Bug#1103957: mbrola-en1: restricted use license, missing source

2025-04-22 Thread Ansgar
software is not allowed. The files also seem to be generated from another source (the "Roger database" mentioned in "the MBROLA en1 encoding of the Roger database") which is missing. This looks non-free to me. Ansgar

Bug#1094969: git linked with OpenSSL

2025-04-14 Thread Ansgar ๐Ÿ™€
2] code at all... As Git doesn't seem any different, I think we should close this bug. If we think the system library exception is not valid, then we probably have to remove lots of software and switch core libraries (e.g., use clang, libc++ instead of gcc). Ansgar [1]: Even ignoring fu

Bug#1100828: debian-archive-keyring: trixie archive signing keys

2025-04-06 Thread Ansgar ๐Ÿ™€
Hi, On Wed, 2025-03-19 at 07:47 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > New archive signing keys are now needed for trixie, ideally before the soft > freeze for trixie's update and then they can also be included in 12.11 > before 13.0. The keys are now published, see [1]. Ansgar

Bug#1072205: prevent re-using package versions for NMUs

2025-04-05 Thread Ansgar ๐Ÿ™€
bash not showing up in any Packages index: that can happen for (at least) two reasons. The snapshot service does not retrieve all Packages files. Or the package could have been superseded by a newer version before it was ever published in a dinstall run. Regards, Ansgar On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 15:26

Bug#1072205: prevent re-using package versions for NMUs

2025-04-03 Thread Ansgar ๐Ÿ™€
Hi, On Thu, 2025-04-03 at 00:25 +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > Quoting Ansgar ๐Ÿ™€ (2025-04-02 21:41:39) > > regarding your analysis: I think you could just scan the .changes files as > > they list all *.deb files uploaded.> Though very old changes only h

Bug#1100828: debian-archive-keyring: trixie archive signing keys

2025-03-19 Thread Ansgar ๐Ÿ™€
'll try to get it done soon. Ansgar

Bug#1084924: Draft Ballot Re: Bug#1084924: The system-log-daemon virtual package

2024-12-15 Thread Ansgar ๐Ÿ™€
rtual > package. How should this dependency look like? If systemd can fulfill the dependency, but cannot use "Provides: system-log-daemon" (see question above), should other packages use "Recommends: systemd | system-log- daemon"? I think it would be helpful to be explicit on these questions. Ansgar

Bug#1084924: The system-log-daemon virtual package

2024-12-11 Thread Ansgar ๐Ÿ™€
Hi, On Wed, 2024-12-11 at 11:19 +, Matthew Vernon wrote: > On 11/12/2024 08:13, Ansgar ๐Ÿ™€ wrote: > > > 2. Drop the "Conflicts: system-log-daemon" from providers of > > system- > > log-daemon > > > (2.) is also technically correct: different implem

Bug#1084924: The system-log-daemon virtual package

2024-12-11 Thread Ansgar ๐Ÿ™€
nce then. (That said, I still think packages shouldn't depend on system facilities like a system log, but leave that to the admin / default setup to allow for flexibility; though technically "Depends/Recommends: system-log-daemon" and "Conflicts: system-log-daemon" are independent.) Ansgar

Bug#1084924: The system-log-daemon virtual package

2024-11-13 Thread Ansgar ๐Ÿ™€
e that a "proper" UNIX-like system always needs a MTA (and a running syslog and a compiler and so on) because that is what some systems looked like in the past... Ansgar

Bug#1084924: The system-log-daemon virtual package

2024-11-07 Thread Ansgar ๐Ÿ™€
s like the wrong shape of solution to me; we've not > previously > assumed this,and I don't think the case for such a policy change has > yet been made. Could I ask why the ctte considers this the wrong solution? As it was suggested previously, I assume it was at least taken into consideration in discussions. Ansgar

Bug#1084924: The system-log-daemon virtual package

2024-10-16 Thread Ansgar ๐Ÿ™€
know. What is the alternative for our users? Ansgar

Bug#1082964: setserial: outdated package description

2024-09-29 Thread Ansgar
is (on x86) probably also something that was only relevant before PCI? Ansgar

Bug#1082643: Bug#1082904: kernel-install.8: Some remarks and editorial changes for this man page

2024-09-28 Thread Ansgar ๐Ÿ™€
bug-filing Ansgar

Bug#1081981: libvirt-daemon-driver-storage: introduces hard dependency on NFS and rpcbind

