On 1/9/25 8:34 AM, wuruilong wrote:
It has been a long time since the code was merged. When will the new software
package be uploaded?
At the next upstream release, an upload to fix an RC bug, or shortly before the
soft freeze, whichever comes first.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R
On 09/01/25 at 08:39 +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Dear Lucas,
>
> Le 08/01/2025 à 20:37, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> > on amd64.
> > [...]
> > > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > > libdscheck-ocaml-dev
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Lucas,
Thanks for this. However, I am a bit confused: the error in the subject doesn't
appear in the body of the report. It _is_ present in the full log, but in
relation to test
== 182/187 ===
test:
Dear Lucas,
Le 08/01/2025 à 20:37, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
[...]
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libdscheck-ocaml-dev : Depends: libcontainers-ocaml-dev-5iq37 but it is not
installable
This is
On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 08:27:13AM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> lib32atomic1 and libn32atomic1 have an undeclared cross-architecture
> file conflict on /usr/lib32/libatomic.so.1 and
> /usr/lib32/libatomic.so.1.2.0. This applies to bullseye, bookworm,
> trixie and sid. I am not aware of any use cas
Hi,
It has been a long time since the code was merged. When will the new
software package be uploaded?
wuruilong
On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 05:15:29 +0200 Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 8/6/24 3:39 AM, wuruilong wrote:
> > Now, gmt still compiles incorrectly on loongarch, and the debian
reposito
Hi Aurelien,
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 07:57:42PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I can confirm that. That said I am a bit surprised that you only mention
> these two. For instance libc6-dev-s390 and libc6-dev-i386 also both
> conflict with libc6-dev-mipsn32.
I had problems importing mips64el as boo
Source: statsprocessor
Version: 0.11+git20160316-4
Tags: patch
User: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftcbfs
statsprocessor is one of those rare packages that have a native build
pass. When adding it the compiler flags were pretty uniform across
architectures now with PAC/BTI they tend to d
Package: lib32atomic1,libn32atomic1
Version: 10.2.1-6
Severity: important
Justification: undeclared cross-architecture file conflict
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fileconflict
lib32atomic1 and libn32atomic1 have an undeclared cross-architecture
file conflict on /usr/lib32/libatomic.so
5): undefined reference to `uv_utf16_to_wtf8'
88s collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
88s File "caml_startup", line 1:
88s Error: Error during linking (exit code 1)
89s autopkgtest [22:35:23]: summary
89s helloworld FAIL non-zero exit status
Package: plasma-mobile
Version: 6.2.4-1
Severity: normal
I get the following error from "apt dist-upgrade", it needs to conflict
with the old version of plasma-settings as there is a file conflict.
Unpacking plasma-mobile (6.2.4-1) over (5.27.10-1+b1) ...
dpkg: error processing archive
/var/cach
Package: octave-zmat
Severity: normal
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the
past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: antonio.valent...@tiscali.it
Dear Maintainer,
recently c-blosc2 started having problems to build on the mips64el
architecture.
The problem is not really clear and
Source: puppetserver
Version: 8.7.0-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I've just uploaded ruby-concurrent 1.3.4 to experimental, to prepare the
transition beyond Ruby Rails 6 in Debian.
puppetserver currently locks the ruby-concurrent version at 1.2.3. Would
it be possible to relax the versi
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 16:29:06 +0100 Flachy Joe wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> how to use this patch on debian ?
>
>
> Regards,
> Florian FW
>
>
>
Put patch to debian/module/debian/patches/ in package source.
Add its name to series file and rebuild the package.
Best regards,
Andrey
Control: retitle -1 Qt WebEngine crashes when reading libwidevinecdm.so
Control: reassign -1 src:qt6-webengine
Control: affects -1 k3b
Koutheir,
On Wednesday, January 8, 2025 6:02:36 PM MST Koutheir Attouchi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> *> Could you try launching other apps that build against the Qt6 WebEng
Package: tdom
Version: 0.9.5-1.1
Tags: ftbfs
Usertags: hppa powerpc
Testcase fails like this:
Result was:
1 {error "not well-formed (invalid token)" at line 14048575688 character
50379238646}
Result should have been (exact matching):
1 {error "not well-formed (invalid token)" at line 3
Package: sioyek
Version: 2.0.0+dfsg-4
Hello!
