http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69
--- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw <ibuc...@gdcproject.org> 2013-07-05 12:38:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > We could guarantee @safe-ty for builtin functions that are intrinsically > > expanded by the compiler (have no equivalent library call). Will have to > > think > > about whether to assume pure/nothrow in that situation also. > > I hoped for something like that. SIMD intrinsics are typically not much more > than an awesome way to express +,-,*,<,>,... They can hardly "throw new > Exception();" and can be @trusted. If they couldn't be trusted you might as > well flag INC, ADD and MOV as @system ;) Well... *cough* - inline assembler is @system, and can not be used in @safe code. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
