Thank you for the information. Now everything is working as you described.
See you at DebConf?
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
From: Niels Thykier [ni...@thykier.net]
Sent: 11 August 2015 21:41
To: Jose Calhariz; 795...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jose Calhariz
* Package name: kibana
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Rashid Khan
* URL : http://kibana.org
* License : ???
Programming Lang: ruby, JavaScript
Description : is a friendly way to view your log
ion with 2.4.23 this is a problem of deadlocks in
>Berleckey DB.
The backport was in the hope that this was the bug #618904. But our problem is
still
present on 2.4.31.
Exists information from a "db*_stat -CA" that I will send in the next email.
Jose Calhariz
-- System Inf
afs04 kernel: EIP: [] handle_stripe+0x89d/0x173e
[raid456] SS:ESP 0068:f58d5e6c
Jun 3 01:35:56 afs04 kernel: ---[ end trace b6f4aa295d5e4948 ]---
Jun 3 01:35:56 afs04 mdadm[2376]: Fail event detected on md device /dev/md2,
component device /dev/cciss/c1d3p1
Jose Calhariz
-- Package-specifi
ied
The two logs files will be attached in the next email.
Best Regards
Jose Calhariz
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.4
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SM
u
think this information may help you in finding a better fix. I can
search for more detailed information or send the files.
Jose Calhariz
--
--
Você não sabe nada sobre uma mulher até encontrá-la num tribunal
--Norman Mailer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
The list of supported architectures was reduced, please remove the
binary package xorp from the indicated architectures.
Jose Calhariz
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.4
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architec
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 03:21:51PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
>
> Jose Calhariz wrote Tue 2010-05-18 00:43:51 +0100:
> > I am working in a new package to fix this and bug #574218. My fix for
> > this bug is all ready in SVN with revision 165.
> >
> > Other issue
to fix this and bug #574218. My fix for
this bug is all ready in SVN with revision 165.
Other issues didn't let me finish my work, until now. I think I will
have a 1.6-3 ready in the next days.
>
> Jari
>
Jose Calhariz
--
--
Ninguém vencerá a guerra dos sexos. Há muita c
The piuparts have reproduced the bug :-)
I am working on a new package for fixing this bug and the FTBFS.
Jose Calhariz
--
--
Nada é a prova de idiotas. Nisto eles são bem habilidosos...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 07:00:28PM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> Jose Calhariz writes:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 12:51:06PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> >> Bug #563944 [xorp] xorp: FTBFS /usr/sbin/snmpd: No such file or directory
> >> Severit
t;
>
The configure script was patched to work in the absence of snmpd. But
the patch didn't remove the error message. Could it be the problem is
because of "Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash"? Or because of bug
#505701.
Most probably is not because the lack of snmpd,
Jos
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 10:46:49AM +1300, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Jose Calhariz [2010.01.05.0830
> +1300]:
> > run-parts it's not Debian specific? Or exists only on some Linux
> > distributions?
>
> I don't know for sure, fraid it's Debian-s
.
run-parts it's not Debian specific? Or exists only on some Linux
distributions?
I have not changed to run-parts in the past, because I like switchconf
to be very portable and not depend on things that are unique to
Debian. That's the only reason.
Jose Calhariz
--
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 07:47:05AM +1300, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Jose Calhariz [2010.01.05.0723
> +1300]:
> > In my use cases I have find other ways for running code for
> > different "LOCATION".
>
> What do you use?
On my laptop I use switchconf
-perm +1 | sort`; do
echo -n "Executing $r .. ";
echo "- Executing $r -" >> ${logfile}
${r} ${conf} 2>&1 >> ${logfile}
^
echo "done.";
done
Jose Calhariz
--
--
O olho do homem se
This may help proceed with the bug; I have not tested it on non-amd64
> architectures, though.
Thank you. I can test the patch in a sparc machine.
The other workaround is to compile with gcc 3.4.
>
> HTH.
>
> Kumar
Jose Calhariz
--
--
O espirito e a possibilid
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:13:15AM +0200, djad...@datamax.bg wrote:
> Package: switchconf
> Version: 0.0.7-1
> Severity: normal
>
>
> missing 'rm -f ${dest_dir}/${f}.SWITCHCONF' in softlink case.
> this leave old version of files renamed with .SWITCHCONF extension.
Thank you for spotting that.
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 07:46:50PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 12:50:24PM +0000, Jose Calhariz wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 11:29:43AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 10:07:27PM +0100, Jose Calhariz wrote:
>
uot; KEMAIL="$(email)" \
KPKG_DEST_DIR="$(KPKG_DEST_DIR)" \
KPKG_MAINTAINER="$(maintainer)"\
- ARCH=$(KERNEL_ARCH) $(int_ca) \
+ ARCH=$(KERNEL_ARCH) $(CROSS_ARG)
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 11:29:43AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 10:07:27PM +0100, Jose Calhariz wrote:
> > Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686-smp
> > Version: 2.6.16-11bpo1
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > The sync speed of RAID devices is
This problem was reported to upstream as bug 797. Here is the link for
the bug report:
http://bugzilla.xorp.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=797
I am finishing the package 1.5-6 with the fix that solves this FTBFS.
José Calhariz
--
--
Antigos espíritos do mau, tranformem este FORTUNE decade
Package: xorp
Version: 1.5-5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
xorp fail to compile because the library use the option -fpic instead
of -fPIC. This difference is important for sparc, m68k and RS/6000
according to gcc documentation.
For documentation the error messages are:
/bin/sh ../libtoo
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 09:10:35PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Jose Calhariz [Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:00:16 +0100]:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 06:45:17PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > > * Jose Manuel dos Santos Calhariz [Mon, 06 Oct 2008 02:49:29 +0100]:
>
>
ing: cast from 'uint8_t*' to 'ifreq*' increases
required alignment of target type
The affected archs are:
alpha arm armel hppa ia64 mips mipsel sparc
The known non affected archs are:
i386, amd64, powerpc, s390
Jose Calhariz
-- System Information:
Debian Release: le
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 06:45:17PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Jose Manuel dos Santos Calhariz [Mon, 06 Oct 2008 02:49:29 +0100]:
>
> Hello,
>
> > The configure command have two options: --enable-shared and --with-pic
>
> > I have tried --with-pic in a i386 arch and the shared libraries didn
I am sending this email again because I have more information.
- Forwarded message from cal -
To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Claudio Martins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jorge Daniel Sequeira Matias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Definition of PIM_
tags 494223 pending
forwarded 494223 http://bugzilla.xorp.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=767
forwarded 494223 YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
thanks
I have talked with other people at my work place and it seams this bug
is on Linux kernel headers. So I have sent an email to the person
that po
Package: xorp
Version: 1.5~cvs.20080519-1
Severity: normal
It's not possible to use this version of xorp with the section
plumbing --> mfea4.
Because of this it's not possible to have multicast routing in IPv4.
This problem was first observed with the backport package for etch and
confirmed with
I need kernel-package to do a group of tasks very important. Please
maintain kernel-package 11.00x the best you can, while you rewrite the
new version.
I promise whenever I find a bug I try to find a fix and send it with the
bug report.
Jose Calhariz
--
--
O que é conservacionismo? Não
02~tp) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Really bug fix: "kernel-package: Option --cross-compile=- dont't work
+whith target modules*", thanks to Jose Calhariz (Closes: #417948).
+
+ -- Jose Calhariz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:46:55 +0100
+
kernel-package (11.001-
n Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Jose Calhariz
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-6-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=pt_PT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages openaf
tun1 vif
tun1: Missing address attribute to decode
I have tested and the source on CVS from 2008/05/19 don't have this
problem. I am preparing a new version for Debian with CVS sources
from this data.
