On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 01:44:39PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Jose Calhariz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 11:47:53AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > > >> I'm working on a much newer OpenAFS package based on 1.3.87. A variety > >> of bugs have been fixed since the version currently in unstable, so > >> once that's in the archive, I'll ask you to test with it instead and > >> see if that helps. > > > Until then, is better to use version 1.2.13 ? > > I honestly don't know; I'm using 1.3.82 under heavy load with no problems > at all, so something is different about your environment than mine and I'm > not sure what it would be. There's just been so much fixed since 1.3.82 > that it probably isn't worth intensive debugging before trying 1.3.87. > > I hope to have the new version uploaded within a week. >
I had tested 1.3.81 with kernel 2.6.8, but now I believe that my tests
where not heavy enough. I will try 1.3.82 and see if something is
diferent. For me using Debian stable everywhere is very important.
But stability of openafs is more important.
Jose Calhariz
--
O coracao e o relogio da vida. Quem nao o consulta, anda
naturalmente fora do tempo.
-- Machado de Assis
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
