Package: radicale
Version: 3.2.3-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
some suggestions to improve the README.Debian:
1.) Use consistent servername for uwsgi example.
debian/examples/apache2-vhost.conf has "Define _HOST event.${_DOMAIN}".
But in radicale.README.Debian there's "events.example.or
Hi,
while preparing another related bugreport I reread this bug and its clone:
#1017764 radicale: enable apache2/nginx integration using debconf
#1017824 radicale: Readme and uwsgi improvements
I think you closed the wrong bug in radicale (3.1.8-2):
* improve README.Debian;
closes: bug
Package: radicale
Version: 3.2.3-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
a few suggestions to update radicale's package dependencies and improve
related documentation:
1.) Remove Suggests: libapache2-mod-proxy-uwsgi
Since at least buster (oldoldstable) libapache2-mod-proxy-uwsgi
was a transitio
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Control: found -1 10.1.30-1
Hi all, hi Markus,
I'm not the bugreporter, but jumping in anyway.
On 01 Jul 2023, Markus Koschany wrote:
> There is a difference between the operating system user and
> home directory and the applications' home directory.
[...]
> You ha
control: retitle -1 winetricks: architecture detection mechanism (commit
#9ca7a68b) broken
On 08.02.24 16:02, Alex Volkov wrote:
as the architecture detection mechanism (commit #9ca7a68b) checks $1
argument, it views the "--gui" parameter in the .desktop file as a
filename, which leads to appe
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On 07.04.23 15:49, Thomas Dorner wrote:
While setting up a new Wine environment winetricks aborted with the
following error:
I can't reproduce this issue. What steps exactly did you issue that failed?
With the same packages installed I successfully did the fol
Hi Paul
On 09.03.23 15:50, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 19 Feb 2023 18:17:39 -0600 Austin English
wrote:
Yes, it's arguably a bug in winetricks. Film what I gather upstream,
it's also not yet fully supported.
On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 17:10:47 +0100 Jens Reyer
wrote:
ftr: I just
On 20.02.23 01:17, Austin English wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2023, 17:33 Jens Reyer <mailto:jre.wine...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Yes, it's arguably a bug in winetricks. Film what I gather upstream,
it's also not yet fully supported.
I would advise reverting for now. At least u
On 19.02.23 21:45, Floris Renaud wrote:
Isn't this a bug in winetricks? When Wine is compiled the new way
(--enable-archs=i386,x86_64), there isn't, as far as I know, a wine64 file.
From
https://github.com/Winetricks/winetricks/blob/master/src/winetricks#L3113
---
# Wrapper around winetrick
Source: wine
Version: 8.0~repack-4
Severity: serious
Hi Mike,
I wasn't aware of this, but it seems indeed that /usr/bin/wine64 is
required somehow: winetricks fails to start with 8.0~repack-4, but works
with 8.0~repack-2.
I don't understand yet what's exactly going wrong (winetricks complain
On 12.02.23 10:53, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
The -stable suffix was added for the Debian alternatives system. While
I don't expect an issue with adding an /usr/lib/wine/wine64-stable
link, I wonder if the whole issue is really a bug (still probably a
regression, which I can't comment on since I'm no
Hi Renato,
as pointed out your packages would need more work to match the Debian
standards, simply uploading upstream's version is not enough. But I'm
already working on this version, just need to solve some verification
issues.
Greets
jre
On 07.02.23 14:22, Bernhard Übelacker wrote:
Dear Maintainer,
if one creates this wine64-stable just as a link to wine64,
then `wine64-stable wineboot` would start to work.