Jose Calhariz
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unst
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 03:27:29PM +0100, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote:
> 2008/1/16, Jose Calhariz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I can do this change to get a better build target. I still believe
> > this bug was a problem with gs-common and my proof is the package was
>
as
all ready successfully recompiled on the missing archs, including s390.
Maybe is time to close this bug?
I am preparing a svn repository for xorp for upload to alioth with
some fixes all ready included, bugs 454026 453485 453637.
>
> Regards
>
> Javier
>
Jose Calhari
purposes.
Thank you for your patch. I will use it next time I package a new
version.
>
> Attached patch, taken from Ubuntu version, should implement this.
>
> Thank you.
Jose Calhariz
--
P.S. [En_US] The sig below is from my random sig-generator, which strangely
often seems
I believe the problem is related to bug #435229 or #428876.
The build failed when building xorp-doc package, that is architecture
all. This failure happened on architecture ia64 and s390. On almost
all the others architectures, besides hppa, it build without problems.
I accept advice on the
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 12:05:57PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Florian Weimer:
>
> > * Anand Kumria:
> >
> >>> about a year after we implemented some measures to avoid the entropy
> >>> issue, the bug has not been reported again in a long time. This leads
> >>> me to the conclusion that the i
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jose Calhariz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xorp
Version : 1.4
Upstream Author : International Computer Science Institute in Berkeley
* URL : http://www.xorp.org
* License : BSD Like
Programming L
can fetch from http://web.tagus.ist.utl.pt/~jose.calhariz/
I had all ready sent an email into debian-mentors requesting a sponsor
to upload the new package into Debian.
Jose Calhariz
--
P.S. [En_US] The sig below is from my random sig-generator, which strangely
often seems to pick signat
.ist.utl.pt/~jose.calhariz/
I had all ready sent an email into debian-mentors requesting a sponsor
to upload the new package into Debian.
Jose Calhariz
--
P.S. [En_US] The sig below is from my random sig-generator, which strangely
often seems to pick signatures which are apropriate to t
Package: amanda-server
Version: 1:2.5.1p1-2.1
Severity: normal
I have a dumptype called "skip" with strategy skip. But when I use
this dumptype I errors parsing the disklist, tipical of memory
corruption and in some cases is detected by glib.
Detail:
When disklist have many entries with skip st
Package: kernel-package
Version: 10.068
Severity: important
Tags: none
When doing cross-compilation of kernel and externel modules, I found
that --cross-compile=- option is ignored with targets modules*. The
compilation fails because it tries to use the "-gcc" compiler.
Example:
cd /usr/src/lin
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 08:34:21PM +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> Package: switchconf
> Version: 0.0.5.1-1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
>
> Hello again,
>
> I've developed a small init script for switchconf which allows to
> switch the configuration at boot time. In order to do this you ju
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 08:10:37PM +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> Package: switchconf
> Version: 0.0.5.1-1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
>
> Hello,
>
> as I've started to use switchconf in order to configure a chroot
> environment, using ln to apply configurations doesn't work for
> me. So
Package: debianutils
Version: 2.8.4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
When I use the -d flag, I would like that savelog could remove the old
files. I submit an experimental patch to add this wishlist feature.
This way the oldest versions of the log file are removed and remain
the $cycle newest files
Package: linux-image-2.6.17-1-686
Version: 2.6.17-1
Followup-For: Bug #375742
I have installed a unstable machine to confirm the existence of the
problem. It's the same I have reported above.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500,
rnel 2.6.8 the behaviour
seems to be correct, the RAID driver honors speed_limit_max.
Jose Calhariz
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages linux-image-2.
I believe I have the same problem. One server of mine stopped to send
email 3 days ago. Today when I investigated if everything was
allrigth I found many exim4 process processing email, and some
zombies.
I have killed them all tried to restart exim4 to no avail.
