On 21 February 2013 10:38, NightStrike wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Feb 21 21:33, JonY wrote: >>> On 2/21/2013 20:40, NightStrike wrote: >>> >> I've started looking at the patches, they definitely aren't trivial. >>> >> I'll probably be releasing it as experimental. >>> > >>> > There are local cygwin patches to gcc? >>> > >>> >>> Yes, about 100KB of it. I confess I don't know what most of is for, my >>> understanding of the gcc internals are limited. >> >> I assume some (or all) of them are already upstream, but they were not >> backported into the 4.5.x branch. It might be a good idea to start out >> with a clean upstream build and then look into the patches if they still >> make some sense. > > Are they in 4.6? If so, why not just start fresh and clean with a 4.6 > 'chain that needs zero patching?
I believe Corinna means going to later version of GCC, preferably straight to 4.7 would be great. Chris -- Chris Sutcliffe http://emergedesktop.org http://www.google.com/profiles/ir0nh34d