# ln -s wine64 /usr/lib/wine/wine64-stable
Kind regards,
Bernhard
(rr)
692 execv( argv[1], argv + 1 );
(rr) prin
control: found -1 thunderbird/1:91.6.2-1
control: found -1 thunderbird/1:91.7.0-2
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi Simon and all,
On 27.03.22 14:16, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I think this is a description of the same bug as #948691. If that's
> the case, then it should be fixed by thunderbird vers
On 20.03.22 17:16, Jens Reyer wrote:
> export WINE=/opt/wine-staging/bin/wineserver
> export WINESERVER=/opt/wine-staging/bin/wineserver
That should have been:
export WINE=/opt/wine-staging/bin/wine
export WINESERVER=/opt/wine-staging/bin/wineserver
On 04.07.21 14:51, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quoting Jens Reyer (2021-07-04 14:36:13)
>> On 08.04.21 22:47, Johannes 'josch' Schauer wrote:
>>> a recent threat on debian-devel [1] revealed that winetricks falls into the
>>> same
On 08.04.21 22:47, Johannes 'josch' Schauer wrote:
> Package: winetricks
> Version: 0.0+20210206-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> a recent threat on debian-devel [1] revealed that winetricks falls into
> the same category as other packages that are happily sitting in main.
> Specifically, winetri
Hi
On 25.04.21 16:27, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> bullseye users would also benefit more from wine 6.0 in
> bullseye-backports
[not commenting on the whole issue]
I maintained the wine backports in the past, but stepped down
(https://lists.debian.org/debian-wine/2020/09/msg7.html).
But I agree tha
* Add upstream patch allowing using --force to ignore the sha256sum check.
+
+ -- Jens Reyer Tue, 13 Apr 2021 22:05:56 +0200
+
winetricks (0.0+20210206-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release 20210206. (Closes: #961205, #981660)
diff -Nru
winetricks-0.0+20210206/debian/patc
Unfortunately the hashes already changed twice since your report. But
upstream already accepted my PR for the latest change (awesome!).
Uploading this now. I hope the hashes stay stable now for a while. I'll
request an unblock for Debian Bullseye then.
control: severity -1 important
Hi,
thanks for your report. I'll upload a fix soon.
Since vcrun2019 is a quite important verb I'll try to get the fix in
Debian bullseye.
Greets
jre
On 04.04.21 18:34, Bernhard wrote:
> Package: winetricks
> Version: 0.0+20210206-1
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
>
On 12.03.21 11:40, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Unpacking libwine-development:amd64 (5.6-1) over (4.2-4+b1) ...
> dpkg: error processing archive
> /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-mfCwgB/93-libwine-development_5.6-1_amd64.deb
> (--unpack):
>trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/wine-development/wineserver', wh
Package: wine-development
Version: 5.5-3
Severity: normal
Hi,
since 5.5-3 libwine-development misses the dependencies (Recommends) on
dlopen'ed libraries. That version (git commit
753fa038bd903b7c5c91b6df08d52409b3eb67ae) had some changes in
debian/rules and introduced a new config2sonames scri
control: tags -1 +patch
Hi firefox maintainer(s),
Thunderbird was also affected by this, and got fixed in #946588.
In the meantime I successfully used the workaround to remove the
date/timestamp from compatibility.ini. (It got readded with a new value
the next time I started firefox-esr, so I'
control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream
Hi
Hans Leidekker wrote https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47724#c22
> This might be fixed by cce9a5f124ae6d3fffcc7772cab6523f09a1e3d1,
please test.
I rebuilt wine-development with upstream merged at
cce9a5f124ae6d3fffcc7772cab6523f09a1e3d1:
"winetricks do
On 02.11.19 00:55, Alistair Leslie-Hughes wrote:
> Is there any chance you could use version 19.11 that was just release?
Definitely, I'll prepare that upload shortly.
But I still lack the permissions to upload the package (working on it).
Greets
jre
control: tags -1 pending
Hi
On 13.09.19 23:47, Shmerl wrote:
> Please update faudio to latest upstream version. They normally come out once a
> month,
> so it would be good if they could be packaged in Debian as well.
Thanks! I'm working on this. I joined as an uploader and prepared
19.10-1.
Package: parcimonie
Version: 0.11.0-1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi
please see attached patch for fixing some minor typos.
I also added a quick documentation of the XDG autostart.
Thanks for parcimonie.
Greets
jre
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers testing
A
Package: parcimonie
Version: 0.11.0-1
Severity: minor
Hi,
README.Debian documents the use of gnupg-curl. However this package has been
removed from Debian since stretch (oldstable). AFAIR its completely superseded
by dirmngr in gnupg 2, which parcimonie depends on. So you could just remove
the
Package: git-buildpackage
Version: 0.9.15
Severity: minor
File: /usr/share/doc/git-buildpackage/manual-html/gbp.import.convert.html
Tags: patch
Hi Guido
The git command in this paragraph:
Upstream sources on a branch
If the upstream sources are already on a separate branch, things are pret
Hi Allan,
In https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47724#c16 you wrote:
> Adding "--without-mingw" to "configure" fixes this issue.
Up to 4.11-1 (the version that you reported the bug against) the Debian
packages had a build-conflicts against gcc-mingw-w64-i686 and
gcc-mingw-w64-x86-64. I chan
Hi
> I was wondering if somebody is working on this
AFAIK noone on wine-gecko (but I'd be happy to be wrong). For wine-mono
there was some work half a year ago, but I haven't seen any results.
> In the
> past the wine in Debian would at least try to download wine gecko from
> official
> binar
Hi Enrico
> I tried adding this to ~/.pbuilderrc, but it gets ignored:
>
> OTHERMIRROR="deb http://incoming.debian.org/debian-buildd buildd-unstable"
Typo? I guess "main" is missing.
Do you "apt update" later?
> So I put this in ~/.pbuilder/hooks/D09incoming:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> echo "deb h
jre
>From c786b4727f3345e671e9d32d36f1a01c0c9c7a22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jens Reyer
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 17:27:58 +0200
Subject: Mark shared libraries and development packages as "Multi-Arch: same"
This adds the "Multi-Arch: same" header to the following packages:
libusrsctp1
libusrsctp-d
jre
>From 09bc71493bff42010f143a009b7d5f147ea04f1c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jens Reyer
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 16:56:07 +0200
Subject: Mark shared libraries and development packages as "Multi-Arch: same"
This adds the "Multi-Arch: same" header to the following packages:
li
Package: debmake-doc
Version: 1.14-1
Severity: normal
Hi
in "5.5.3. binNMU safe" there's:
The dependency defined in the debian/control file among binary packages
from the same source package should be safe for the binNMU. This needs
attention if there are both “Architecture: any” and “Archi
control: tags -1 pending
On 04.08.19 01:04, Jens Reyer wrote:
> Gving it another thought: just install wine and call /usr/bin/wine64
> (not wine). This doesn't cause the warning about wine32 afaict. So
> problem solved for you!?
Turned out this isn't true: on updating the w
Hi dkg
On 02.08.19 18:00, Jens Reyer wrote:
> On 16.07.19 16:48, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> So if you see a better way around this, so that i can use
>> wine in autopkgtest more easily, please don't hesitate to suggest
>> it)
Gving it another thought: just inst
Hi dkg and wine-team,
On 16.07.19 16:48, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> wine64(1) says:
>
> WINESERVER
> Specifies the path and name of the wineserver binary. If not
> set, Wine will try to load /usr/lib/wine/wineserver, and if this
> doesn't exist
control: reassign -1 libpython3.5-minimal 3.5.3-1+deb9u1
@doko: reassigning, only affects stretch, but might be rc. See below.
Hi Olivier
thanks for your feedback!
> trying to rebuild khronos-api (version from backport) with pbuilder on a
> Debian Stretch, it fails with:
I just successfully r
On 06.06.19 22:24, Jens Reyer wrote:
> The referenced ChangeLog was:
[...]
I missed a second entry:> chmd_read_headers(): a CHM file name beginning
"::" but shorter
> than 33 bytes will lead to reading past the freshly-allocated
> name buffer - checks for specific control
Hi all,
first off, many thanks for your efforts here, Paul!
On 06.06.19 15:54, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 06-06-2019 04:23, Marc Dequènes (duck) wrote:
>> I'm not committing to this plan for the above stated reasons. I also
>> feels uncomfortable uploading with a know security problem, so unless
>>
on (Closes: #912687).