2024-09-16 Thread Ansgar
remote security holes. I think a hard dependency on such services should be avoided. I'm fairly confident one can use libvirt without NFS. My laptop certainly doesn't use NFS :-) Ansgar -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, '

Bug#1081274: ftp.debian.org: snapper-gui wrongly removed from testing

2024-09-10 Thread Ansgar ๐Ÿ™€
Control: reassign -1 release.debian.org Hi, On Tue, 2024-09-10 at 14:24 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Yesterday, I got a report that snapper-gui is removed from Debian > testing. > > The reason for removal is Debiang bug: 1073699, which is for the > snapper package. > snapper is still in the

Bug#1080041: adduser: take sysusers.d files as input

2024-09-01 Thread Ansgar ๐Ÿ™€
ast[2] and upstream seems dead (last commit two years ago). Probably someone would need to write a proper replacement that doesn't have such issues, but there currently seems nobody who is both interested and capable to implement it (as for similar other cases). Ansgar [1]: https://bugs.debian.org/1055517 [2]: https://bugs.debian.org/992058

Bug#1076656: grub-efi-amd64-bin: depends on grub-efi-amd64-unsigned *and* recommends -signed

2024-07-20 Thread Ansgar
(by default). Does grub-efi-amd64-unsigned enable any functions not offered by grub-efi-amd64-signed? If not, why depend on it at all and not just the signed version? For example for the Linux kernel, Debian also just installs the signed version. Ansgar

Bug#1074568: udisks2: revert to using /run/media again; avoids problems with r/o root filesystem

2024-07-01 Thread Ansgar
`/run/media`? There can still be a compat symlink `/media` โ†’ `/run/media` which should be sufficient for FHS compatibility. As an added bonus, this would automatically clean `/media` of unused mount points upon reboot. (I have no idea if also other packages use `/media` and might need changes.) Ansgar

Bug#1074014: encode mandatory merged-/usr into policy

2024-06-26 Thread Ansgar ๐Ÿ™€
ld make dak reject packages shipping files in /bin, /lib*, /sbin to avoid introducing regressions. I find that reasonable, but others might disagree what ftpmasters can accept/reject (I would guess at least one person would in this case...) Ansgar

Bug#1064938: isospec - maintainer does not access email from ftp-master

2024-05-23 Thread Ansgar ๐Ÿ™€
t operator.) Ansgar On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 20:55 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Hi Bastian, > > The Debichem Group maintains ~ 140 packages with this maintainer > address > at lists.alioth.debian.org. > > Was this any misconfiguration on the debian.org side, > or is/was this an

Bug#1071201: systemd 256~rc2-1

2024-05-15 Thread Ansgar ๐Ÿ™€
emd-modules-load.service This is a separate issue: https://bugs.debian.org/1071182 Ansgar

Bug#1071182: dracut: requires changes for systemd 256; boot fails otherwise

2024-05-15 Thread Ansgar
/dracut-ng/issues/253 2. libkmod.so.2 might need to be installed manually: - https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/32508#issuecomment-2080063182 systemd should get a `Breaks: dracut (<< fixed-version-goes-here)` once a fixed version is uploaded. Ansgar -- System Information: Debian R

Bug#996202: EFI Secure Boot for systemd-boot

2024-05-10 Thread Ansgar ๐Ÿ™€
e are fine with this, I think this should be fine. (And AFAIU this seems to be the case.) Maybe we should use a non-trusted cert for the initial setup and only switch to a proper cert once everything is confirmed to be working as expected? Ansgar

Bug#1068192: debian-policy: extended forbidden network access to contrib and non-free

2024-04-01 Thread Ansgar ๐Ÿ™€
t; restriction to all archives? > > Does the build daemons actually build non-free ? Yes: allowlisted non-free packages get built on buildds. Not allowing network access for contrib and non-free as well seems reasonable to me. Ansgar

Bug#1064951: UDD/upload_history: importer broken by switch to detached PGP signatures

2024-02-28 Thread Ansgar ๐Ÿ™€
and process the inner part in the same way as before. Ansgar

Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-02-13 Thread Ansgar
cases (multi-ABI libraries like libc6 or libraries not affected by the ABI change), but it is not reliable. Do we want this? It must at least be documented, probably inย Debian Policyย and GCC. This was asked on debian-devel@ย multipleย times,ย but there was no answer so far. Ansgar

