On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:59:07 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Exactly. The question is then, what patches from the 4.5.3 gcc were
> not applied upstream and still make sense today.
I have a copy of the patchset here with a few additions of my own:
http://cygwin-ports.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitw
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 05:48:20AM +0800, JonY wrote:
>Who is the upstream GCC maintainer for Cygwin anyway?
It's Dave Korn, Kai Tietz, and me. I haven't been active for years
though. If you have patches that you'd like to get in maybe Kai
could expedite that.
cgf
On 2/21/2013 10:48 PM, JonY wrote:
I have not looked at all the patches closely, but some of them were not
merged in gcc-4.7.2, at least the peflags patch did not.
Who is the upstream GCC maintainer for Cygwin anyway?
I would guess Dave Korn
Marco
On 2/22/2013 00:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 21 11:31, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
>> On 21 February 2013 10:38, NightStrike wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 21 21:33, JonY wrote:
> On 2/21/2013 20:40, NightStrike wrote:
>>> I've started loo
On Feb 21 11:31, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
> On 21 February 2013 10:38, NightStrike wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> On Feb 21 21:33, JonY wrote:
> >>> On 2/21/2013 20:40, NightStrike wrote:
> >>> >> I've started looking at the patches, they definitely aren't tr
On 21 February 2013 10:38, NightStrike wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Feb 21 21:33, JonY wrote:
>>> On 2/21/2013 20:40, NightStrike wrote:
>>> >> I've started looking at the patches, they definitely aren't trivial.
>>> >> I'll probably be releasing it as exp
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 21 21:33, JonY wrote:
>> On 2/21/2013 20:40, NightStrike wrote:
>> >> I've started looking at the patches, they definitely aren't trivial.
>> >> I'll probably be releasing it as experimental.
>> >
>> > There are local cygwin patches
On 2/21/2013 21:42, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 21 21:33, JonY wrote:
>> On 2/21/2013 20:40, NightStrike wrote:
I've started looking at the patches, they definitely aren't trivial.
I'll probably be releasing it as experimental.
>>>
>>> There are local cygwin patches to gcc?
>>>
>>
>>
On Feb 21 21:33, JonY wrote:
> On 2/21/2013 20:40, NightStrike wrote:
> >> I've started looking at the patches, they definitely aren't trivial.
> >> I'll probably be releasing it as experimental.
> >
> > There are local cygwin patches to gcc?
> >
>
> Yes, about 100KB of it. I confess I don't kno
On 2/21/2013 20:40, NightStrike wrote:
>> I've started looking at the patches, they definitely aren't trivial.
>> I'll probably be releasing it as experimental.
>
> There are local cygwin patches to gcc?
>
Yes, about 100KB of it. I confess I don't know what most of is for, my
understanding of th
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:53 AM, JonY <10wa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/19/2013 20:53, JonY wrote:
>> On 2/19/2013 19:46, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>>> On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:21:56 +0800, JonY wrote:
I can give Cygwin GCC a try over the weekends. Not sure if it is too
complicated.
>>>
On 2/19/2013 20:53, JonY wrote:
> On 2/19/2013 19:46, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:21:56 +0800, JonY wrote:
>>> I can give Cygwin GCC a try over the weekends. Not sure if it is too
>>> complicated.
>>>
>>> Well, if someone else wants to take maintainership, feel free to over
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