+
+ -- Jens Reyer Sat, 01 Jun 2019 14:32:06 +0200
+
1.) Versioning and targeted suite
This proposal reverts the upstream version back from 0.10 (unstable) to
0.8 (testing), therefore the "new" upstream version 0.10.1+really0.8.
For building I just symlinked the 0.8 o
control: retitle -1 binNMU: please rebuild wine-development against
unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2
control: reassign -1 release.debian.org
Hi,
On 11.05.19 20:25, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> On 09-05-2019 22:54, Jens Reyer wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> The files built with
Hi Paul, hi wine-team
On 09.05.19 12:26, Paul Gevers wrote:
> retitle 928014 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2
> reassign 928014 wine-development
> usertag 928014 unicode-data-12
> thanks
>
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:23:17 +0100 Alastair McKinstry
> wrote:
>> Package: release.debia
Hi,
that won't work, because wine_4.0-1 has a build-depends on unicode-data
(<< 12) (see my mail in the 'Handling Japanese new era "令和 (Reiwa)"'
thread). I'll upload wine_4.0-2 shortly, closing this bug here with
that version.
btw, wine-development_4.2-4 already was changed, so the other Wine
re
cotrol: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Konstantin,
On 15.04.19 15:11, Konstantin Demin wrote:
> Source: wine-development
> Version: 4.2-2
>
> wineserver fails to setup it's directory when /run/user/${pid} is not
> available due to buggy patch.
> please fix debian/patches/fixes/temporary-directory.patch:
On 03.04.19 09:05, Marc Dequènes (duck) wrote:
> I already asked for an unblock, explaining the situation (like why it
> was blocked out of testing, why the recent fixes…), but it was rejected
> without any comment on my rational:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923885
Strang
I sent the full debdiff as xz (70kb), but erroneously to #926123.
Not resending, sorry and thanks.
Attached the debdiff as xz.
I also explicitly forwarded my mail to the maintainer, because I don't
know if x-debbugs-cc worked.
libmspack_0.8-1_0.10.1-1.diff.xz
Description: application/xz
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
block -1 by 926118
Hi
Please unblock package cabextract
I'm not the maintainer of cabextract, but of winetricks which is affected by
#914263 (cabextract: -F option doesn't work correctly
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi
Please unblock package libmspack
I'm not the maintainer of libmspack (in CC), but of winetricks which is
affected by #912687 (libmspack0: Regression when extracting cabinets using -F
op
Hi,
libmspack in unstable fixes a bug in cabextract (#914263
cabextract: -F option doesn't work correctly.) which affects winetricks.
But cabextract and libmspack don't migrate because of this bug here.
This issue is already fixed upstream, but afaics not released yet. Do
you know if this will
Source: vkd3d
Version: 1.1-2
Severity: normal
[resend to the bts]
Hi Mike
On 02.02.19 08:56, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 10:38 PM Jens Reyer wrote:
>> vkd3d has no runtime dependency on libvulkan1 or any other vulkan
>> related packages. So with the cur
HI
On 27.01.19 22:39, Axel Huebl wrote:
> I am using wine 3.0.3 from stretch-backports.
>
> With the latest update (v1.6.0) of the reMarkable desktop GUI, the upgrade
> breaks on an unimplemented function.
>
> https://remarkable.com
> https://remarkable.engineering
>
> Wine 3.1.0 fixes this
Source: vkd3d
Version: 1.1-2
Severity: normal
Hi Mike,
vkd3d fails to build in stretch with libvulkan-dev 1.0.39.0+dfsg1-1, but
succeeds with 1.1.70+dfsg1-1~bpo9+1 which is in stretch-backports.
I didn't investigate exactly which version is required, but just suggest
something like this in d/co
control: found -1 git/1:2.20.1-1
control: reopen -1 !
Hi Jonathan,
On 17.12.18 02:24, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> git (1:2.20.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> [...]