Bug#1063641: dpkg-buildflags: please document how to enable/disable area features for different areas

2024-02-10 Thread Ansgar
led/disabled at once.) Ansgar

Bug#1063605: debian-policy: mandate use of `dpkg-buildflags` for all software compilation on Debian

2024-02-10 Thread Ansgar
On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 22:01 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 09:16:00PM +0100, Ansgar wrote: > > with the upcoming time_t & friends 64-bit transition, dpkg- > > buildflags > > will be used to configure the ABI in use. > > This decision comes

Bug#1063605: debian-policy: mandate use of `dpkg-buildflags` for all software compilation on Debian

2024-02-09 Thread Ansgar
y be mentioned in user documentation as well.) Currently Debian Policy does not mention dpkg-buildflags at all. Ansgar

Bug#1061335: python3-breezy: ships files in `/build`

2024-01-22 Thread Ansgar
/root 0 2024-01-19 23:12 ./build/reproducible-path/ | drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2024-01-19 23:12 ./build/reproducible-path/breezy-3.3.5/ | drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2024-01-19 23:12 ./build/reproducible-path/breezy-3.3.5/debian/ +--- This is probably not intended. Ansgar

Bug#1058945: python3-secretstorage: please do not depend on dbus package

2024-01-07 Thread Ansgar
Hi, On Sun, 2024-01-07 at 22:15 +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > On Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 07:31:48PM +0100, Ansgar wrote: > > > gnome-keyring | alternatives is in Recommends, not in Depends. > > > > > > The reason for that is because someone may want to use secret

Bug#1058945: python3-secretstorage: please do not depend on dbus package

2024-01-07 Thread Ansgar
On Sun, 2024-01-07 at 18:23 +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 07:50:47PM +0100, Ansgar wrote: > > Now try not to install an init system, dbus, ... in a application > > container wanting to use python3-poetry to install some Python > > application. &g

Bug#1058945: python3-secretstorage: please do not depend on dbus package

2024-01-06 Thread Ansgar
Hi, On Sat, 2024-01-06 at 20:39 +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 08:14:55PM +0100, Ansgar wrote: > > If anything, only applications should require specific interfaces. > > A library like python3-secretstorage cannot know whether its use is > > essentia

Bug#1060034: ITP: python-openai -- OpenAI Python API library

2024-01-05 Thread Ansgar
On Fri, 2024-01-05 at 08:50 -0500, Mo Zhou wrote: > > On 1/5/24 03:48, Ansgar wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-01-04 at 21:30 -0500, Mo Zhou wrote: > > > Dependency of DebGPT. Will be maintained by deep learning team. > > > It will go to the contrib section based on polic

Bug#1060034: ITP: python-openai -- OpenAI Python API library

2024-01-05 Thread Ansgar
openai-thing" package to the general public? Ansgar

Bug#1059745: ITP: cryptsetup-2fa -- 2FA plugin for cryptsetup

2023-12-31 Thread Ansgar
iew is requested here, too. Is there any reason to not just use systemd-cryptenroll? It seems to be a more featureful implementation and also doesn't require storing PINs in plain text in configuration files like /etc/cryptsetup/2fa/2fa.conf as README instructs users to do here. Nor does it st

Bug#1059654: tablix2: please build without PVM support; blocks removal of PVM

2023-12-29 Thread Ansgar
Source: tablix2 Version: 0.3.5-7 Severity: important Control: block 1055957 by -1 Please build tablix2 without PVM support. PVM is no longer maintained, seems irrelevant for parallel applications these days and has been proposed to be removed (#1055957). Ansgar

Bug#1059653: netpipe: stop building netpipe-pvm; blocks removal of pvm

2023-12-29 Thread Ansgar
Source: netpipe Version: 3.7.2-8 Severity: important Control: block 1055957 by -1 Please stop building netpipe-pvm, it blocks removal of PVM (#1055957). I don't think PVM is still relevant for parallel applications these days. Ansgar

Bug#1059652: Proposed-RM: slpvm -- RoQA; PVM no longer maintained

2023-12-29 Thread Ansgar
tions, I'll reassign this bug to the FTP team. I'll wait at least two weeks, i.e., at least until 2024-01-13; though it might take longer until I look at this again. Ansgar

Bug#1059644: inetutils: provide rsh-client & rsh-server?

