On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 10:02:25AM +0800, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Thu 27 Feb 2025 at 06:52am -05, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 7:36 AM Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name> 
> > wrote:
> >> Therefore I am seeking seconds for the following patch.
> >
> > Sean, I appreciate the work you do on Debian Policy. I can understand
> > your desire to want to quickly release a hotfix because the effects of
> > 4.7.1 were more disruptive than you intended. In this case, you got 3
> > "seconds" which is great, but I believe there were also multiple
> > people replying here that Policy didn't need to be reverted. So I was
> > surprised to see 4.7.2 announced so quickly but apparently after you
> > had already seen replies against your proposal.
> >
> > Maybe it's not that big of a deal and we can expect a version of the
> > 4.7.1 Policy wording to be restored soon after Trixie is released. And
> > maybe it is appropriate for the Policy Editor to quickly and
> > decisively act since we're late in this release cycle.
> 
> Yes, this is all correct.
> 
> I was exercising my authority as DPL Delegate to go ahead and undo the
> change quickly despite opposition, because I saw the violation of
> procedural norms to be so significant.

You have my full support. Changes that are unintentionnal, inadvertent or
erroneous need to be reverted quickly not to create a precedent, otherwise
this jeopardizes the process.

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <ballo...@debian.org>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 

Reply via email to