I am one of the maintainers of MUPDF. I noticed that the package Sioyek has
libmupdf-dev among its build depends. I wanted to let you know that we are
planning to upload the version of MUPDF currently in experimental to
unstable, most likely this weeke
Package: haskell-pandoc
Version: 3.1.11.1-3
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-loonga...@lists.debian.org
User: debian-loonga...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: loong64
block: 1059246 by -1
The version of the package currently FTBFS on the loong64 port:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?
Package: apt
Version: 2.9.21
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-l10n-portugu...@lists.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
Please find attached the Brazilian Portuguese translation for the apt
package. It is UTF-8 encoded, tested with msgfmt. It is a major update
for the last version (2.9.21).
Kind
so i also tested to include poppler2 manually in an html file in addition to
bootstrap.js (without bundle) and then the dropdown works.
So the bundle is apparently broken because popper isnt really bundled, but to
fix it, popper2, not 1 needs to be included. Either in the package or by
adding
confirming this for unstable and backports 5.3.3 versions and also the
bookworm 5.2.3 version.
I also tested if the behaviour matches the upstream binary, e.g. from
https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/bootstrap@5.3.3/dist/js/bootstrap.bundle.min.js
and with the upstream version there is no problem to g
Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.com/sequoia-pgp/sequoia-sq/-/issues/517
Hi!
On Wed, 2025-01-08 at 08:28:49 +0100, Aurélien COUDERC wrote:
> Package: sq
> Version: 0.40.0-1+b1
> Severity: important
> running dpkg-buildpackage -S -d on the breeze source today gives me the
> following :
>
>
Package: unicode
Version: 3.1-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
After installing the python3.13 package today (replacing python3.12),
I'm no longer able to get useful output from the 'unicode' utility:
$ /bin/unicode a
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/bin/u
Thank you, Matthias!
On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 at 00:24, Debian Bug Tracking System
wrote:
>
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the binutils-doc package:
>
> #1090395: binutils-doc: examples.tar.gz archive metadata includes build user
> uid
>
> It ha
Hi,
*> Could you try launching other apps that build against the Qt6 WebEngine
widgets library and report back if you get crashes or not ? Running "apt
rdepends libqt6webenginewidgets6" will give you some ideas (parley,
ktorrent…).*
I tested a few packages reported by "*apt rdepends libqt6webengi
Writing with my apologies as the author/originator of this bug in the
upstream codebase (it is a side-effect of a copyright-related
changeset[1]).
I seemingly-independently wrote a patch today to resolve the cause
that I've opened as a pull request[2] upstream -- but I have to admit
that I _did_ r
Version: 2.6.9+dfsg-1~exp2
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 10:45:40PM +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
I guess switching openldap to openssl is too late before Trixie,
especially since it may as well affect other openldap reverse
dependencies that use GnuTLS.
As it happens, the switch to openssl h
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: lightdm-remote-session-freer...@packages.debian.org
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
Control: affects -1 src:lightdm-remote-session-freerdp2
Please remove lightdm-remote-session-freerdp2 . It is blocking the
removal of
On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 9:51 AM Svante Signell wrote:
> Attached are seven patches enabling a successful build:
> One is Debian-specific and six relates to meson.build files.
Would you be willing to convert your upstream changes into a git merge
request and submit it upstream at
https://gitlab.gno
* Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues [250109 00:14]:
> Quoting Chris Hofstaedtler (2025-01-08 23:16:22)
> > dpkg-deb: warning: root directory
> > /build/reproducible-path/resolver-3qvKDR/sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy
> > has unusual owner or group 998:999
> > dpkg-deb: Hint: you might need to pa
Note that upstream removed the original 2.31.1 tag from git due to the
unintended change to the library version. They have now made a new
2.31.1 tag on a later commit with a fix for this. Please update the
package source,
Mattias
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message pa
Control: fixed 1091147 2.10.10+dfsg-1
Control: fixed 1091147 2.12.0+dfsg-1
On 2024-12-22, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> -MT /<>/build/g12a/debug/libc/setjmp.o -MP -c
>> lib/libc/aarch64/setjmp.S -o /<>/build/g12a/debug/libc/setjmp.o
>> lib/libc/aarch64/setjmp.S: Assembler messages:
>> lib/libc/aarch64
Samuel,
I'm explicitly copying you since I don't know if you were subscribed
to bug reports for this package.
Please remove medusa's Build-Depends: freerdp2-dev since we would like
to remove freerdp2 from Debian before Trixie's release. The
replacement is freerdp3 but medusa would require code ch
On 08/01/2025 22:03, Bastian Germann wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 10:20:39 +0100 Jakub Wilk wrote:
There's no such package in Debian.
