http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69
--- Comment #6 from marco.le...@gmx.de 2013-07-05 22:17:57 UTC ---
Ok, I'll keep quiet now
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are watching all bug
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 11:32:59PM +0200, Johannes Pfau wrote:
[...]
> I moved the main page contents to
> http://wiki.dlang.org/GDC
>
> So should we use wiki.dlang.org as our main wiki?
I think that's a good idea. Consolidating everything in the main wiki
will make information easier for newbies
Am Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:45:42 +0200
schrieb "Iain Buclaw" :
> Unless Vladimir possibly gives us access to dlang's wiki to post
> the documentation content there. I've opened up a new wiki page
> for people to contribute to.
>
> http://wiki.gdcproject.org
>
>
> Thanks
> Iain.
I moved the main
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 10:04:08PM +0100, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 5 July 2013 19:32, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> >
> > Well, now that I've successfully built gdc-4.8, I'm wondering if I
> > should work on getting it into the Debian repo? Or is somebody
> > already working on that? Iain?
> >
>
> 1. Congra
On 5 July 2013 19:32, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>
> Well, now that I've successfully built gdc-4.8, I'm wondering if I
> should work on getting it into the Debian repo? Or is somebody already
> working on that? Iain?
>
1. Congrats, the first time building gcc is always the hardest. :o)
2. You are at lea
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 08:22:54PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> On 07/05/2013 08:02 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > Thanks so much for posting the exact steps! I finally got around to
> > retrying to build GDC with GCC-4.8. Using your steps above, it
> > worked!!!
>
> Fantastic! So glad it f
On 07/05/2013 08:02 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> Thanks so much for posting the exact steps! I finally got around to
> retrying to build GDC with GCC-4.8. Using your steps above, it worked!!!
Fantastic! So glad it finally worked for you.
> There was no trouble at all, except for an initial hiccup of
On 07/05/2013 08:03 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> Wait, we're trying to D-ify gdmd?
It was a suggestion of Iain's when he forked it off into a separate repo. Seems
like a good idea -- demonstrates D's capabilities, probably makes it easier to
maintain, could make it easier to place back in the main pro
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 07:59:59PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> On 07/05/2013 07:12 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> > On the note of that, is there anyone willing to take the keys for
> > gdmd? :-)
>
> Honestly, I'm not sure I'd know how to handle it. I don't know Perl
> and the kind of D pro
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 06:35:20PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
[...]
> I'll describe exactly what I do.
>
> Let's suppose that we have a directory called $(GDCDIR) that holds
> everything.
>
> In $(GDCDIR)/dev I have my local copy of the GDC git repo. This is
> GDC master, not any of t
On 07/05/2013 07:12 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On the note of that, is there anyone willing to take the keys for gdmd? :-)
Honestly, I'm not sure I'd know how to handle it. I don't know Perl and the
kind of D programming that would be involved in re-implementing it in D is not
what I'm used to.
I
On 5 July 2013 17:35, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
> P.S. You'll probably also want to install gdmd which these days has a separate
> git repo. Very easy to install -- you just need to tweak the Makefile so that
> the install prefix goes where you want it to.
On the note of that, is there anyo
On 07/05/2013 04:40 PM, eles wrote:
> On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 13:45:30 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
>> On 07/05/2013 03:34 PM, eles wrote:
>> Ubuntu 13.04. I have also compiled GDC successfully using 4.8.1 on a
>> cluster in
>> my office which runs Ubuntu 12.04.
>
> Ubuntu 13.10-x86_64
On 07/05/2013 04:25 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> You use gdc at work? :o)
Yup. The day job is in a research group, so I can use what I like. :-)
I did have some worries that if I and colleagues started sharing code we'd have
trouble, as they're mostly wedded to C/C++/Python combinations (and occasio
On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 13:45:30 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
On 07/05/2013 03:34 PM, eles wrote:
Ubuntu 13.04. I have also compiled GDC successfully using
4.8.1 on a cluster in
my office which runs Ubuntu 12.04.
Ubuntu 13.10-x86_64 here (alpha). Do you use these instructions?
http
On 5 July 2013 14:45, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
> On 07/05/2013 03:34 PM, eles wrote:
>> You are lucky. I did not succeed in compiling the gdc master/HEAD on my Linux
>> box,a t least not fully.
>>
>> What system have you?
>
> Ubuntu 13.04. I have also compiled GDC successfully using 4.8.1 o
On 07/05/2013 03:34 PM, eles wrote:
> You are lucky. I did not succeed in compiling the gdc master/HEAD on my Linux
> box,a t least not fully.
>
> What system have you?
Ubuntu 13.04. I have also compiled GDC successfully using 4.8.1 on a cluster in
my office which runs Ubuntu 12.04.
On Wednesday, 3 July 2013 at 12:44:56 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
On Wednesday, 5 June 2013 at 15:55:51 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
On 06/05/2013 05:44 PM, eles wrote:
master currently compiles against gcc-4.8.1, at least on my
system :-)
You are lucky. I did not succeed in compiling the gdc master/HEAD
on my Linux box,a t least not fully.
What sy
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69
--- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw 2013-07-05 12:38:55
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > We could guarantee @safe-ty for builtin functions that are intrinsically
> > expanded by the compiler (have no equivalent library
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69
--- Comment #4 from marco.le...@gmx.de 2013-07-05 10:15:37 UTC ---
In any case nothrow is more important as it cannot easily be contained like
@safe by marking stuff @trusted.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/userprefs.cgi?tab
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69
--- Comment #3 from marco.le...@gmx.de 2013-07-05 10:13:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> We could guarantee @safe-ty for builtin functions that are intrinsically
> expanded by the compiler (have no equivalent library call). Will have to
> th
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw 2013-07-05 10:02:19
UTC ---
The most likely sequence of events were that gdc support was added first (we
were there first, what can I say? :) - then dmd support once its vector support
stabilised. Some time during
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69
--- Comment #1 from marco.le...@gmx.de 2013-07-05 09:42:18 UTC ---
pure is working already. I overlooked that.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You a
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69
Bug #: 69
Summary: core.builtins should be nothrow, pure and probably
@safe
Classification: Unclassified
Product: GDC
Version: 4.8.x
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64
--- Comment #6 from Iain Buclaw 2013-07-05 07:51:09
UTC ---
Hmm I think I just used sed to remove them.
sed -i -s '/^diff/d'
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail b
27 matches
Mail list logo