I have started exim4 with "exim
I have updated to linux-image-2.6.12-1-686-smp from testing, and now
the snmpd and the kernel works without a problem. On this machine I
can use testing kernels.
José Calhariz
--
Não vamos nos dispersar!
A não ser que alguém tenha comido ovo cozido.
signature.asc
Description: Digital si
Package: snmpd
Version: 5.1.2-6.2
Followup-For: Bug #243438
My machine is a router and firewall with 3 vlans on eth0 and IPv6,
this snmpwalk crashes the snmpd and generates a oops:
snmpwalk -c public -v2c localhost .1
SNMPv2-MIB::sysDescr.0 = STRING: Linux xena 2.6.8-2-686 #1 Thu May 19 17:53:30
0ifdown.sh will always be executed before 20pcmcia.sh
> (...)
I have accepted your patch and made available a new version of the
package on my personal page,
http://web.tagus.ist.utl.pt/~jose.calhariz/ that closes the 3 bugs on
BTS. #332916, #332918, #332920
If I don't hear anything agai
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 03:59:17PM +0200, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> Package: switchconf
> Version: 0.0.4-1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> $ switchconf -list
> find: warning: you have specified the -maxdepth option after a
> non-option argument -type, but options are not positional (-ma
e.
>
> I suggest the patch:
>
> (...)
You are rigth, I accept the patch and in the next days I will make
available a new version with your fix.
Jose Calhariz
--
A lei é como uma cerca. Quando é forte, a gente passa por baixo. Quando é
fraca, a gente passa por cima
--Corone
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 09:02:50PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 06:57:30PM +0100, Jose Calhariz wrote:
> > afs is a remote filesystem, like nfs or coda, suported by Debian. Could
> > you please add to the file /usr/lib/tiger/systems/
; = "smbfs" ] && LOCAL=1
+ [ "$1" = "afs" ] && LOCAL=1
[ "$1" = "coda" ] && LOCAL=1
TIA
Jose Calhariz
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=C, [E
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 08:43:07AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Jose Calhariz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I have now one machine that is compiling the linux kernel, on an openafs
> > volume, for 24 hours. Until now I didn't get any error from the
> > com
Here in the University other machines with the same NIC, have
the same problems with newer kernels.
I have tried using netperf to see if the NIC stops to send or receive
network traffic, but it worked without problems for 12 hours in each test.
The best I can do to reproduce the problem is: In o
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 09:50:46AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Jose Calhariz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Package: openafs-modules-2.4.27-2-686-smp
> > Version: 1.3.81-3+4
> > Severity: important
>
> > This month I started to test the stability of the
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 11:32:36AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Jose Calhariz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Debian stable with openafs-client 1.3.81-3sarge1 and
> > openafs-modules 1.3.82-2+2.4.27-10 and kernel 2.4.27-2-686-smp I see
> > AFS_VMA_CLOSE messag
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 05:17:06PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Jose Calhariz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I had tested 1.3.81 with kernel 2.6.8, but now I believe that my tests
> > where not heavy enough. I will try 1.3.82 and see if something is
> > diferen
, just ask.
Jose Calhariz
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686-smp
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686-smp depends on:
ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2Th
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 01:44:39PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Jose Calhariz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 11:47:53AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> >> I'm working on a much newer OpenAFS package based on 1.3.87. A variety
> >>
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 11:47:53AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Jose Calhariz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This month I started to test the stability of the openafs-client and
> > openafs-modules on sarge with Debian kernel 2.4.27-2-686-smp. This week
>
64] []
Aug 11 17:37:50 bcksrv kernel:
Aug 11 17:37:50 bcksrv kernel: Code: c6 05 ff ff ff ff 2a 83 c4 1c c3 90 8d 74
26 00 b8 d1 1b d3
The modules where compiled using source from Debian sarge.
Jose Calhariz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
65 matches
Mail list logo