2023-12-29 Thread Ansgar
t;. I wonder if it really needs rsh-client or whether that dependency could just be dropped? Ansgar

Bug#1058945: python3-secretstorage: please do not depend on dbus package

2023-12-18 Thread Ansgar
A library like python3-secretstorage cannot know whether its use is essential (in which case dbus should probably be a dependency) or totally optional (in which case dbus should be suggested/recommended). Ansgar

Bug#1057000: Broken OPENSSL_init_ssl

2023-11-27 Thread Ansgar
o Devuan's bug tracker. Debian cannot do technical support for derivative distributions. Ansgar

Bug#1055777: opensysusers: `--replace` does not match systemd-sysusers

2023-11-11 Thread Ansgar
one or more positional arguments must be | specified. All configuration files found in the directories listed | in sysusers.d(5) will be read, and the configuration given on the | command line will be handled instead of and with the same priority | as the configuration file PATH. +---[ man:systemd-sysusers(8) ] Ansgar

Bug#1055517: opensysusers: modifies host system instead of target environment

2023-11-07 Thread Ansgar
e. AFAIR there are other incompatibilities with systemd-sysusers so that opensysusers should arguably not claim to be a compatible drop-in replacement. Ansgar

Bug#1055459: reportbug: ask user if bug is reported from affected system

2023-11-06 Thread Ansgar
eport scripts might not be helpful or even totally misleading. It would be nice if reportbug would ask users if they are reporting the bug from the affected system and (a) omit system information if not or (b) at least indicate the user's answer. Ansgar

Bug#1055429: bind9: iproute2 change ripples through bind9 sysvinit script preventing start

2023-11-06 Thread Ansgar
> Debian Release: trixie/sid >ย ย  APT prefers unstable >ย ย  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) You said elsewhere that this was a bug coming from using a different distribution. Please talk to them so they make sure the system information says so when people are using it. Ansgar

Bug#1051371: Post-/usr-merge paths for script interpreters

2023-09-17 Thread Ansgar
these exist. They are also used, both by software shipping in Debian and outside. Dropping them would break existing software. I'm assuming the Jackson symlink proposal would retain them for this reason instead of breaking software for no good reason. Ansgar

Bug#1050001: Bug#1051371: Post-/usr-merge paths for script interpreters

2023-09-16 Thread Ansgar
Hi, On Sat, 2023-09-16 at 12:58 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Control: unblock 1051371 by 1050001 > > Ansgar writes: > > > However, there is a proposal by Jackson for an alternative filesystem > > layout based on symlink farms in consideration by the technical > &

Bug#1050001: Bug#1051371: Post-/usr-merge paths for script interpreters

2023-09-12 Thread Ansgar
y be aware of this policy issue in their consideration of #1050001; the resolution of which might also cover this issue (#1051371). Ansgar [1]: https://bugs.debian.org/1050001#33

Bug#1051673: deal.ii: uploader email address maybe invalid (Matthias Maier)

2023-09-11 Thread Ansgar
a. I don't understand what the problem here should be? The mail address should be valid. Ansgar

Bug#1051371: debian-policy: stop referring to legacy filesystem paths for script interpreters

2023-09-07 Thread Ansgar
rs to patch this in software packaged for Debian? Why? I think it is fine to wait with this until buildds use merged-/usr for builds, but I don't see any reason to spend resources on this after that. Ansgar

Bug#1050001: Third-party tooling support for merged-/usr vs symlink farms

2023-09-01 Thread Ansgar
t on a production system)? It might be interesting to experiment with the new layout. Ansgar

Bug#1050001: Practical problems with proposed symlink farming: diversions

2023-09-01 Thread Ansgar
y thoughts about this? Ansgar ย  [1]: With some exceptions such as some programs have compat symlinks in the legacy layout or between .../bin and .../sbin.

Bug#1050001: Unwinding directory aliasing [and 3 more messages] [and 1 more messages]

2023-09-01 Thread Ansgar
gt; I think it's worth pointing out that any software which is trying to > be portable to Unix systems other than just Linux (which includes the > BSDs and MacOS) will need to avoid assuming directory aliasing. Which seems irrelevant for what we do in Debian. On portable system you can't assume `/bin/sh` to be there either... Ansgar

Bug#1050001: Unwinding directory aliasing [and 3 more messages]

2023-08-27 Thread Ansgar
actice it seems to work fine, and of course avoiding stuff associated with a certain company which I understand is a goal in itself for some people)... I would appreciate a list of technical and ideological reasons why switching to the Jackson layout is important for Debian. Ansgar

Bug#1043114: Please remove mipsel port from testing and sid

2023-08-26 Thread Ansgar
Please stop building packages for mipsel for unstable/experimental so we can proceed here. Ansgar

Bug#1050001: enabling telemetry to track usage of /bin compat shims?