I see it is in NEW. Can we please stop adding more GTK2 packages?
___
Pkg-pascal-devel mailing list
pkg-pascal-de...@al
Control: reopen -1
Please also remove the Build-Depends: libwinpr2-dev from krdp as that
package is also built by the freerdp2 source package.
krdp already has Build-Depends: freerdp3-dev which depends on the
correct version of libwinpr's -dev package.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha
Source: krdp
Version: 6.2.5-1
Please update the Vcs fields in debian/control to point to
https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/kde/krdp/
Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha
On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 13:19:50 +0200 Daniele Napolitano
wrote:
Sadly I'm still the maintainer (and upstream) of this package but currently
I don't have access to the computer with all packaging stuff and, more
important, my GPG key to upload the package.
I think It's better to find another maintai
Control: tag -1 pending
On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 08:52:45PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>Source: shim-helpers-amd64-signed
>Version: 1+15.8+1
>Severity: serious
>Justification: FTBFS
>Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
>User: lu...@debian.org
>Usertags: ftbfs-20250106 ftbfs-trixie
>
>Hi,
>
>During a rebuild o
Hi,
Quoting Chris Hofstaedtler (2025-01-08 23:16:22)
> In unstable with the new dpkg, dpkg-deb prints warnings about the
> sbuild dummy package. See below:
>
> dpkg-deb: warning: root directory
> /build/reproducible-path/resolver-3qvKDR/sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy has
> unusual owner or gro
On 1/8/25 13:15, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 02:41:44PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
The request to configure with ICU support stems from
https://bugs.debian.org/776254, issues with chromium.
That bug report is from 2015, so maybe worth re-evaluating.
Let me CC Andres rather
I didn't really follow the automatic bug closing rationale (much to
learn about BTS...) but anyway it looks like this might be an incomplete
fix here in the bin path test that only affects some architectures -
it's the zcfan binary not being located:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/runit-services/
I can do that.
As Simon said when we requested Salsa admin to move 40+ orphaned games from
debian/ dir to games/: our games need human Uploaders, so Patrice would
need to adopt the game (ie: add himself as Uploader)
Greetings and thanks for the heads up
Le mer. 8 janv. 2025, 23:01, Santiago Vila
Source: medusa
Severity: serious
Version: 2.3~rc1-1
User: debian-rem...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: freerdp2
The Debian Remote team is working to remove freerdp2 from inclusion in
Debian 13. Please remove the newly added Build-Depends: freerdp2-dev.
Package: libgvc6
Version: 2.42.4-2+b2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: gre...@gmx.de
Dear Maintainer,
did a normal update with
apt update
apt-full-upgrade
during the update the error message
libgvc6-config-update: symbol lookup error: libgvc6-config-upgrade: undefined
symbol: MemTest
Error: Sub-pr
Hi Paul,
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 08:49:27PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
> template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
> process.
Isn't this bug a duplicate of #1090770 (runit: depends on unsatisfiable
On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 10:48 AM Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> Could you look into either switching cjs to mozjs128 or fixing the
> mozjs115 build failure from https://bugs.debian.org/1084631 ?
I applied the fix from mozjs128 which enables mozjs115 to build successfully.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha
Package: sbuild
Version: 0.88.1
Severity: minor
In unstable with the new dpkg, dpkg-deb prints warnings about the
sbuild dummy package. See below:
Merged Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13), imagemagick, cmake, bison, flex,
libsdl2-dev, libogg-dev, libvorbis-dev, zlib1g-dev, build-essential,
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 10:20:39 +0100 Jakub Wilk wrote:
There's no such package in Debian.
I see it is in NEW. Can we please stop adding more GTK2 packages?
If you can fix that I will gladly upload a fixed package
(with credit to you, of course).
Hmm, I see you are a member of Debian Games. A better
idea would be to ask someone else in the team to
be your sponsor.
(Cc:ing Alexandre in case he wants to care about this,
since he also uploaded pentobi
Good job!
I tried comparing the contents of the old and the new package,
and found several differences due to the move from /usr/lib to
/usr/share (which is of course ok as mandated by FHS).
Then I tried to put things back in /usr/lib, to see the
differences more clearly, and found this:
Files
Control: affects 976991 src:freeradius
Am 08.01.25 um 13:04 schrieb ATIC Sistemas Rede:
Hi,
We've tested with freeradius 3.2.6 in preproduction enviroment.
We've installed these packages from bookworm-backports target release (*).
In debug mode (freeradius -X) we could see several warnings lik
Package: libcryptx-perl
Version: 0.077-1+b1
libperl-cryptx contains and builds a copy of libtomcrypt and libtommath
(Samba is in a similar boat, for libtommath via Heimdal, also
embedded).
Sadly per
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.crypt/c/Z7lVGM2wo2o/m/UfQpm0cdQRMJ from
https://github.com/libtom
I tried to contact the current package maintainer in December, but did not get any reply (seems to be inactive in general for 1+ year).
Raised another bug report via the "reportbug" utility, marking it as orphaned in the WNPP repo... maybe this leads to a more up to date version, which helps other
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Arthur Diniz
* Package name: golang-k8s-component-base
Version : 0.31.4
Upstream Author : Kubernetes
* URL : https://github.com/kubernetes/component-base
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Go
Description : T
Package: xscavenger
Version: 1.4.5-8
Followup-For: Bug #1092434
Control: tags -1 patch ftbfs
Dear Maintainer,
Here is a patch that could help to solve this issue.
It may be not perfect but at least try to simplify the packaging
and be able to build the package (using sbuild on my system).
Thanks
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 12:32:30AM +0300, Serkan wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 6.1.119-1
> Severity: important
> File: nouveau
> X-Debbugs-Cc: sse...@gmail.com
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> When I run Blender, the following records appear in the output of the dmesg
> command;
>
> [
Debian 12.8
kea-common 2.2.0-6
kea-dhcp4-server 2.2.0-6
sysvinit-core 3.06-4
My config file tests without error, but I get the same errors as OP when
trying to run kea-dhcp4-server as user _kea. I am able to test fixes on
sysv.
_kea@cid2004-dhcp-01:/etc/kea$ kea-dhcp4 -t kea-dhcp4.conf
2025-0
Hello Neal,
On Wed, Jan 01, 2025 at 11:18:37PM -0500, Neal Murphy wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 6.1.119-1
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I plugged in my SSK NVME-to-USB3 adapter. I mounted it, checked it (without
> writing anything
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: duperem...@packages.debian.org, potatojugg...@gmx.net
Control: affects -1 + src:duperemove
The current version of the package in debian repositories is terribly outdated
(0.11.2 from November 2020), and a newer version of it is available on GitHub
sin
Package: python3-glue
Version: 1.17.1+dfsg-2
Severity: normal
As Stuart Prescott noted in #1089953, python3-glue imports (from) qtpy
at various places in the code, but does not declare Depends: python3-qtpy
This should probably be fixed.
Best wishes,
Julian
This:
> > WARNING: I tried to get the version of spades with: "/usr/bin/spades.py
> > --version" and the output didn't match this regular expression:
> > "SPAdes.*v([0-9\.]+)"
> > ARIBA version: local
> >
> > External dependencies:
> > bowtie2 2.5.4 /usr/bin/bowtie2
> > cdhit 4.8.1
Upstream would like to see your contributions in a specific format:
Alejandro wrote in https://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/issues/1173
> To be able to review the changes to the manual pages, I'd like to see them in
> patches with commit messages that justifies the changes. A huge diff without
>
Hey Andreas,
It's really easy to reproduce. Just make a git repo, cd into it, and
do "git submodule add https://salsa.debian.org/foo/bar.git";. Then "cd
bar" into the just-created submodule. You will see that you are in a
clone of bar, you can commit and fetch and push and everything, but
.git is
Hi Niels,
On 2025-01-05 13:51, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: important
> X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net,debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
>
> Hi,
>
> I love the idea behind riscv, but I am concerned about riscv's current
> performance. As an example, the build times
Package: atftpd
Version: 0.8.0-5
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi,
If you recompile atftp using LTO, it will crash when sending an error
message.
This was originally reported in Ubuntu and is the reason why Ubuntu
patches this package (they enable LTO by default).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubunt
Package: wnpp
Owner: Boyuan Yang
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: beanquery
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Contact: Martin Blais
* URL : https://github.com/beancount/beanquery
* License : GPL-2.0-only
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Customizable ligh
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 18:25:07 + Scott Ashcroft
wrote:
> I think the fix for this is to add:
>
> -fno-jump-tables
>
> to the OPTIMIZE flags but I don't have atmega8 to test if the
produced
> bootloader actually works.
