On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 09:38:27AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes:
>
> Before we make changes here, I think we need to understand the blast
> radius. Maybe someone can do some work in UDD to figure out how many
> packages would be affected if we were to tighten up the syntax here
On Sun, Jun 15, 2025 at 12:04:15AM +0200, Oliver M. Schode wrote:
> Package: popularity-contest
> Followup-For: Bug #1089172
>
> There is systemd-cron, which by the way provides cron-daemon anyway,
> although that could have been made more explicit for those unaware.
> Thing is, it's also a crutch
On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 11:47:08AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> It was always my intent that this field would in be a subset of
> RFC822/5322 sender/recipient field formt.
>
> We should never have diverged from 822 here. So that we ever
> permitted commas in the name part was an egregious mistake.
On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 04:44:21PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
> ==8><
> The package ships an executable file in /usr/lib.
>
> Please move the file to /usr/libexec.
>
> With policy revision 4.1.5, D
On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 01:56:21PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> These executables are not meant to be used from shell as GAP-guava does not
> install its executables in /usr/bin .
> By contrast, GAP-nq installs its executable in /usr/bin, so GAP-nq has a
> different scheme.
> So the guava execut
On Sat, Jun 07, 2025 at 01:12:14AM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> The GAP package guava installs a couple of binary executables.
> As such these executables are architecture dependent, so they can not be put
> in /usr/share/gap/pkg/guava/bin/ ,
> which is architecture independent. However they are
On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 11:11:07PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hi, finally I found some time to write a working patch.
>
>
> > > I am ready to write such a C patch. Is that okay with you ?
> >
> > Depends on messy it is, I guess ? The problem is that once packages
> > start to use that patch,
On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 01:10:37PM +0300, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> > > By rewriting the policy you can make it suddenly be "correct" to ignore
> > > basic assumptions the entire Debian archive is built upon.
> >
> > This is not correct: the entire Debian archive is not built on this
> > assumption.
reassign 1106446 nlohmann-json3-dev
reassign 1106447 nlohmann-json3-dev
reassign 1106448 nlohmann-json3-dev
quit
Dear Gianfranco and Hubert,
I am reassigning the FTBFS to nlohmann-json3-dev.
The FTBFS need to be fixed by a new version of nlohmann-json3-dev
that restore the ABI, not by breaking th
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 12:06:00AM +0100, Richard Lewis wrote:
> Package: debbugs
> Version: 2.6.2
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi,
>
> could you make the bts support a \ as a continuation character so
> commands can be split over lines?
>
> some software wrap long lines at spaces, which makes it im
On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 10:42:42AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 4.7.2.0
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering whether we should either allow multiple Homepage fields
> in debian/control or have this as a multivalue, allowing mor than one
> homepage to b
On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 04:40:30PM +, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Package: src:xeus-gp
> Version: 0.1.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
>
> Dear maintainer:
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
>
> -
Package: nlohmann-json3-dev
Version: 3.12.0
Severity: important
Dear Gianfranco and Hubert,
nlohmann-json3-dev 3.12 is breaking xeus ABI in a way that cannot be fixed
because nlohmann-json3-dev hardcode the version in type names which
appear as function argument of C++ symbols in the library.
S
On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 07:44:51PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> El 24/5/25 a las 19:17, Mathias Gibbens escribió:
> > control: retitle -1 nlohmann-json3 3.12.0-1 causing FTBFS in openrct2
> > control: reassign -1 nlohmann-json3 3.12.0-1
> > control: affects -1 src:openrct2
> >
> >Version 3.12
On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 04:40:30PM +, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Package: src:xeus-gp
> Version: 0.1.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
>
> Dear maintainer:
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
Hello Santiago,
nlohmann-json3-dev has a we
On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 08:39:58PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Wed, 07 May 2025 at 20:57:15 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > By changing SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH in what is purported to be a 'binary-only
> > upload'
> > we are breaking the reproducible build semant
On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 05:58:11PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> My take is that it is a bug to use SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH to populate the
> timestamp inside a man page. This is just one of many symptoms that
> will arise from trying to use SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH in an upstream context.
You are assuming
On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 08:08:11PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Russ Allbery writes:
>
> > In particular, what "timestamp inside artifacts from the source code"
> > do you believe I should use? I do not have any special access to the
> > upstream release date. Or is the argument that the upstr
On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 01:12:43AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> I think we have to consider test target in rules differently from build
> targets as the effect on these on the final binaries we ship is different.
>
> I agree the current policy fit well when applied to the build target. As we
> d
On Sat, May 03, 2025 at 09:11:21PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 4.7.2.0
Dear Pirate,
> Control: block 1104509 by -1
As a general policy, such block is inappropriate. Package are supposed to
comply with policy at the time they are uploaded. They cannot depend o
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 06:04:53PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Regarding the following, written by "Simon McVittie" on 2025-04-23 at 16:46
> Uhr +0100:
> > If the maintainers of kitty don't want to add a -name option, then I
> > think this should be closed as "won't fix". Policy is clear about
On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 03:07:54PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Is there any reasonable situation where modification (during build) of
> ANY existing files under debian/ is a good idea?
>
> I know modifying existing non-debian/ files is common to patch
> source-level problems, but is modifying
On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 01:23:19PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, 2025-03-28 at 13:01:47 +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > * Bill Allombert [250328 10:33]:
> > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 10:02:46AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > > Sourc
On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 10:02:46AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Source: popularity-contest
> Source-Version: 1.78
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi!
>
> Was checking the git repo, and noticed that the package cannot be
> built from a git checkout, as it is at least missing the
> debian-popcon.gpg file.
Package: luanti
Severity: normal
Version: 5.10.0+dfsg-3
Hello Debian game team,
luanti recommends luanti-game-minetest which is not available, not
even in the NEW queue.
Cheers,
--
Bill.
Imagine a large red swirl here.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 03:18:07PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> In that spirit, please find a third one, which fail with both libc,
> but in a different way.
>
> About 10% of the time, it hangs in 'exit' after all threads have terminated.
(This is an aside to this bug re
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 11:29:46PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> control: forwarded -1 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32782
>
> Hi Bill,
> >
> > I join a simplified test-case.
>
> Thanks, I have been able to simplify it a tiny bit more, please find it
> attached. It's the versi
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 12:24:43PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 11:45:10AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > I am still unsure wether there is a race condition in PARI or not, however
> > if
> > there is, it is clear that 2.41 makes the issue m
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 12:24:43PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 11:45:10AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > I am still unsure wether there is a race condition in PARI or not, however
> > if
> > there is, it is clear that 2.41 makes the issue m
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 09:12:15AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 11:49:39PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > I also noticed it failed the same way on arm64.
>
> Thanks for confirming!
>
> > > > Please tell me if you would like me to do mor
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 11:49:39PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I also noticed it failed the same way on arm64.
Thanks for confirming!
> > > Please tell me if you would like me to do more experiments.
> >
> > If you have time, yes, that's very useful. I'll also try to have a
> > closer look at
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 11:45:10AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> I am still unsure wether there is a race condition in PARI or not, however if
> there is, it is clear that 2.41 makes the issue much worse.
Hello Aurélien,
I have made some progress. I have made a test program that does n
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 07:02:25AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> On 2025-03-05 21:30, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Package: libc6
> > Version: 2.41-7
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hello Aurelien,
> >
> > During a test bui
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 03:57:42PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Bill Allombert writes ("Re: Bug#1092193: option (or env) to request
> <=bookworm r-r-r behaviour"):
> > 2/ I consider --rules-requires-root to be a sufficient work-around
> > _provided_ it is clearly
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 02:17:46PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 09:50:35AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 07:02:25AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > Hi Bill,
> > >
> > > On 2025-03-05 21:30, Bill All
On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 12:02:32PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > What is the downside?