2023-08-24 Thread Ansgar
On Wed, 2023-08-23 at 20:50 +0200, Ansgar wrote: > > /bin and /lib etc. remain directories (so there is no aliasing).ย  All > > actual files are shipped in /usr.ย  / contains compatibility symlinks > > pointing into /usr, for those files/APIs/programs where this is > > neede

Bug#1050001: Unwinding directory aliasing

2023-08-24 Thread Ansgar
n before coming to the tech- ctte as far as I know. If someone wants to go this way, I suggest to just have a GR about it instead of iterating this at tech-ctte yet again. It's not very motivating to have some people endlessly argue against moving forward and wanting to revisit/reverse/change some decisions endlessly. Ansgar

Bug#1050001: Unwinding directory aliasing

2023-08-24 Thread Ansgar
ns, we can talk about init system support in Debian and costs/benefits of supporting some of them. :-) Ansgar

Bug#1050001: Unwinding directory aliasing

2023-08-23 Thread Ansgar
e in /bin) will not give any bugs? We already *had* these bugs for several releases and found them only after release (even before usrmerge which makes them non-bugs). Please provide a plan how to fix these ahead of time; please be aware that they might only occur with some hardware / configurations. Ansgar

Bug#1049969: cron-daemon-common: the /etc/cron.hourly line in /etc/crontab is broken

2023-08-20 Thread Ansgar
Frankendebian"). If something then breaks, you get to fix it yourself; don't expect others to support such a setup. Ansgar

Bug#1049969: cron-daemon-common: the /etc/cron.hourly line in /etc/crontab is broken

2023-08-18 Thread Ansgar
On Fri, 2023-08-18 at 22:45 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2023-08-18 07:35:33 +0200, Ansgar wrote: > > Please investigate why "usrmerge" is not installed (I assume this is an > > upgraded system).ย  Or, if it is installed, why /bin, /sbin, /lib* are > > n

Bug#1049969: cron-daemon-common: the /etc/cron.hourly line in /etc/crontab is broken

2023-08-17 Thread Ansgar
in *must* be a symlink to /usr/bin, so /usr/bin/run-parts must exist and cron's PATH is sufficient. Please investigate why "usrmerge" is not installed (I assume this is an upgraded system). Or, if it is installed, why /bin, /sbin, /lib* are not symlinks to their respective counterparts in /usr. Ansgar

Bug#1049462: dpkg-source: Ignore __pycache__ by default (was: Re: __pycache__ directories)

2023-08-16 Thread Ansgar
should just be extended to include "__pycache__" as well and these would be non-issues. Ansgar

Bug#1041207: debootstrap: bad NMU produces buildds not supported by dpkg _and_ CTTE

2023-07-16 Thread Ansgar
y go ahead as planned, i.e., social costs are not considered, but should be (IMHO). Ansgar

Bug#1039102: debian-policy: make systemd units mandatory for packages shipping system services

2023-06-25 Thread Ansgar
e changed. So please consider reverting +--- | Packages that include system services must include ``systemd`` service +--- to the original +--- | Packages that include system services should include ``systemd`` service +--- Ansgar

Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var

2023-06-25 Thread Ansgar
ration". This should address concerns raise on d-devel@ that some packages might not ship an init script. It also better covers alternative init systems that do something more interesting than just starting the same sysvinit scripts of old (not sure if any do). Ansgar

Bug#1038886: /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/udev fails in chroot

2023-06-22 Thread Ansgar
irectory What is the output of ls -ld /bin /bin/udevadm /usr/bin/udevadm ? How did you create the chroot? Ansgar

Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var

2023-06-13 Thread Ansgar
in two places would at least be confusing for users: where would users need to change settings? In the unit file? In the tmpfiles files? Both? Ansgar

Bug#1035904: dpkg currently warning about merged-usr systems (revisited)

2023-06-13 Thread Ansgar
added a small warning to the FAQ: https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Dpkg/FAQ?action=diff&rev1=78&rev2=79 Ansgar