>* package git-gui: Suggests: meld for mergetool support (thx Jens
> Reyer; closes: #707790).
Package: radicale
Followup-For: Bug #829119
Hi
committing to git works here (radicale 2.1.11-2 and previous versions
from experimental).
python-dulwich / python3-dulwich is not needed anymore for this.
$ grep hook /etc/radicale/config
hook = ([ -d .git ] || git init) && ([ -e .gitignore ] || pri
Hi Van
On 21.12.18 12:33, Van wrote:
> TreePad X Enterprise 12GB (single user) generates the following error
> upon startup using WINE version 4.x:
> List index out of bounds (-2147483632)
I can reproduce this, the error happens after clicking "Cancel" in the
"TreePad quick start" window. Did yo
27;d be especially happy about suggestions for better wording.
jre
>From 9413ec1be8ed1ca3c3daf5668c529ec2a1805a86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jens Reyer
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 22:20:43 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Add disable-automatic-selfupdate.patch.
Disable automatic version check and s
Package: apt-cacher-ng
Version: 3.2-1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi,
the little text files are snippets, not snippeds.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/snippet
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/snipped
Patch attached.
Thanks
jre
diff --git a/INSTALL b/INSTALL
index da32cbe
Package: apt-cacher-ng
Version: 3.2-1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi,
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/apt-cacher-ng believes that the git repo
is outdated, because it's looking at branch master instead of debian/sid.
To fix either adapt the salsa project, or debian/control.
Patch for the latter
On 28.10.18 19:53, Austin English wrote:
> For testing, using a C# hello world is easy:
[...]
For completeness, someone else from winehq just told me (and it seems
they would really be happy to see wine-mono packaged as that would ease
their support burden):
.NET apps that work with wine-mono are
On 28.10.18 18:45, Alexandre Viau wrote:
> On 2018-10-28 12:49 p.m., Jens Reyer wrote:
>> great to see you working on wine-mono (although personally I never
>> needed it).
>
> Is this because you use Microsoft's proprietary implementation?
I don't use Wine very of
[ Dropping debian-wine (=maintainer, gets bugreports anyway), and skitt
(member of debian-wine) from CC ]
Hi Alexandre
great to see you working on wine-mono (although personally I never
needed it). I guess you'll put this under the wine-team umbrella?
On 28.10.18 01:22, Alexandre Viau wrote:
Hi Mike
On 10/14/18 2:36 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Welcome back!
Thanks, much appreciated! btw, I'm just working on 3.0.3-1.
> Wrap and sort is itself the original source of the extra diff being
> seen and will continue to be in the future.
Wrap and sort has a deterministic result. We cou
Package: wine-development
Version: 3.17-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream, fixed-upstream
wine-development 3.17-1 ftbfs on arm64:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=wine-development&arch=arm64&ver=3.17-1&stamp=1539395513&raw=0
It looks like upstream already fixed this in 3.18 with
Package: wine-development
Version: 3.17-1
Severity: normal
Hi Mike,
in the recent uploads you re-sorted the dependencies in d/control.in
once again. Each time this happens this takes some of my time when I
sync the src:wine packaging, or dig into issues that exist only in one
of our or other pac
control: found -1 3.16-1
Hi Anton,
I assume this also affects the stable version of wine (3.0.2-3), since
that was also compiled with gcc 8.1. Can you please confirm?
On 2018-09-17 03:37:11 CDT Anton Vorobyov wrote in
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45199#c40
> Debian maintainers comp
Hi Carsten
On 7/16/18 8:39 AM, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
[...]
> the root for these problems seem to be solved by a recent gpg update, at
> least since gnupg 2.2.8 the segfault of TB don't happen anymore. We can
> close this report now I guess.
Yes, you're right. I still had a few infrequent cras
On 7/6/18 5:11 PM, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Source: unicode-data
> Version: 11.0.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> Control: affects -1 gucharmap libxmlada utf8proc wine wine-development
>
> Hi Maintainer
>
> The recent upload of unicode-data 11 causes several packages to FTBFS in
> unstable.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "khronos-api"
* Package name: khronos-api
Version : 4.6+git20180514-1~bpo9+1
Upstream Author : The Khronos Group Inc.
* URL : https://www.opengl.org/registry
*
On 05/26/2018 06:37 PM, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> On Sat, 26 May 2018, Jens Reyer wrote:
>> thanks again for the quick setup of the new debian-wine mailinglist.
>>
>> Now a user requested to read it as digest. I've seen that a few other
>> mailing lists are provide
Package: lists.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
thanks again for the quick setup of the new debian-wine mailinglist.
Now a user requested to read it as digest. I've seen that a few other
mailing lists are provided also in this form, e.g. debian-devel-digest.
Can you do the same for debian-wine?
On 20.05.2018 02:20, Javier Serrano Polo wrote:
> El ds 19 de 05 de 2018 a les 23:39 +0200, Jens Reyer va escriure:
>> I definitely want the well-established system command
>> "update-alternatives" to be used.
>
> What are the requirements?
> "update-altern
Hi,
sorry I thought I had answered to this.
On 17.01.2018 17:56, Javier Serrano Polo wrote:
> X-Debbugs-CC: k...@codeweavers.com
>
> El dc 17 de 01 de 2018 a les 15:48 +0100, Jens Reyer va escriure:
>> The second line is about the master, we always need it. And I want the
>&g
On 19.05.2018 17:46, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Niels Thykier:
>> On Sat, 19 May 2018 16:36:46 +0200 Jens Reyer wrote:
>>> Package: debhelper
>>> Version: 11.2.1
>>> Severity: normal
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I&#
Hi,
just a minor typo I guess, absolutely no review, sorry:
"If the package builder supports the Rules-Requires-Root field and want
to enable the feature"
s/want/wants
Greets
jre
Package: debhelper
Version: 11.2.1
Severity: normal
Hi,
I've run into this with src:wine:
$ grep Rules debian/control*
debian/control:Rules-Requires-Root: no
debian/control.in:Rules-Requires-Root: no
$ quilt push -a
$ ./debian/rules binary
[...]
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/jens/development
On 19.05.2018 12:34, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Mattia Rizzolo:
>> On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 06:13:39AM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>>> Similar to #891504, emails sent directly to a package tracker address,
>>> for example chromium-brow...@tracker.debian.org, are discarded instead
>>> of being relayed
control: block 898810 by 869233
On 16.05.2018 02:40, oiaohm wrote:
> I was looking over patches that are being added to wine.
Again, thanks for doing that.
> I stumbled on the
> https://sources.debian.org/patches/wine/3.0-1/revert_opengl46.patch/ and when
> I
> look at it is in the fact of no
ll discussion in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-wine/):
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Jens Reyer wrote:
On 13.09.2016 02:47, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> font-divbyzero.patch
>> description: avoid divide-by-zero condition for certain font files and
>> warn about it
>>
Hi all,
On 4/28/18 5:46 PM, Jens Reyer wrote:
A1) @lists.debian.org
Since the mailing list is also for discussion and coordination (not only
automatic mails) I think we qualify to use e.g.
wine-team@lists.d.o
I filed #898066 against lists.debian.org, starting a request for a
debian
Package: lists.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hi listmasters,
please accept the former mailing list
Debian Wine Party
on lists.debian.org.
I'm not formally requesting this yet, since I'd like to first have some
official endorsement from the old team admins on alioth, and some
general fee
Package: src:wine
Version: 3.6-1
Severity: important
Hi,
so pkg-wine-pa...@lists.alioth.debian.org doesn't work anymore since
about 2 weeks. The new maintainer address in wine's maintainer field
w...@tracker.debian.org
also doesn't work. Although I'm subscribed to the wine package at
tr
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wine"
* Package name: wine
Version : 3.0-1~bpo9+1
Upstream Author : see AUTHORS file
* URL : winehq.org
* License : LGPL-2.1+
Section : oth
On 02/10/2018 06:58 PM, Joerg Schiermeier, Bielefeld/Germany wrote:
> Jens Reyer wrote:
>> Still, I'd love to understand what this bug was about.