>
> It is cost to both dpkg _and_ to the users you are seeking to
> protect, and to everyone else maintaining tools or just reading the
> dpkg documentation in the future.
>
> > Why is anyone even bother
On Sun, Jan 05, 2025 at 10:47:31PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.22.13
> Control: block 1092190 by -1
>
> Hi.
>
> (Firstly, I should say thank you very much to Niels Thykier for your
> work on Rules-Requires-Root. Tidying this up is a big job which
> you've been doing ve
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 07:17:25PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> It's what I was currently doing. I found that the issue is caused by this
> upstream commit:
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=89b53077d2a58f00e7debdfe58afabe953dac60d
>
> This is the corresponding bug that got fi
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 07:02:25AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> On 2025-03-05 21:30, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Package: libc6
> > Version: 2.41-7
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hello Aurelien,
> >
> > During a test bui
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 07:17:25PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2025-03-06 19:03, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > >
> > > Do you have more details about that? I have tried to build pari locally,
> > > and it builds fine. On which architecture is that? In which versi
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 09:50:35AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 07:02:25AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Hi Bill,
> >
> > On 2025-03-05 21:30, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > Package: libc6
> > > Version: 2.41-7
> > &
Package: libc6
Version: 2.41-7
Severity: normal
Hello Aurelien,
During a test build pari FTBFS due to a test-suite failure in a test involving
pthread.
this failure is only reproducible with libc6 2.41.
So I wonder if this is linked to the fix for 986724. pari uses condition
variables.
Of cou
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 04:14:50PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Bill Allombert:
> > [...]
> >
> > Users are using dpkg to build packages that are not part of unstable and
> > testing,
> > and so have not beed considered by the November tests.
> >
> >
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 10:02:25AM +0800, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu 27 Feb 2025 at 06:52am -05, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 7:36 AM Sean Whitton
> > wrote:
> >> Therefore I am seeking seconds for the following patch.
> >
> > Sean, I appreciate the work you do
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 07:57:28PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Bill Allombert:
> > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 08:55:38PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > > Control: severity -1 normal
> > >
> > > When Guillem and I analyzed the numbers in November, we concluded
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 08:55:38PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Control: severity -1 normal
>
> When Guillem and I analyzed the numbers in November, we concluded we could
> remove fakeroot from 10 000 packages while only having to fix about 250
> packages. That is, only 2.5% of the packages would
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 10:18:11AM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-07-14 at 19:59 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 06:29:55PM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> > > > From man:machine-id(5):
> > >
> > > +---
> > > > The machine
On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 08:08:53AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-11-18 at 16:06 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> > But then the user would not be able to configure it anymore,
> > so I do not see the upside.
>
> I just discovered an alternative that preserves th
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 11:14:52AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> Package: popularity-contest
> Version: 1.77
> Severity: normal
>
> × cron-daily-popularity-contest.service - [Cron]
> /etc/cron.daily/popularity-contest
> Loaded: loaded (/etc/cron.daily/popularity-contest; generated)
>
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 11:17:37PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Package: libchart-perl
> Version: 2.403.9-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello Debian Perl Group,
>
> Upgrading popcon.debian.org to bookworm breaks the graphics due to an issue in
> libchart-perl. I join a very
Package: libchart-perl
Version: 2.403.9-1
Severity: normal
Hello Debian Perl Group,
Upgrading popcon.debian.org to bookworm breaks the graphics due to an issue in
libchart-perl. I join a very simple test.
% perl test.pl 50
//OK
% perl test.pl 75
Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /u
On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 12:51:02AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Sun, 2025-02-02 at 23:40:45 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Package: debian-policy
> > Version: 4.7.0.2
> > Severity: normal
> > Tags: patch
>
> > The section 8.4, Development files, mentions that the development
> > pac
On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 11:40:45PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 4.7.0.2
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> Dear Policy maintainers,
>
> The section 8.4, Development files, mentions that the development
> package should contain a symlink for the associated sha
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 09:04:28PM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Jeremy" == Jeremy Bícha writes:
>
> FWIW, I think it is desirable to get as many man pages as we can.
