On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 08:43:07AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Jose Calhariz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I have now one machine that is compiling the linux kernel, on an openafs > > volume, for 24 hours. Until now I didn't get any error from the > > compilation or message from the kernel. That is very good and much > > better than with 1.3.81/2 modules. This client have openafs-client from > > sarge (1.3.81) and openafs-modules from unstable (1.3.87) > > Excellent. Should I go ahead and close this bug as fixed in 1.3.87-1? > (I'm guessing that a backport to sarge will be in order at some point, > probably via backports.org since I doubt it would meet the criteria for > inclusion in stable. Hopefully etch will be fast.) >
I had run more tests whithout any error or warning. For me you may close the bug. José Calhariz -- dROGA!!oNDE ESTA O cAPSLOCK??
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature