Re: RFR: fftw-3.0.1-1

2005-08-13 Thread James R. Phillips
--- "Gerrit P. Haase" wrote: > [...]However, having the option to install just the runtime for > tools which need it is also nice, the import library and headers are > about 400k which is harddisk space which can be saved then. > OK, so maybe we have three packages: fftw3 with runtime and info d

Re: RFR: fftw-3.0.1-1

2005-08-13 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
James R. Phillips wrote: under /usr/share/doc/fftw3-doc. Would this be an acceptable location for this documentation? Just put it under /usr/share/doc/fftw3-3.0.1 with the README and other docs is ok. --- Corinna Vinschen wrote: The idea is to name the package (and library) so that you ca

Re: RFR: fftw-3.0.1-1

2005-08-13 Thread James R. Phillips
--- Corinna Vinschen wrote: > The idea is to name the package (and library) so that you can add a new > lib package if a new, API incompatible lib version is released. If you're > sure that won't happen, then you're done. Otherwise, you will simplify > your own maintanence work in the future. Lo

Re: RFR: fftw-3.0.1-1

2005-08-13 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 13 10:14, James R. Phillips wrote: > --- Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Packaging looks good, but isn't the name incorrect? Isn't the > > name of the package fftw3, not fftw? > > On Debian that is correct. Also, under the existing cygwin build, libraries > are built with that name, i.e. /us

Re: RFR: fftw-3.0.1-1

2005-08-13 Thread James R. Phillips
--- "Gerrit P. Haase" wrote: s the info files. > > I would appreciate to have the docs and the FAQ installable which are > included as html and or PDF files in the source distribution, preferably > as separate docs package. Who do you think we are, Debian ;) Debian has an fftw3-doc package, whic

Re: RFR: fftw-3.0.1-1

2005-08-13 Thread James R. Phillips
--- Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Packaging looks good, but isn't the name incorrect? Isn't the > name of the package fftw3, not fftw? > On Debian that is correct. Also, under the existing cygwin build, libraries are built with that name, i.e. /usr/lib/libfftw3.la. This is because the api ch

Re: RFR: fftw-3.0.1-1

2005-08-13 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 12 11:19, James R. Phillips wrote: > Hello reviewers/uploaders, > > Please take a look at the proposed fftw-3.0.1-1 package files, located at: > > ftp://antiskid.homelinux.net/pub/fftw/setup.hint > ftp://antiskid.homelinux.net/pub/fftw/fftw-3.0.1-1-src.tar.bz2 > ftp://antiskid.homelinux.ne

Re: RFR: fftw-3.0.1-1

2005-08-13 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
James R. Phillips wrote: Hello reviewers/uploaders, Please take a look at the proposed fftw-3.0.1-1 package files, located at: ftp://antiskid.homelinux.net/pub/fftw/setup.hint ftp://antiskid.homelinux.net/pub/fftw/fftw-3.0.1-1-src.tar.bz2 ftp://antiskid.homelinux.net/pub/fftw/fftw-3.0.1-1.tar.