> To that end, I hope policy continues to:
>
> *encourage writing man pages
>
> * Encourage maintainers to take well writte
On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 10:23:01AM -0500, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 5:21 AM Bill Allombert wrote:
> > The man page provides a link between the executable name and the app.
> > This is useful in a lot of situation. Writing such a manpage is not
> > a waste
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 08:16:29PM -0500, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> - Many new contributors to Debian in an attempt to get their new
> package "Lintian clean" spend significant time creating a manpage for
> their app, often a GUI app with no command line options. The manpage
> does not really have usef
On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 07:37:38PM +, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
> Package: menu
> Version: 2.1.50
> Severity: minor
> Tags: patch
>
>* What led up to the situation?
>
> Checking for defects with a new version
>
> test-[g|n]roff -mandoc -t -K utf8 -rF0 -rHY=0 -rCHECKSTYLE=10 -ww -z
Package: wine
Version: 10.0~rc2~repack-2
Severity: normal
Dear Debian Wine party,
I run wine in text mode in a CI cronjob (so XDG_RUNTIME_DIR is not defined).
Since I upgraded wine, it reports a spurious error message:
error: XDG_RUNTIME_DIR is invalid or not set in the environment.
even though I
On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 11:59:31AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Severity: minor
> X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
>
>
> In Policy 4.9, we have this sentence:
> > Except for packages in the non-free archive with the Autobuild control
> > field unset or set to no, require
On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 11:59:31AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Severity: minor
> X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
>
>
> In Policy 4.9, we have this sentence:
> > Except for packages in the non-free archive with the Autobuild control
> > field unset or set to no, require
On Sat, Jan 04, 2025 at 12:54:20PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> * Bill Allombert [250104 12:21]:
> > > > Secondly, I just found a package that fails if /usr/share/doc is
> > > > removed, so I wonder how far we can actually validate this.
> > >
> >
On Sat, Jan 04, 2025 at 10:28:55AM +, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > For /usr/share/doc/$pkg, it is easy to move the files to /usr/share/$pkg.
>
> I don't think that would be a good fix in most cases.
Maybe or maybe not in the majority of case, but at least this is simple enough
to do on the packagi
On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 11:45:49PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2024, Bill Allombert wrote:n
> > Do you have a preference how to fix this bug ?
>
> My personal preference is to fix debbugsconfig to not copy those files
> at all. The example config is needlessly
On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 01:33:58PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > What is a graceful failure for some script is a crash for another...
>
> I would be happy to reduce the expectations of the language here; when I said
> "gracefully" here, the only case I had in mind was "doesn't fail silently"
> (
On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 07:49:24PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Hello Don,
> Do you have a preference how to fix this bug ?
I join a minimal patch that fixes this.
Cheers,
--
Bill.
Imagine a large red swirl here.
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 93ed796..5cb29cf 100644
On Sun, Dec 22, 2024 at 12:43:25AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Package: debbugs
> Version: 2.6.3
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello Don,
>
> debbugsconfig does
> system("cp /usr/share/doc/debbugs/examples/$name $destdir/$name") == 0
>
> However policy pr
Package: debbugs
Version: 2.6.3
Severity: normal
Hello Don,
debbugsconfig is shipped as part of debbugs but requires
/etc/debbugs which is part of debbugs-web
%dpkg-deb -c debbugs_2.6.3_all.deb | grep debbugsconfig
-rwxr-xr-x root/root 4249 2024-11-05 18:00 ./usr/sbin/debbugsconfig
-rw-r--r
On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 06:29:12PM +, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Indeed, this isn't great text both for all the not-intended-to-be-edited
> stuff we have shipped there, plus the /usr-and-overrides thing more
> recently. Thanks for the write-up.
... which by the way is not particularly
On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 08:58:46AM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> Source: menu
> Version: 2.1.49
> Severity: normal
>
> su-to-root has a builtin list of graphical become-root programs.
> It appears most of these programs have ceased to exist.
In Debian, or in general ?
> For kdesu, the
> pro
On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 08:56:43AM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 06:15:16PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 11:21:26PM +, ca...@allfreemail.net wrote:
> > > your package installs the filenames `install-menu` and `su-to-ro
Package: debbugs
Version: 2.6.3
Severity: normal
Hello Don,
debbugsconfig does
system("cp /usr/share/doc/debbugs/examples/$name $destdir/$name") == 0
However policy prohibit packages to depend on the content of
/usr/share/doc/, so the part of /usr/share/doc/debbugs/examples/ used by
debbugsc
On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 03:21:06PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Dec 2024, Bill Allombert wrote:n
> > Package: debbugs
> > Version: 2.6.3
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hello Don,
> >
> > This is from #644242.
> >
> > the file cg
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 11:45:04AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Source: libjpeg6b
> Version: 1:6b2-3.1
>
> As odd as it sounds it seems that libjpeg62 should now provides:
>
> libjpeg62-turbo (>= 1.3.1)
>
> Otherwise it cannot be installed on typical sid system, it would
> remove jre for in
Package: debbugs
Version: 2.6.3
Severity: normal
Hello Don,
This is from #644242.
the file cgi/search.cgi links to http://bugs.debian.org/css/bugs.css instead
of linking to $gWebHostBugDir/css/bugs.css or maybe
/$gWebHostBugDir/css/bugs.css
Cheers,
Bill.
Package: debbugs
Version: 2.6.2
Severity: normal
Hello Don,
This is from #644242:
debbugs-web ships the file
/usr/share/debbugs/templates/en_US/cgi/bugreport.tmpl
which includes the line
Send a report that this bug log contains
spam.
However bugspam.cgi is not provided by the package.
It i
Package: debbugs
Version: 2.6.2
Severity: normal
Hello Don,
This is not a new issue even while I report it now:
spamscan is calling spamscan-sa and this leads to error message from cron:
Timeout::_run: check: no loaded plugin implements 'check_main': cannot scan!
Check that the necessary '.pre' f
On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 06:55:24PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> Package: popularity-contest
> Version: 1.77
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: martin-eric.rac...@iki.fi
>
> popularity-contest still Recommends cron|cron-daemon on Linux ports. It would
> be desirable to migrate the cron job to
On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 10:13:24AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 4.7.0.1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
> X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org
>
> Packages already tend to avoid requiring any files from /usr/share/man
> or /usr/share/info, and don't require fil
Le Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 09:41:16PM +0900, Euiseo Cha a écrit :
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Euiseo Cha
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
>
> * Package name: paperutil
> Version : 1.0.0
> Upstream Contact: Mina Her
> * URL : https://github.
On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 08:52:19AM +0200, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 01, 2024 at 09:44:17PM -0800, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> > > My intent here was to suggest specifically that the version of form
> > > 0.0~git20130606.b00ec39-1 would be elevated as the Policy recommended
> > > form, as
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 10:44:40AM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Otto Kekäläinen writes:
>
> >> The commit hash. 007c9af.
> >
> > OK, thanks.
> >
> > I disagree here - to me the git commit hash is the single most
> > important identifier for the software version if there are no actual
> > relea
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 05:43:04PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 06:31:22PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Replace dh_buildinfo by a script that just print a warning but does not
> > actually
> > generate the file, then ask for binNMU ?
> >
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 05:16:47PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 02:04:03PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > IIRC you said in some other thread that dh-buildinfo is causing you
> > issues. If that is the case (= if I'm not misremembering), an upload
> > that "defuses" dh
Le Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 11:25:44AM +, Holger Levsen a écrit :
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 12:11:23PM +0100, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
> > Don't forget the 311 build-depends ...