> Maybe I'm too "German":
Maybe, welcome in the club ;)
> in WinHQ.orgs website both version were set to 3.0 wh
[Adding the bugreport back in the address field]
On 02/06/2018 06:56 PM, Joerg Schiermeier, Bielefeld/Germany wrote:
> WineHQ | Debian Package
>
> stable version == wine
> devel. version == wine-development
>
> Is this correct?
Yes, that's correct. And
On 02/02/2018 08:10 PM, Joerg Schiermeier, Bielefeld/Germany wrote:
> the package version of 'wine-development' is lower than the version of
> 'normal' wine:
>
> wine-development: 3.0~rc6-1
> wine: 3.0-1
>
> Since January 18th, 2018 until today the WineHQ versions were set to v3.0.
> This was t
control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/Winetricks/winetricks/issues/912
> I won't be able to fix upstream for a few weeks, but I've filled a bug in
> the meantime:
>
> https://github.com/Winetricks/winetricks/issues/912
There have been a few patches upstream, so I guess we'll have a solution
s
+
+ Warning: This increases the risk of inadvertently launching Windows malware,
+ so please make sure that you understand the security risks before installing
+ this package.
+
+ For more information please refer to Wine's README.debian.
+
+ -- Jens Reyer Sun, 28 Jan 2018 18:51:42 +0100
Source: wine-development
Version: 3.0~rc3-2
Severity: serious
Forwarded: https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44365
Tags: upstream
gcc -c -o relay.o relay.c -I. -I../../include -D__WINESRC__ -D_NTSYSTEM_
-D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall \
-pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wem
On 01/10/2018 09:07 PM, Javier Serrano Polo wrote:
> El dc 10 de 01 de 2018 a les 19:51 +0100, Jens Reyer va escriure:
>> I'm not sure if you suggest to make libwine (instead of wine) the
>> alternatives-master for all Wine packages - I think that wouldn't work,
>>
Hi Javier and Mike,
On 06/17/2017 11:16 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
>> Please add a libwine.so.1 alternative to libwine packages, and
>> libwine.so to libwine-dev ones.
>
> There are no reverse dependencies of libwine, so it is not clear to me
> how this would actual
On 12/09/2017 11:01 PM, Rogério Brito wrote:
> For the benefit of other programs (thinking here especially of evince/atril
> and other PDF viewers, but also for people that need to collaborate with
> Windows users in an office environment), please put the Tahoma clone and
> other fonts under /usr/s
control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Michal
On 12/30/2017 03:07 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> Package: wine
> Version: 1.8.7-2
> Severity: important
>
> Hello,
>
> once you install wine text files open in notepad, pictures, PDFs and
> HTML files in winebrowser.
>
> This breaks the desktop integratio
control: reassign -1 src:wine-gecko-2.24
control: affects -1 src:wine-development
Control: merge -1 824193
> On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 15:11:46 +0100, "Joerg Schiermeier, Bielefeld/Germany"
> wrote:
>> So: there is something wrong with wine-gecko I guess. This isn't new in
>> wine-development because
On 11/26/2017 09:19 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> From: Jens Reyer
>> Clearly something wrong here, buster/sid mixed with stable. I'm closing
>> the bug because mixed systems are not supported.
>
> This is a common misconception about Debian. Mixed suites are a
>
Oh, and about the inconsistency: yes, the wine wrapper /usr/bin/wine
defaults to the loader (from wine32) /usr/lib/wine/wine, while the
wineserver wrapper defaults to /usr/lib/wine/wineserver64. But that's
absolutely correct:
Even if you run a 32-bit prefix wineserver64 is the right choice, you
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi
this is usually because of version mismatches between amd64 libraries
and their i386 counterpart. Since Wine depends on *many* libraries which
need to come from *both* an 32-bit architecture and an 64-bit
architecture users are often hit by this issue.
To figure out
1 - 100 of 355 matches
Mail list logo
