--- Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Packaging looks good, but isn't the name incorrect? Isn't the > name of the package fftw3, not fftw? >
On Debian that is correct. Also, under the existing cygwin build, libraries are built with that name, i.e. /usr/lib/libfftw3.la. This is because the api changed with release 3, so upstream built that feature in to the makefile. If I name the package fftw3, it will be consistent with the library name, but inconsistent with the upstream source file name (fftw-3.0.1.tar.gz). As it is, (fftw) it is inconsistent with the library names. So which correspondence is more important to maintain: consistency with the library names, or consistency with the upstream source file name?