Bug#1035904: dpkg currently warning about merged-usr systems (revisited)

2023-06-13 Thread Ansgar
ppointed how the ctte appears to do as much as they can to avoid deciding on this :-( Ansgar

Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var

2023-06-13 Thread Ansgar
I suggest that you try systemd-nspawn for this purpose. > Or podman or docker or various other things. Plain chroots and an unclean environment which violates various assumptions system startup scripts make are not a great way to test stuff. Ansgar

Bug#820423: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal

2023-06-09 Thread Ansgar
y is available from https://defi.43-1.org/defibrillator-test-key.asc Ansgar

Bug#1035904: dpkg currently warning about merged-usr systems (revisited)

2023-06-06 Thread Ansgar
eb.debian.org and so on, I think the Debian project *is* the upstream for dpkg. Ansgar

Bug#1035904: dpkg currently warning about merged-usr systems (revisited) (was: Re: DEP 17: Improve support for directory aliasing in dpkg)

2023-05-21 Thread Ansgar
Yes, I do. Please pass a resolution that you don't want to override the dpkg maintainer and that telling derivative users to configure their system in a way that will cause breakage is okay to do for packages in Debian. Ansgar

Bug#1036358: release-notes: Debian 12 expected to be last release w/ installer for i386

2023-05-19 Thread Ansgar
i386 and no longer provide installation media for i386. | | We recommend hosts still running the i386 port to be upgraded | to amd64. Legacy i386 software can be run using multi-arch, | chroot environments or containers. +--- Ansgar

Bug#1035904: dpkg currently warning about merged-usr systems (revisited)

2023-05-19 Thread Ansgar
Hi, On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 07:09 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > On Thu 18 May 2023 at 07:55PM +02, Ansgar wrote: > > > Why not? > > We will not move that fast. So there is no real reason? As there doesn't seem to be anything you think need to be talked about that is missi

Bug#1035904: dpkg currently warning about merged-usr systems (revisited)

2023-05-18 Thread Ansgar
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 12:14 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Ansgar dijo [Thu, May 18, 2023 at 07:55:03PM +0200]: > > Why not? > > > > Do you think the implications of removing the warning are unclear? > > > > Do you think we need to explore alternative solutions?

Bug#1035904: dpkg currently warning about merged-usr systems (revisited)

2023-05-18 Thread Ansgar
Hi, On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 10:48 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > On Thu 18 May 2023 at 07:21PM +02, Ansgar wrote: > > > The full freeze is approaching and there has been no progress on > > this > > issue. Does the ctte think a decision before the release is still > > p

Bug#1035904: dpkg currently warning about merged-usr systems (revisited) (was: Re: DEP 17: Improve support for directory aliasing in dpkg)

2023-05-18 Thread Ansgar
Hi, On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 00:32 +0200, Ansgar wrote: > On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 23:47 +0200, Ansgar wrote: > > Cool, then let's ask tech-ctte. > > > > Dear ctte, please consider overruling the dpkg maintainer to > > include > > the patch from #994388[1]. >

Bug#1035904: dpkg currently warning about merged-usr systems (revisited)

2023-05-11 Thread Ansgar
On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 19:01 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > On Wed 10 May 2023 at 11:47PM +02, Ansgar wrote: > > Cool, then let's ask tech-ctte. > > > > Dear ctte, please consider overruling the dpkg maintainer to > > include > > the patch from #994388[1]. >

Bug#1035904: dpkg currently warning about merged-usr systems (revisited) (was: Re: DEP 17: Improve support for directory aliasing in dpkg)

2023-05-10 Thread Ansgar
On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 23:47 +0200, Ansgar wrote: > Cool, then let's ask tech-ctte. > > Dear ctte, please consider overruling the dpkg maintainer to include > the patch from #994388[1]. > > Thanks, > Ansgar > > ย  [1]: https://bugs.debian.org/994388#397 For deriv

Bug#1035904: dpkg currently warning about merged-usr systems (revisited) (was: Re: DEP 17: Improve support for directory aliasing in dpkg)

2023-05-10 Thread Ansgar
Package: tech-ctte X-Debbugs-Cc: Russ Allbery , Sean Whitton , Helmut Grohne , Luca Boccassi , debian-d...@lists.debian.org, debian-de...@lists.debian.org On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 14:36 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Ansgar writes: > > Debian going out of its way to tell derivative users

Bug#830857: [Pkg-libvirt-maintainers] Bug#830857: libvirt-daemon: CPU feature cmt not found

2023-05-07 Thread Ansgar Hegerfeld
Hi, since I'm not using this Debian/libvirt version anymore, I think the issue can be closed/marked as resolved. Thanks, Ansgar On Thu, 2023-04-27 at 17:26 +0200, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 08:22:31PM +0200, Ansgar Hegerfeld wrote: > > Okay

Bug#1029214: debian-archive-keyring: bookworm archive signing keys

2023-03-08 Thread Ansgar
Adam D. Barratt wrote: > We need new archive signing keys for bookworm, so that we can include > them in the release. The keys are published now, see https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/03/msg1.html Ansgar

Bug#1031389: gdm3: installing fprintd, but not libpam-fprintd makes login via gdm impossible

2023-02-16 Thread Ansgar
ssword login as a fallback, but only when libpam-fprintd is installed. Otherwise login fails before a password prompt is shown. Ansgar

Bug#1031389: gdm3: installing fprintd, but not libpam-fprintd makes login via gdm impossible

2023-02-16 Thread Ansgar
That might also be a minor bug. Ansgar -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (300, 'buildd-unstable'), (300, 'unstable'), (1, 'buildd-experimental'), (1, 'experimental') Architect

Bug#801065: Documenting how to not fail postinst on service fails to start

2023-02-12 Thread Ansgar
ot; too if the automation means debconf as the admin might not have answered to the questions, for example when the package is installed in an automated setup ;-) Ansgar

Bug#1030668: dinstall could run more often (every hour?)

2023-02-06 Thread Ansgar
explain what issues you have that are not solved by using incoming.d.o. Ansgar

Bug#1030189: Let regular users know need to put non-free-firmware in sources.list

2023-02-01 Thread Ansgar
less they use a VM. Ansgar

Bug#1029214: debian-archive-keyring: bookworm archive signing keys

2023-01-30 Thread Ansgar
y have received the recovery share. Or that the share was lost on the way. I'm not sure how long it will take. Ansgar

Bug#1029831: debian-policy: Make required packages build-essential

2023-01-29 Thread Ansgar
hat is a change from current practice. And could be extended to forcing /usr/local to be empty and a sane, standard environment and contents of $HOME and anything else that could affect build results. Ansgar

Bug#1029831: debian-policy: Make required packages build-essential

2023-01-28 Thread Ansgar
ity "required" and additional packages. An informational | list of additional packages can be found in | /usr/share/doc/build-essential/list (which is contained in the | build-essential package). +--- This only documents existing practice as practically all systems have required packages installed. Ansgar

Bug#1029518: git: "git bundle create" results in segfault

2023-01-23 Thread Ansgar
arguments, but I expected an error message telling me what the other arguments are and in which order "git bundle create" expects them. Ansgar -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (300, 'buildd-unstable

Bug#1028961: dpkg: reverts to using insecure cryptographic algorithms by default

2023-01-15 Thread Ansgar
ty issue (just like, for example, reverting to using SSL3 instead of TLS1.3). Ansgar -- Package-specific info: This system uses merged-usr-via-aliased-dirs, going behind dpkg's back, breaking its core assumptions. This can cause silent file overwrites and disappearances, and its general too

Bug#1028523: dpkg-dev: No obvious way to include upstream signature in dpkg-genchanges

2023-01-15 Thread Ansgar
intainer is unhappy with the project decision and included this warning which sadly unsettles users. Ansgar

Bug#1008281: setting sysctl net.ipv4.ping_group_range

2023-01-08 Thread Ansgar
rnels (which can come from upstream) ;-) If you want some other "common" ground, I guess it would need to be created and adopted instead of the current one first. Ansgar

Bug#1026017: ITP: designate-tlds -- Designate TLDs population

2022-12-13 Thread Ansgar
ould explicitly state that "TLDs" is an abbrevation for "public suffix list" here as that is not a common use of that three letter acronym ;-) At least at a quick glance it doesn't seem to filter the list to only include top-level domains also listed on the public suffix list (I'm not sure all top-level domains are there?) Ansgar

Bug#1025502: dak: `dak rm -b ${package}` does not work if source of ${package} already gone

2022-12-05 Thread Ansgar
e AND su.id = newest_source.suite +---[ dak/rm.py ] which then results in an empty set if `${package}`'s source is no longer in the suite. Ansgar

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >