On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Feb 21 21:33, JonY wrote: >> On 2/21/2013 20:40, NightStrike wrote: >> >> I've started looking at the patches, they definitely aren't trivial. >> >> I'll probably be releasing it as experimental. >> > >> > There are local cygwin patches to gcc? >> > >> >> Yes, about 100KB of it. I confess I don't know what most of is for, my >> understanding of the gcc internals are limited. > > I assume some (or all) of them are already upstream, but they were not > backported into the 4.5.x branch. It might be a good idea to start out > with a clean upstream build and then look into the patches if they still > make some sense.
Are they in 4.6? If so, why not just start fresh and clean with a 4.6 'chain that needs zero patching?