>
>
I've now managed to find an atmega8 to test and the bootloader produc
Package: procps
Version: 2:4.0.4-6
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: rkitsh...@hotmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
Since clean-up of /etc/sysctl.conf file in favor of sysctl.d/*.conf,
the original sysctl.conf template under /usr/share/doc/procps/examples/ is also
gone.
Please consider adding it back
On 2025-01-08 22:02, Patrick Franz wrote:
You can check if your bug has already been reported at
https://bugs.kde.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=marknote&list_id=3013928,
but it doesn't look that way. Feel free to create a bug there.
Hi,
Please check "forwarded" link.
I've reported it and it see
Hello Patrick,
On 1/8/25 20:52, Patrick Franz wrote:
Am Samstag, 4. Januar 2025, 16:08:05 MEZ schrieb Helge Deller:
Package: kalarm
Version: 4:24.12.0-2
Tags: ftbfs
Usertags: hppa armel armhf i386
kalarm fails in some testcases on 32-bit platforms like this:
FAIL! : KADateTimeTest::construct
Hej,
Am Mittwoch, 1. Januar 2025, 11:34:37 MEZ schrieb Vincas Dargis:
> Package: marknote
> Version: 1.3.0-4
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> KJots no longer works, and it was suggested that Marknote can import
> notes, but it does not work in my case.
>
> With strace, I see this:
>
Hej Helge,
Am Samstag, 4. Januar 2025, 16:08:05 MEZ schrieb Helge Deller:
> Package: kalarm
> Version: 4:24.12.0-2
> Tags: ftbfs
> Usertags: hppa armel armhf i386
>
> kalarm fails in some testcases on 32-bit platforms like this:
>
> FAIL! : KADateTimeTest::constructors() Compared values are not
I'm attaching a debdiff for unstable. The PR has been merged since my
previous message (although through an MR on launchpad).
It unfortunately includes newly-generated certificates.
--
Adrien
diff -Nru breezy-3.3.9/debian/changelog breezy-3.3.9/debian/changelog
--- breezy-3.3.9/debian/changelog
Source: runit
Version: 2.1.2-60
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed from
Source: runit-services
Version: 0.7.2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.8.1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Control: forwarded 1081039 https://github.com/linuxmint/cjs/issues/124
Debian Cinnamon Team,
Could you look into either switching cjs to mozjs128 or fixing the
mozjs115 build failure from https://bugs.debian.org/1084631 ?
Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha
Source: python-handy-archives
Version: 0.2.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250107 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Ent
Source: view3dscene
Version: 4.2.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250107 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering dire
Source: dh-python
Version: 6.20241217
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250107 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering dir
Source: fsspec
Version: 2024.12.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250107 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering direc
Source: gnome-keysign
Version: 1.3.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250107 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering di
Source: edk2
Version: 2024.11-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250107 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory
Source: python-pymzml
Version: 2.5.10+repack1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250107 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: En
Source: python-ly
Version: 0.9.9-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250107 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: nbclassic
Version: 0.3.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250107 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules clean
> dh
Source: aioelectricitymaps
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250107 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules b
Source: gnome-shell
Version: 47.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250107 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This build was done using sbuild from bookworm-backpo
Source: linuxcnc
Version: 2.9.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250107 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> c++ -std=gnu++17 -Wl,-rpa
Source: libmeshb
Version: 7.80-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250107 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /build/reproducible-pat
Source: jupyter-client
Version: 8.6.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250107 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering d
Source: ucspi-tcp
Version: 1:0.88-11
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250107 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This build was done using sbuild from bookworm-backp
Source: daemontools
Version: 1:0.76-13
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250107 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This build was done using sbuild from bookworm-bac
Source: terminator
Version: 2.1.4-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250107 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direc
Source: icu
Version: 72.1-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250107 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering directory '/b
Source: golang-github-containerd-stargz-snapshotter
Version: 0.14.3-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250107 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This build was done
Source: golang-github-safchain-ethtool
Version: 0.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250107 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This build was done using sbuild
Source: libsmbios
Version: 2.4.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250107 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering direct
Source: python-omegaconf
Version: 2.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250107 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> =
Source: ocaml-multicore-magic
Version: 2.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250107 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> +---
Source: prismatic-plumbing-clojure
Version: 0.6.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250107 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]
1 - 100 of 263 matches
Mail list logo
