1.12.0+ds-1 I am preparing here: https://salsa.debian.org

Bug#1061080: should this patch be upstreamed?

2024-08-29 Thread Paolo Greppi
Perhaps this patch should be upstreamed? I found this related issue: https://github.com/AGWA/git-crypt/issues/290 Paolo

Bug#1059611: take ownership and mark as pending

2024-08-19 Thread Paolo Greppi
owner 1059611 Paolo Greppi tag 1059611 pending thanks I am working to upload the recently released 1.12, which should also close this one. WIP here: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/doxygen Paolo

Bug#1078868: take ownership and mark as pending

2024-08-19 Thread Paolo Greppi
owner 1078868 Paolo Greppi tag 1078868 pending thanks Many thanks for your submission. I am working to upload the recently released 1.12, which should close this one. WIP here: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/doxygen Paolo

Bug#1076860: duplicate of 834756?

2024-07-24 Thread Paolo Greppi
This ITP looks like a duplicate of the RFP: https://bugs.debian.org/834756 Paolo

Bug#910799: helm PPA

2024-07-04 Thread Paolo Greppi
According to upstream, you can install helm from apt on Debian: https://helm.sh/docs/intro/install/#from-apt-debianubuntu > Members of the Helm community have contributed a Helm package for Apt. The link points to: https://helm.baltorepo.com/stable/debian/packages/helm/ The package source appar

Bug#1033482: also here

2023-12-07 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi, I have tripped onto this while following blindly the automatic sbuild setup using sbuild-debian-developer-setup described here: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild#Automatic_setup_using_sbuild-debian-developer-setup Alberto's workaround (sudo apt install -t bookworm-backports debootstrap) worked

Bug#1051166: FTBFS with doxygen 1.9.8

2023-09-03 Thread Paolo Greppi
Package: breathe-doc Version: 4.35.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: paolo.gre...@libpf.com While preparing to upload doxygen 1.9.8, I did a partial rebuild of packages that build-depend on it. More in

Bug#1051165: FTBFS with doxygen 1.9.8

2023-09-03 Thread Paolo Greppi
Package: libstxxl-doc Version: 1.4.1-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: paolo.gre...@libpf.com While preparing to upload doxygen 1.9.8, I did a partial rebuild of packages that build-depend on it. More in

Bug#1051162: FTBFS with doxygen 1.9.8

2023-09-03 Thread Paolo Greppi
Package: netcdf-doc Version: 1:4.9.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: paolo.gre...@libpf.com While preparing to upload doxygen 1.9.8, I did a partial rebuild of packages that build-depend on it. More in

Bug#1051156: FTBFS with doxygen 1.9.8

2023-09-03 Thread Paolo Greppi
Package: seqan-raptor-doc Version: 3.0.1+ds-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: paolo.gre...@libpf.com While preparing to upload doxygen 1.9.8, I did a partial rebuild of packages that build-depend on it.

Bug#1051155: FTBFS with doxygen 1.9.8

2023-09-03 Thread Paolo Greppi
Package: wxpython-tools Version: 4.2.1+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: paolo.gre...@libpf.com While preparing to upload doxygen 1.9.8, I did a partial rebuild of packages that build-depend on it.

Bug#1051154: FTBFS with doxygen 1.9.8

2023-09-03 Thread Paolo Greppi
Package: libcaca-dev Version: 0.99.beta20-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: paolo.gre...@libpf.com While preparing to upload doxygen 1.9.8, I did a partial rebuild of packages that build-depend on it. Mo

Bug#1040864:

2023-07-11 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi Andreas! Il 11/07/23 22:27, Andreas Hasenack ha scritto: So I took a stab at backporting the upstream patches, and there are many: $ grep ^commit debian/patches/doc-build-with-newer-cairo-*.patch debian/patches/doc-build-with-newer-cairo-1.patch:commit c22ae5ed4ca8d7e5568be7d5a930ee388117703

Bug#1017504: Enabling large file support in doxygen

2023-01-11 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi! sorry for the long delay, at last I'm looking at incorporating your patch. It's now WIP here: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/doxygen Before I upload it to unstable, I was wandering: 1. what would be the easiest way to turn this on only for 32-bit builds? 2. what side effects can we expect?

Bug#1015864: doxygen: diff for NMU version 1.9.4-3.1

2022-10-17 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi Adrian, Il 15/10/22 14:30, Adrian Bunk ha scritto: Control: tags 1015864 + patch Control: tags 1015864 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for doxygen (versioned as 1.9.4-3.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/15. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. cu Adrian thanks f

Bug#1016208: jenkins.debian.org: downloading artifacts from tests.reproducible-builds.org

2022-07-29 Thread Paolo Greppi
Package: jenkins.debian.org X-Debbugs-Cc: paolo.gre...@libpf.com Severity: normal Hi, I am looking at the reproducible build results for doxygen: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/doxygen.html If I remember well, previously it was possible to download the build

Bug#1016050: sddm: intermittedly shows black page instead of login screen

2022-07-25 Thread Paolo Greppi
Package: sddm X-Debbugs-Cc: paolo.gre...@libpf.com Version: 0.19.0-3 Severity: important About 90% of the times after a fresh reboot, sddm shows a black page with mouse pointer instead of the login screen. The systemd sddm service is up and running. If I restart it on tty 1, the login screen

Bug#1015862: geos-bin: FTBFS with upcoming doxygen 1.9.4

2022-07-22 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi! thanks for the quick reaction. Il 22/07/22 18:01, Sebastiaan Couwenberg ha scritto: Control: tags -1 upstream Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/libgeos/geos/issues/654 On 7/22/22 17:37, Paolo Greppi wrote: I am about to upload the current version of doxygen, before doing that I ran

Bug#1015865: liblog4c3: FTBFS with upcoming doxygen 1.9.4

2022-07-22 Thread Paolo Greppi
Package: liblog4c3 Version: 1.2.4-2 Severity: important File: /usr/share/doc/liblog4c3/copyright Tags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: paolo.gre...@libpf.com Hello, I am about to upload the current version of doxygen, before doing that I ran a quick scan of ~500 build-deps (https://salsa.debian.org/debian

Bug#1015861: bamtools: FTBFS with upcoming doxygen 1.9.4

2022-07-22 Thread Paolo Greppi
Package: bamtools Version: 2.5.1+dfsg-10+b1 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: paolo.gre...@libpf.com Hello, I am about to upload the current version of doxygen, before doing that I run a quick scan of build-deps of doxygen (https://salsa.debian.org/debian/doxygen/-/wikis/ratt_doxyg

Bug#924040: next steps

2022-07-21 Thread Paolo Greppi
I installed the package above and when I tried the archivebox command I got the same error about the missing atomicwrites module. This is easy to fix by adding lib/python3.9/site-packages/atomicwrites/__init__.py from https://pypi.org/project/atomicwrites/ 1.4.1 as debian/vendor/atomicwrites.

Bug#924040: 0.6.2

2022-07-20 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi! and thanks for your efforts to package archivebox. I have picked it up from there and tried to build the current version (0.6.2). For that I have refreshed the patches, here is a MR: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/archivebox/-/merge_requests/1 Feel free to pick up whatever you need from t

Bug#808641: duplicate of #818379

2022-07-17 Thread Paolo Greppi
Thanks for your bug report. This is caused by doxygen not reporting dot failures, which is tracked at bug #818379. Paolo

Bug#1000932: doxygen: diff for NMU version 1.9.1-2.1

2022-07-17 Thread Paolo Greppi
Il 15/07/22 00:23, Sebastian Ramacher ha scritto: On 2022-07-14 16:23:16 +0200, Paolo Greppi wrote: ... ACK, I've canceled the NMU. Please consider that doxygen is a key package and thus effectively keeping llvm-toolchain-11 in testing. A timely fix for this issue would be much apprec

Bug#1001682: should be fixed by the upcoming 1.9.4 version

2022-07-16 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi! and thanks for reporting. I am in the process of packaging doxygen 1.9.4 and this issue seems to be fixed in that version. To test, I did this twice: cd `mktemp -d` git clone https://github.com/BYVoid/OpenCC cd OpenCC/ cd doc # no need to run cmake etc. just quickly ge

Bug#235576: fixed in the current version, will close soon

2022-07-16 Thread Paolo Greppi
I reproduced with the attached minimal example and no warning is printed. Upstream issue is also closed. Will now close. P. test.tar.xz Description: application/xz

Bug#216195: fixed in the current version, will close soon

2022-07-16 Thread Paolo Greppi
I reproduced with the attached minimal example and no warning is printed. Upstream issue is also closed. Will now close. P. test.tar.xz Description: application/xz

Bug#818379: WARN_AS_ERROR=YES could be the solution

2022-07-16 Thread Paolo Greppi
Since some time doxygen has a WARN_AS_ERROR config option: https://doxygen.nl/manual/config.html#cfg_warn_as_error Since version 1.9.1 or 1.9.2 if that is set to YES, graphviz's dot is absent but HAVE_DOT=YES is set, doxygen will stop and exit with status of 1 (upstream choose this opt-in way f

Bug#1000932: doxygen: diff for NMU version 1.9.1-2.1

2022-07-14 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi Sebastian! Il 14/07/22 11:22, Sebastian Ramacher ha scritto: Control: tags 1000932 + patch Control: tags 1000932 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for doxygen (versioned as 1.9.1-2.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Cheer

Bug#1012021: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1012021: unreproducible here

2022-05-29 Thread Paolo Greppi
Il 29/05/22 21:34, Pirate Praveen ha scritto: On തി, മേയ് 30 2022 at 12:56:53 രാവിലെ +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Pirate Praveen wrote: On ഞാ, മേയ് 29 2022 at 09:34:45 രാവിലെ +02:00:00 +02:00:00, Paolo Greppi wrote: Hi Andreas! thanks for your report. To try to reproduce it, I set ... Finally

Bug#1012021: unreproducible here

2022-05-29 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi Andreas! thanks for your report. To try to reproduce it, I set up multiarch for docker (https://github.com/multiarch/qemu-user-static) then: docker run --rm -it arm64v8/debian:unstable bash apt update apt upgrade apt install curl yarnpkg curl -o package.json https://salsa

Bug#980316: about corepack and yarnpkg

2022-01-09 Thread Paolo Greppi
I stumbled upon this thread related to packaging corepack for gentoo: https://github.com/nodejs/corepack/issues/76 We now have node 16 in experimental, but our package does not bundle corepack (as upstream does): https://packages.debian.org/experimental/amd64/nodejs/filelist I propose that we

Bug#1001532: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1001532: yarnpkg: yarnpkg --version cannot find @babel/runtime/helpers module

2021-12-12 Thread Paolo Greppi
Il 11/12/21 18:29, Brian Thompson ha scritto: Package: yarnpkg Severity: important Dear Maintainer, After install yarnpkg for the first time and running `yarnpkg --version`, I got the following error: Error: Cannot find module '@babel/runtime/helpers/interopRequireWildcard' I expected the pac

Bug#991544: closing rathen than merging

2021-07-27 Thread Paolo Greppi
See https://bugs.debian.org/985857 Paolo

Bug#991544: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#991544: please package bootstrap 5

2021-07-27 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi, Il 27/07/21 08:51, Daniel Baumann ha scritto: Package: twitter-bootstrap4 Hi, thanks a lot for maintaining bootstrap in Debian. Do you already have an ETA for bootstrap 5 (probably a new package in Debian I guess)? Regards, Daniel thanks for your request but twitter-bootstrap4 is no D

Bug#940704: I give up

2021-01-28 Thread Paolo Greppi
Control: noowner -1 Control: tags -1 - pending Trying to make the upstream test suite, designed for jest 22, work with our jest 26 is tricky. Also some things defy intuition, i.e. I patch here: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-yarnpkg/-/blob/wip/paolog/jest/debian/patches/20-jest-require-a

Bug#981241: tracker.debian.org: please update uscan

2021-01-28 Thread Paolo Greppi
Package: tracker.debian.org X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-javascript-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Severity: important For yarnpkg: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/node-yarnpkg tracker.debian.org reports: uscan had problems while searching for a new upstream version: unrecognized option ctype=nodejs The

Bug#940704: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#940704: next error

2021-01-27 Thread Paolo Greppi
Dear Xavier, Il 27/01/21 06:30, Xavier ha scritto: Le 27/01/2021 à 00:14, Paolo Greppi a écrit : I fixed the error:     Cannot find module 'babel-preset-env' but I am not sure if the fix is 100% right. Now I get:     TypeError: Cannot read property 'mkdir' of und