> > $ reverse-depends -l -b dh-buildinfo | wc -l
> > 311
>
> so /usr/bin/reverse-depends was the tool I was looking f
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 06:29:25PM +0800, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon 18 Nov 2024 at 11:01pm -08, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
>
> > Package: debian-policy
> > Found: 4.7.0.1
> >
> > Currently
> > https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#source-package-handling-debian-readme-
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 11:01:56PM -0800, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Found: 4.7.0.1
>
> Currently
> https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#source-package-handling-debian-readme-source
> talks about `README.source`.
>
> I suggest we would allow this file to
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 10:00:46AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Package: libdebbugs-perl
> Version: 2.6.0
> Severity: important
>
> While investigating failing autopkgtests in debbugs, I noticed that
> Debbugs::Estraier needs Search::Estraier. This used to be in Debian,
> but was removed
> (https
Le Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 08:12:22PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Control: tags -1 help
> Thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> today molds (from Debichem team) came up as candidate for the Bug of the
> Day[1]. I considered bug #1075979 easy to fix by simply adding
> libopenmpi-dev to Build-Depends since
>
> $
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 10:32:45PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2024, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 11:04:26PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > In any case, please decide either to commit to maintain this package or
> > > to let
On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 01:37:46PM +0100, Antoine Le Gonidec wrote:
> > Before we can report a bug against debianutils, we need to find a way
> > to reproduce the problem easily.
>
> I finally identified how it got triggered here, but this is not a
> lightweight way to reproduce it: by accident, t
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 07:29:55PM +0100, Antoine Le Gonidec wrote:
> > If I understand correctly, the issue is that savelog(8) is not
> > reentrant. So maybe the best fix would be to change savelog (in
> > debianutils.) to be reentrant.
>
> Would it seem sensible to reassign this bug to debianuti
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 02:31:54PM +0100, Antoine Le Gonidec wrote:
> > I realized no other one than me could have realisticaly triggered this
> > bug in reality...
>
> I started getting it on a real system in production a couple days ago,
> and it’s only thanks to this bug report that I finally u
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 11:16:30AM -0300, Bruno Schneider wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 11:40:29 +0200 Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> > This file is the log of the information sent. This serves to protect your
> > privacy : you can check exactly what was sent.
> >
> > T
On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 11:04:26PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 10:56:05AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2024 at 04:08:58PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > On Fri, 20 Sep 2024, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Se
On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 10:44:34PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 04:42:59PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Package: jupyter
> > Version: 5.7.2-4
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hello Debian Python Team,
> >
> > 'man jupyte
Package: jupyter
Version: 5.7.2-4
Severity: normal
Hello Debian Python Team,
'man jupyter' is listing only two subcommands while there are much more
available. Maybe you could use help2man ?
Cheers,
--
Bill.
Imagine a large red swirl here.
On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 02:02:40PM +0200, Michel wrote:
> Package: popularity-contest
> Version: 1.76
> Severity: minor
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> /var/log/popularity-contest contains informations sent and not logs.
> I think it could be moved to /var/lib/popularity-contest
> If it should stay in /
On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 05:25:29PM +0200, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
> > In fact using strace it does not seem even to try running inkscape.
>
> When I run the command "strace fim logo.svg", I do not see a mention to
> inkscape neither. However, the logo.svg file is displayed in the fim window.
>
On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 09:54:27PM +0200, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
> * Bill Allombert [2024-10-08 16:44]:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 03:47:58PM +0200, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
> > > * Rafael Laboissière [2024-10-07 09:05]:
> > >
> > > Attached to t
On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 03:47:58PM +0200, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
> * Rafael Laboissière [2024-10-07 09:05]:
>
> > Control: tags -1 + confirmed upstream
> >
> > * Bill Allombert [2024-10-06 22:52]:
> >
> > > fim does not seem to be able to display
1 - 100 of 3520 matches
Mail list logo
