http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69
--- Comment #3 from marco.le...@gmx.de 2013-07-05 10:13:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > We could guarantee @safe-ty for builtin functions that are intrinsically > expanded by the compiler (have no equivalent library call). Will have to > think > about whether to assume pure/nothrow in that situation also. I hoped for something like that. SIMD intrinsics are typically not much more than an awesome way to express +,-,*,<,>,... They can hardly "throw new Exception();" and can be @trusted. If they couldn't be trusted you might as well flag INC, ADD and MOV as @system ;) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