Bug#940704: next error

2021-01-26 Thread Paolo Greppi
I fixed the error: Cannot find module 'babel-preset-env' but I am not sure if the fix is 100% right. Now I get: TypeError: Cannot read property 'mkdir' of undefined 5 | export default function(filename?: string): Promise { 6 | return new Promise((resolve, reject

Bug#981105: RM: node-i18next-xhr-backend -- ROM; not used and deprecated upstream

2021-01-26 Thread Paolo Greppi
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal This package has low popcon (1), and according to upstream: https://github.com/i18next/i18next-xhr-backend it is "[deprecated] can be replaced with i18next-http-backend". The latter we already have in Debian: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/node-i18next-ht

Bug#940704: new error: Cannot find module 'babel-preset-env'

2021-01-23 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi, I think I fixed the error: Cannot find module 'babel-plugin-transform-inline-imports-commonjs' with this commit: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-yarnpkg/-/commit/d055e01b6d1a7f6fad6df2ccdf6d0f7d01ddcbc2 but the tests still fail, all with this new error: FAIL __tests__/commands/li

Bug#980775: your initial example also fails with upstream

2021-01-23 Thread Paolo Greppi
I tried using the docker "official image" for node: docker pull node docker run -it --rm node bash mkdir -p test/foo cd test yes '' | yarn init yarn add file:foo yields: yarn add file:foo yarn add v1.22.5 info No lockfile found. [1/4] Resolving packages... [2/4] Fetching p

Bug#980775: patch

2021-01-23 Thread Paolo Greppi
With this WIP patch: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-yarnpkg/-/blob/master/debian/patches/18-uuid.diff I can do: rm -rf /tmp/test mkdir -p /tmp/test/foo cd /tmp/test yes '' | yarn init cd foo yes '' | yarn init cd .. yarn add file:foo and get: yarn add

Bug#977814: should be fixed with clazy 1.9-3

2021-01-21 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi I see "pass" for clazy/1.9-3 with llvm-toolchain-11/1:11.0.1-2: https://ci.debian.net/packages/c/clazy/testing/amd64/ I also tried this here on unstable and the autopkgtest did pass. Can you check and if confirmed as fixed close this bug? Thanks, Paolo

Bug#975931: should be fixed with pocl 1.6 ?

2021-01-21 Thread Paolo Greppi
pocl 1.6-3 has migrated to testing on 2021-01-13, and upstream declares that v1.6 includes "Support for Clang/LLVM 11". Can you try your reproducer now ? Thanks Paolo

Bug#979007: Processed: retitle and set severity to critical

2021-01-14 Thread Paolo Greppi
Dear Melvin, Il 14/01/21 13:51, Melvin Vermeeren ha scritto: Hi Paolo, On Thursday, 14 January 2021 10:28:32 CET Paolo Greppi wrote: Doh I had not seen this: https://bugs.debian.org/976227 Let me put both the future Debian maintainer and the current upstream maintainer in Cc. Thanks for the

Bug#979007: Processed: retitle and set severity to critical

2021-01-14 Thread Paolo Greppi
Il 14/01/21 09:40, Sebastian Ramacher ha scritto: ... The package is orphaned. If you a fix for it, please upload it. Best Doh I had not seen this: https://bugs.debian.org/976227 Let me put both the future Debian maintainer and the current upstream maintainer in Cc. I am a DM and currently

Bug#979007: Processed: retitle and set severity to critical

2021-01-14 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi Sebastian, Il 09/01/21 11:41, Sebastian Ramacher ha scritto: Control: severity -1 serious ... No, critical is not the correct severity for FTBFS bugs. That's serious. Sorry my fault. I just added a "forwarded upstream" link, it is possible that just by applying the patch provided by upst

Bug#979551: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#979551: node-babel7: update-alternatives set up fails

2021-01-08 Thread Paolo Greppi
Il 08/01/21 11:35, Jonas Smedegaard ha scritto: Quoting Paolo Greppi (2021-01-08 08:46:36) I guess that's because the bullseye-slim image lacks the manpages. A Debian install with man pages excluded seems to be an unsupported system: Whatever hooks applied to do that trick should be ext

Bug#979551: node-babel7: update-alternatives set up fails

2021-01-07 Thread Paolo Greppi
Package: node-babel7 Version: 7.12.11+~cs150.141.84-3 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, installing node-babel7 on official debian "bullseye-slim" docker image fails like this: docker pull debian:bullseye-slim docker run --rm -it debian:bullseye-slim apt update && apt install -y --no-install

Bug#979403: skopeo: Error loading trust policy: open /etc/containers/policy.json: no such file or directory

2021-01-06 Thread Paolo Greppi
Package: skopeo Version: 1.2.0+dfsg1-2 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, I noticed that if skopeo is installed without buildah, a simple command such as: skopeo copy docker://busybox oci:busybox fails with: FATA[] Error loading trust policy: open /etc/containers/policy.json: no su

Bug#979014: wxpython4.0: FTBFS with doxygen 1.9.0 from experimental

2021-01-02 Thread Paolo Greppi
Il 02/01/21 02:51, Scott Talbert ha scritto: On Sat, 2 Jan 2021, Paolo Greppi wrote: The ext/wxWidgets/docs/doxygen/out/xml dir produced with doxygen 1.8.20 is 50 MB and contains 1812 files. The ext/wxWidgets/docs/doxygen/out/xml dir produced with doxygen 1.9.0 is 42 MB and contains 1583

Bug#979014: wxpython4.0: FTBFS with doxygen 1.9.0 from experimental

2021-01-01 Thread Paolo Greppi
Source: wxpython4.0 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, in a partial rebuild of the doxygen build dependencies against 1.9.0 from experimental: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/doxygen/-/wikis/ratt_doxygen_1.9.0-1_amd64-partial this package failed to build with this error: Finished command:

Bug#979011: forgot to attach the log file

2021-01-01 Thread Paolo Greppi
libvigraimpex_1.11.1+dfsg-7.xz Description: application/xz

Bug#979011: libvigraimpex: FTBFS with doxygen 1.9.0 from experimental

2021-01-01 Thread Paolo Greppi
Source: libvigraimpex Severity: important Dear Maintainer, in a partial rebuild of the doxygen build dependencies against 1.9.0 from experimental: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/doxygen/-/wikis/ratt_doxygen_1.9.0-1_amd64-partial this package failed to build with this error: Postprocessing h

Bug#979007: breathe: FTBFS with doxygen 1.9.0 from experimental

2021-01-01 Thread Paolo Greppi
Source: breathe Severity: important Dear Maintainer, in a partial rebuild of the doxygen build dependencies against 1.9.0 from experimental: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/doxygen/-/wikis/ratt_doxygen_1.9.0-1_amd64-partial this package failed to build with this error: AssertionError > /<

Bug#940704: autopkgtests now failing

2020-12-27 Thread Paolo Greppi
I have enabled he upstream test suite on salsa, it fails with many of these: FAIL __tests__/commands/install/integration.js ● Test suite failed to run Cannot find module 'babel-plugin-transform-inline-imports-commonjs' Require stack: ... See: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-

Bug#940704: some tests do pass

2020-12-24 Thread Paolo Greppi
I have run jest in the yarnpkg source tree with: jest --ci __tests__/ having this jest.config.js to disable failing tests: module.exports = { testURL: "http://localhost/";, testPathIgnorePatterns: [ "/node_modules/", "/__tests__/index.js", "/__tests__/integration.js", "/__tes

Bug#977781: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977781: Bug#977781: real issue is, it does not pull not-yet-cached modules

2020-12-21 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi Akshay, many thanks for the debugging ! see below Il 22/12/20 06:06, Akshay S Dinesh ha scritto: There are some 4 pipes before the finish event. I'm looking through each one of them to see if there's a mismatch. It seems to be tar-fs Please see https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-yar

Bug#977781: real issue is, it does not pull not-yet-cached modules

2020-12-21 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi Pirate, what you want to put in ~/.yarnrc.yml could be installed globally to /etc/yarn/config or /etc/yarnrc, but that does not actually fix it. I think the real issue is that it does not pull not-yet-cached modules. To reproduce: # clear cache rm -rf ~/.cache/yarn # actual test cd

Bug#976405: texlive-latex-base: pdflatex command fails while building doxygen

2020-12-12 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi Hilmar, Il 09/12/20 23:44, Hilmar Preuße ha scritto: Control: reassign -1 src:doxygen ... As explained this issue is probably not related to changed in TL base, hence I'm reassigning to src:doxygen . For the other build failures, w/ docbook based documents I've opened Bug#976887 w/ critica

Bug#976405: also happens on amd64, should be worked around by 1.8.20-5 but the real fix will come with 1.8.20-6

2020-12-05 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi Lucas (is it you, or a bot?), thanks for the new bug report about doxygen 1.8.20-4 FTBFS on arm64: https://bugs.debian.org/976495 I had noticed this issue yesterday and worked around it with 1.8.20-5 but the real fix will come with 1.8.20-6, thanks to a tip from Norbert Preining: https://bug

Bug#976405: texlive-latex-base: pdflatex command fails while building doxygen

2020-12-05 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi Norbert, Il 04/12/20 23:29, Norbert Preining ha scritto: Hi Paolo, /usr/bin/pdflatex: Not writing to ../html/examples/group/latex//group__group2.aux (openout_any = p). make[4]: *** [doc/CMakeFiles/doxygen_pdf.dir/build.make:81: doc/CMakeFiles/doxygen_pdf] Error 1 Is this new? This

Bug#976405: texlive-latex-base: pdflatex command fails while building doxygen

2020-12-04 Thread Paolo Greppi
Package: texlive-latex-base Version: 2020.20201203-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, doxygen FTBFS due to a failure to run pdflatex. See this recent salsa build: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/doxygen/-/jobs/1213110 The error is: /usr/bin/pdflatex: Not writing to ../html/examples/gro

Bug#976081: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976081: yarnpkg: Provide prebuilt yarnpkg in contrib

2020-11-30 Thread Paolo Greppi
On Sun, 29 Nov 2020 18:02:16 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote: Control: clone -1 -2 Control: retitle -2 "Provide prebuilt yarnpkg in contrib" On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 22:07, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> 3. Build it using 'deb >> https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20

Bug#973741: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#973741: gitlab: Yarn hasn't been able to find a cache folder it can use

2020-11-28 Thread Paolo Greppi
there is a 4th option, see below Il 28/11/20 20:28, Pirate Praveen ha scritto: ... So some options I can think, 1. Port yarn 1.x to build with babel 7 (but this has not been successfull) 2. Try to run ES6 code directly somehow, may be with newer nodejs and patches. I think Paolo tried this opt

Bug#973741: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#973741: gitlab: Yarn hasn't been able to find a cache folder it can use

2020-11-28 Thread Paolo Greppi
See below Il 28/11/20 20:28, Pirate Praveen ha scritto: On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 23:50:24 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote: ... So some options I can think, 1. Port yarn 1.x to build with babel 7 (but this has not been successfull) 2. Try to run ES6 code directly somehow, may be with newer nodejs and pa

Bug#972952: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#972952: Bug#972952: node-mkdirp 1.0 is incompatible with 0.5, breaks yarnpkg

2020-10-26 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi Xavier, Il 26/10/20 20:24, Xavier ha scritto: Le 26/10/2020 à 15:28, ano...@users.sourceforge.net a écrit : ... Hi JS Team, yarnpkg is not in testing due to babel problems. Do you agree to dicrease severity of this bug to allow mkdirp transition (or reassign this bug to node-yarnpkg) ?

Bug#969313: doxygen: fails to parse long configuration files from standard input

2020-08-31 Thread Paolo Greppi
Package: doxygen Version: 1.8.19-1 Severity: serious when doxygen is invoked with the "-" parameter, it does not always do what is advertised in the doxygen manpage ("If - is used for configName doxygen will read from standard input") due to a buffer size limit, only 4096 characters of the conf

Bug#950675: upstream does support doxygen-latex, but ...

2020-08-31 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi Simon, thanks for revving the conversation on this bug. I'll summarize below my points. Il 20/08/20 11:08, Simon McVittie ha scritto: > On Wed, 05 Feb 2020 at 11:56:16 +0100, Paolo Greppi wrote: > ... > smcv > - in general printable documentation is less relevant now t

Bug#969142: BTW do not add graphviz as build-dep

2020-08-31 Thread Paolo Greppi
Also note that if doyxgen parses the correct and full configuration file, it does not invoke dot So please discard my initial suggestion to add graphviz as a build-dependency, that was wrong ! Paolo

Bug#969142: frobby: FTBFS with doxygen 1.8.19

2020-08-31 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi Douglas, see below. Il 30/08/20 13:57, Torrance, Douglas ha scritto: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 8/28/20 3:43 AM, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> while rebuilding the build dependencies of doxygen with the upcoming doxygen >> 1.8.19 >> (https://salsa.debian

Bug#969149: possible fix

2020-08-28 Thread Paolo Greppi
Please note that a similar problem has been fixed by the fcml maintainer: https://bugs.debian.org/969148 Paolo

Bug#969148: fcml: FTBFS with doxygen 1.8.19

2020-08-28 Thread Paolo Greppi
Hi Stephen, Il 28/08/20 12:22, Stephen Kitt ha scritto: > Hi Paolo, > >> ... > > After building the package with doxygen from experimental, I get > > $ find . -name doxygen.\* > ./docs/doxygen/doxygen.stamp > ./docs/doxygen/html/doxygen.css > ./docs/doxygen/html/doxygen.svg > ./docs/doxygen/la

Bug#969150: boost1.71: FTBFS with doxygen 1.8.19

2020-08-28 Thread Paolo Greppi
Source: boost1.71 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, while rebuilding the build dependencies of doxygen with the upcoming doxygen 1.8.19 (https://salsa.debian.org/debian/doxygen/-/wikis/ratt_doxygen_1.8.19-1_amd64-partial) this package FTBFS. This is the error: doxygen-action build-doc/boost/

Bug#969147: aubio-tools: FTBFS with doxygen 1.8.19

2020-08-28 Thread Paolo Greppi
Package: aubio-tools Version: 0.4.9-4+b1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, while rebuilding the build dependencies of doxygen with the upcoming doxygen 1.8.19 (https://salsa.debian.org/debian/doxygen/-/wikis/ratt_doxygen_1.8.19-1_amd64-partial) this package FTBFS. This is the error: sh: 1: d

Bug#969148: fcml: FTBFS with doxygen 1.8.19

2020-08-28 Thread Paolo Greppi
Package: fcml Version: 1.2.2-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, while rebuilding the build dependencies of doxygen with the upcoming doxygen 1.8.19 (https://salsa.debian.org/debian/doxygen/-/wikis/ratt_doxygen_1.8.19-1_amd64-partial) this package FTBFS. This is the error: dh_doxygen: error:

Bug#969149: imagemagick: FTBFS with doxygen 1.8.19

2020-08-28 Thread Paolo Greppi
Package: imagemagick Version: 8:6.9.11.24+dfsg-1+b1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, while rebuilding the build dependencies of doxygen with the upcoming doxygen 1.8.19 (https://salsa.debian.org/debian/doxygen/-/wikis/ratt_doxygen_1.8.19-1_amd64-partial) this package FTBFS. This is the error

Bug#969145: sratom: FTBFS with doxygen 1.8.19

2020-08-28 Thread Paolo Greppi
Source: sratom Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, while rebuilding the build dependencies of doxygen with the upcoming doxygen 1.8.19 (https://salsa.debian.org/debian/doxygen/-/wikis/ratt_doxygen_1.8.19-1_amd64-partial) this package FTBFS. This error comes up: dh_install: warning: Cannot find

Bug#969141: of course I forgot to attach the logs

2020-08-28 Thread Paolo Greppi
logs.tar.xz Description: application/xz

Bug#969143: libsord-dev: FTBFS with doxygen 1.8.19

2020-08-28 Thread Paolo Greppi
Package: libsord-dev Version: 0.16.4-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, while rebuilding the build dependencies of doxygen with the upcoming doxygen 1.8.19 (https://salsa.debian.org/debian/doxygen/-/wikis/ratt_doxygen_1.8.19-1_amd64-partial) this package FTBFS. doxygen reports: warning: Tag

Bug#969142: frobby: FTBFS with doxygen 1.8.19

2020-08-28 Thread Paolo Greppi
Package: libfrobby0 Version: 0.9.1-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, while rebuilding the build dependencies of doxygen with the upcoming doxygen 1.8.19 (https://salsa.debian.org/debian/doxygen/-/wikis/ratt_doxygen_1.8.19-1_amd64-partial) this package FTBFS. This is the error: sh: 1: dot:

Bug#969141: websocketpp: errors while generating documentation & FTBFS with doxygen 1.8.19

2020-08-28 Thread Paolo Greppi
Source: websocketpp Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, while rebuilding the build dependencies of doxygen with the upcoming doxygen 1.8.19 (https://salsa.debian.org/debian/doxygen/-/wikis/ratt_doxygen_1.8.19-1_amd64-partial) this package FTBFS. I attach the buildlogs: - buildlogs/websocketpp_0

Bug#968921: ITP: dotnet-core-3.1 -- Microsoft .NET Core SDK 3.0.100

2020-08-23 Thread Paolo Greppi
Also see https://bugs.debian.org/779970 Paolo

Bug#960120: node-yarnpkg: I found an older commit that still builds

2020-08-16 Thread Paolo Greppi
Il 15/08/20 14:00, Pirate Praveen ha scritto: >> With this build: >> https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-yarnpkg/-/jobs/915568#L2420 > >> I get a different error while building: >> [17:58:12] Starting 'build'... >> 2420[17:58:13] Error: [BABEL] >> /builds/js-team/node-yarnpkg/debian/output/node

Bug#968340: thanks for the heads up

2020-08-13 Thread Paolo Greppi
H, this was already in my todo list. But it's good to know this release is of value for someone, I'll give it a higher priority. So I plan to upload to experimental in a week or so. Before uploading to unstable I'd like to launch the usual ratt built (see wiki on salsa) so it will take a bit lon

Bug#960120: different error during build

2020-08-06 Thread Paolo Greppi
With this build: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-yarnpkg/-/jobs/915568#L2420 I get a different error while building: [17:58:12] Starting 'build'... 2420[17:58:13] Error: [BABEL] /builds/js-team/node-yarnpkg/debian/output/node-yarnpkg-1.22.4/src/api.js: Cannot find module 'babel-plugin-tran

Bug#964218: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#964218: node-yarnpkg: autopkgtest fails with node-uuid 8.2 from experimental - "Cannot read property 'v4' of undefined"

2020-07-03 Thread Paolo Greppi
Updating that dependency is already in upsream's TODO list https://github.com/yarnpkg/yarn/issues/6829 .. but they seem to lag on updating dependencies. I guess it would require fixing against this breaking change: https://github.com/uuidjs/uuid/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#-breaking-changes and upstr

Bug#961337: ITP: A secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript.

2020-06-29 Thread Paolo Greppi
Il 29/06/20 21:27, Akshat Agarwal ha scritto: > Package: wnpp > Followup-For: Bug #961337 > Owner: Akshat Agarwal > > > * Package name: deno > Version : 1.1.2 > Upstream Author : Deno authors > * URL : https://github.com/denoland/deno > * License : MIT > Pro

Bug#961726: OK ! here are the tarballs

2020-05-28 Thread Paolo Greppi
This certainly makes sense and will be easier to digest by ftp-master (although you'll have two packages in NEW). For the tarballs, they are here: https://gitlab.eumetsat.int/open-source/PublicDecompWT/-/tags (click on the Download icon at the right). gitlab works well with uscan, see for exampl

Bug#913997: what is the current maintainer view on this ?

2020-05-26 Thread Paolo Greppi
The issue has been raised again on the yarnpkg side: https://bugs.debian.org/940511 Antonio, what is your point of view ? Do you think we can fix this for the Bookworm release ? Thanks, Paolo

Bug#940511: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#940511: yarnpkg: Package symlink yarn -> yarnpkg

2020-05-26 Thread Paolo Greppi
See below ... On Wed, 20 May 2020 18:08:29 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?Ma=C3=ABl_Nison?= wrote: > Hi, I'm Maël, Yarn's lead maintainer. > > While cmdtest has a popcon score higher than the yarn package, it's mostly > because Yarn isn't traditionally installed using the Debian package. For > historical reas

Bug#940704: first try with node-jest 24.9.0

2020-05-11 Thread Paolo Greppi
With node-jest now in the NEW queue, I have started working on this here: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-yarnpkg/-/tree/jest I have built jest from https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-jest assuming commit b9255f45c22c030b863e7d42aaf78c207db43478 will be tagged as 24.9.0+ds-2 (althoug

Bug#958780: do we really want to do this ?

2020-04-26 Thread Paolo Greppi
My understanding is that node-gulp-babel v8 should be used with babel7. Same goes for node-babel-loader, you need v8 for babel7, but we only have node-babel-loader 7 in Debian. If we want babel6 to co-exist with babel7, then we don't want to just update node-gulp-babel and node-babel-loader to v

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >