Version 4.12.0-1 of "rpm" has been uploaded.
RPM is well-known package manager originated from Redhat. The purpose
of porting it to cygwin is
*** CYGWIN-ANNOUNCE UNSUBSCRIBE INFO ***
If you want to unsubscribe from the cygwin-announce mailing list, look at the
"L
Version 4.12.0-1 of "rpm" has been uploaded.
RPM is well-known package manager originated from Redhat. The purpose
of porting it to cygwin is
*** CYGWIN-ANNOUNCE UNSUBSCRIBE INFO ***
If you want to unsubscribe from the cygwin-announce mailing list, look at the
"L
On Aug 8 14:39, Michel Samia wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I used apt-cyg to install package ‘rpm’. Then when I run ‘rpm’, I got that
> there is libnss3 library missing, so I installed it. Then I see
>
> $ rpm
> /usr/bin/rpm.exe: error while loading shared libraries: ?: cannot open
Hello,
I used apt-cyg to install package ‘rpm’. Then when I run ‘rpm’, I got that
there is libnss3 library missing, so I installed it. Then I see
$ rpm
/usr/bin/rpm.exe: error while loading shared libraries: ?: cannot open shared
object file: No such file or directory
Do you see the same
Ahh, interesting, I'll have to break that again and see if it needs a
valid username. Thanks for the idea!
Matt
On Thu, 2014-08-07 at 15:08 -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 2014-08-07 15:01, Matt Rose wrote:
> > I've noticed that the newer version of the rpm-build package
On 2014-08-07 15:01, Matt Rose wrote:
I've noticed that the newer version of the rpm-build package (4.11-1)
has a really severe bug in that it ignores the %defattr flag in the %
files section of .spec files
Note that a default %defattr is provided since rpm-4.4, and therefore
most uses
I've noticed that the newer version of the rpm-build package (4.11-1)
has a really severe bug in that it ignores the %defattr flag in the %
files section of .spec files, so that when you try to build a file with
a files section like
%files
%defattr(-,root,root)
/tmp/foo
You get the erro
On 15/01/2014 06:38, Lord Laraby wrote:
So, does cygwin now support installing software via Redhat Package
Manager?
No. That I am aware of
Or is this RPM just a cross install tool just used for cygwin
on linux boxen?
something like that
I tried to build RPM many long moons ago when
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:38:18AM -0500, Lord Laraby wrote:
>So, does cygwin now support installing software via Redhat Package
>Manager?
No, of course not.
>Or is this RPM just a cross install tool just used for cygwin on linux
>boxen?
We've had an rpm binary in the distribu
So, does cygwin now support installing software via Redhat Package
Manager? Or is this RPM just a cross install tool just used for cygwin
on linux boxen?
I tried to build RPM many long moons ago when cygwin was young, but
other than very simple src packages, most everything failed to
configure or
Ken wrote:
Hello,
There appears to be a problem with the 'RPM' utility,
as it produces no output, not even for --version or
--help.
It appears all dependencies are installed. I could
not find any reports on this (bug?) in the lists, so
here are the details.
- 'rpm --v
Christopher Faylor cygwin.com> writes:
> I have made a new version of rpm available for installation. rpm is the
> Linux package management system used by Fedora, SuSE and others.
There is a packaging or upload error with these:
-rw-r--r-- 1 user users 1084632 29. Nov 16:19 rpm-4.11.1
I have made a new version of rpm available for installation. rpm is the
Linux package management system used by Fedora, SuSE and others.
This is just a long-delayed refresh of rpm from upstream sources. It
obsoletes the rpm-doc package and adds the rpm-devel package which
contains files needed
or build.sh and check.sh, in the directory
ncbi-blast-2.2.26+\c++\compilers\cygwin\, which is similar to the
package ncbi-blast-2.2.26+-src.tar.gz. I was stuck with "checking for
python" when compiling ncbi-blast-2.2.26+-src.tar.gz.
Well, then they are doing something s
On 2012-4-19 7:09, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote:
De-Jian,
Hello. It's me again.
I suspect that just writing wrapper scripts would be faster than playing
with RPMs and/or trying to compile blast yourself.
As I understand it, blast programs are all command-line. I think
that the eas
On 4/18/2012 12:21 PM, De-Jian Zhao wrote:
Is there a way to export the package info or lib
info of setup.exe to rpm? If they can share information, the problem
will be easily solved.
Big "if".
I said it before, but a .src.rpm built for one Linux distribution
typically wil
De-Jian,
Hello. It's me again.
I suspect that just writing wrapper scripts would be faster than playing
with RPMs and/or trying to compile blast yourself.
As I understand it, blast programs are all command-line. I think
that the easiest thing would be to just use the Windows version
supplied b
On 2012-04-18 13:21, De-Jian Zhao wrote:
As to cygport, it seems that a *.cygport file is required. How to get
the file?
You have to write one. API documentation is included in the cygport
manual, and Ports git has thousands of examples to learn from.
Yaakov
--
Problem reports: http
On 4/18/2012 2:30 PM, Earnie Boyd wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:21 PM, De-Jian Zhao wrote:
Thank you, Christopher. Is there a way to export the package info or lib
info of setup.exe to rpm? If they can share information, the problem will be
easily solved.
You can always read the source
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:21 PM, De-Jian Zhao wrote:
>
> Thank you, Christopher. Is there a way to export the package info or lib
> info of setup.exe to rpm? If they can share information, the problem will be
> easily solved.
>
You can always read the source code to determine
the error message after installing some
packages to satisfy the dependencies, I was wondering why the rpm
package still complained about the already installed packages. I was
not aware that cygwin and rpm were not sharing the 'database'. Thank
you for making it clear to me.I will try t
On 2012-4-19 0:58, Linda Walsh wrote:
De-Jian Zhao wrote:
Thank you, Linda. When I saw the error message after installing some
packages to satisfy the dependencies, I was wondering why the rpm
package still complained about the already installed packages. I was
not aware that cygwin and
saw the error message after installing some
>>> packages to satisfy the dependencies, I was wondering why the rpm
>>> package still complained about the already installed packages. I was
>>> not aware that cygwin and rpm were not sharing the 'database'. T
De-Jian Zhao wrote:
Thank you, Linda. When I saw the error message after installing some
packages to satisfy the dependencies, I was wondering why the rpm
package still complained about the already installed packages. I was not
aware that cygwin and rpm were not sharing the 'dat
On 2012-4-18 22:03, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 09:13:20PM +0800, De-Jian Zhao wrote:
On 2012-4-17 13:58, Linda Walsh wrote:
[snip]
Thank you, Linda. When I saw the error message after installing some
packages to satisfy the dependencies, I was wondering why the rpm
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 09:13:20PM +0800, De-Jian Zhao wrote:
>On 2012-4-17 13:58, Linda Walsh wrote:
>>[snip]
>Thank you, Linda. When I saw the error message after installing some
>packages to satisfy the dependencies, I was wondering why the rpm
>package still complained
On 2012-4-17 13:58, Linda Walsh wrote:
De-Jian Zhao wrote:
Dear all,
I noticed that there is a command - rpm - under Cygwin 1.7. Does that
mean RPM packages can be installed into Cygwin?
I tried to install ncbi-blast-2.2.26+-3.i686.rpm (see:
ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/executables
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:58:03PM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote:
>De-Jian Zhao wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I noticed that there is a command - rpm - under Cygwin 1.7. Does that
>> mean RPM packages can be installed into Cygwin?
>>
>> I tried to install n
python was
installed. That's to say, I installed the latest python and the
compilation could find it, but the compilation tried to search for
python2.3 and 2.4 further, and stopped when searching for 2.4.
I ran into a sim bug in the rpm build script.
It's python comp
De-Jian Zhao wrote:
Dear all,
I noticed that there is a command - rpm - under Cygwin 1.7. Does that
mean RPM packages can be installed into Cygwin?
I tried to install ncbi-blast-2.2.26+-3.i686.rpm (see:
ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/executables/blast+/LATEST/ ) into
Cygwin 1.7.13 with
On 4/9/2012 11:48 PM, De-Jian Zhao wrote:
I wrote to the help desk of NCBI Blast+. They have no guidelines
for Cygwin users and also suggested the windows version.
It sounds like the Cygwin port is abandoned, then. You should consider
adopting it.
Yes, it's a fair bit of work, and I wouldn'
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 02:03:29PM +0800, De-Jian Zhao wrote:
>It seems that the compilation under Cygwin is more complicated than
>expected.
Sometimes it is, especially when you are not quite sure what you're
doing, and the upstream project has made regrettable decisions about
compiling for Cygwi
+ users on the BLAST+ mailing
list than on the Cygwin list, so you'd have a better chance of getting
a solution by sending the config.log file to that list than continuing
to pursue this problem here.
Instead of trying to start with RPM, I'd recommend figuring out how to
build BLAST+ to
ython", even if python was
installed. That's to say, I installed the latest python and the
compilation could find it, but the compilation tried to search for
python2.3 and 2.4 further, and stopped when searching for 2.4.
What I am concern is that whether the i686.rpm indicates it is prepared
han continuing to
pursue this problem here.
Instead of trying to start with RPM, I'd recommend figuring out how to
build BLAST+ to build from source first. You need that experience to
help you build binary packages.
I think you'll have an easier time learning to build a native Cyg
t;>> compilation stopped at "checking for python", even if python was
>>> installed. That's to say, I installed the latest python and the
>>> compilation could find it, but the compilation tried to search for
>>> python2.3 and 2.4 further, and stopped when sear
python and the
compilation could find it, but the compilation tried to search for
python2.3 and 2.4 further, and stopped when searching for 2.4.
What I am concern is that whether the i686.rpm indicates it is prepared
for cygwin. As you know, when you run "uname -smo" , you can get
something
ind it, but the compilation tried to search for
python2.3 and 2.4 further, and stopped when searching for 2.4.
What I am concern is that whether the i686.rpm indicates it is prepared
for cygwin. As you know, when you run "uname -smo" , you can get
something like this "CYGWIN_NT-5.1 i686 Cyg
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 6:10 AM, De-Jian Zhao wrote:
> What I am concern is that whether the i686.rpm indicates it is prepared for
> cygwin. As you know, when you run "uname -smo" , you can get something like
> this "CYGWIN_NT-5.1 i686 Cygwin". I think the packag
On 2012-4-7 16:12, marco atzeri wrote:
On 4/7/2012 9:40 AM, De-Jian Zhao wrote:
Dear all,
I noticed that there is a command - rpm - under Cygwin 1.7. Does that
mean RPM packages can be installed into Cygwin?
I tried to install ncbi-blast-2.2.26+-3.i686.rpm (see:
ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
On 4/7/2012 9:40 AM, De-Jian Zhao wrote:
Dear all,
I noticed that there is a command - rpm - under Cygwin 1.7. Does that
mean RPM packages can be installed into Cygwin?
I tried to install ncbi-blast-2.2.26+-3.i686.rpm (see:
ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/executables/blast+/LATEST/ ) into
Dear all,
I noticed that there is a command - rpm - under Cygwin 1.7. Does that
mean RPM packages can be installed into Cygwin?
I tried to install ncbi-blast-2.2.26+-3.i686.rpm (see:
ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/executables/blast+/LATEST/ ) into
Cygwin 1.7.13 with the command "in
On Mar 23 12:47, Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
> The rpm and rpm-build packages both require cygintl-2.dll, provided by
> the libintl2 package, but don't have this as a dependency.
>
> Or, at least, when I installed rpm and rpm-build, Setup.exe didn't
> automatically pick up l
> On 13 March 2011 11:36, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Mar 12 23:37, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> >> In response to recent inquiries, I have created a repository of
> >> Linux-to-Cygwin cross-compilers for Fedora 14 i686 and x86_64 which
> >> include GCC, Cygwin, and a handful of libraries. Also i
On 13 March 2011 11:36, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 12 23:37, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>> In response to recent inquiries, I have created a repository of
>> Linux-to-Cygwin cross-compilers for Fedora 14 i686 and x86_64 which
>> include GCC, Cygwin, and a handful of libraries. Also included ar
2011/3/14 Corinna Vinschen:
> On Mar 14 14:08, René Berber wrote:
>> On 3/14/2011 3:59 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>> > I also found another strange problem. It's practically impossible to
>> > debug a Cygwin DLL built with this gcc/g++. The debug line number
>> > information appears
On Mar 15 08:58, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 15 00:48, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> > P.S. I see that you already used this to fix the gcc-4.5 warnings in
> > winsup/cygwin, but you only applied those to your post-1.7.9 branch.
> > Any chance you could commit those to HEAD now as well?
>
> I ra
On Mar 15 00:48, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 10:59 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Mar 13 23:24, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> > > I just added a cygwin-binutils-devel package with the necessary headers
> > > and static libraries.
> > >
> > > The only trick is you need to m
On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 10:59 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 13 23:24, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> > I just added a cygwin-binutils-devel package with the necessary headers
> > and static libraries.
> >
> > The only trick is you need to manually
> > remove /usr/i686-pc-cygwin/lib/libiberty.a
On Mar 14 14:08, René Berber wrote:
> On 3/14/2011 3:59 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > I also found another strange problem. It's practically impossible to
> > debug a Cygwin DLL built with this gcc/g++. The debug line number
> > information appears to be screwed up.
>
> You need gd
On 3/14/2011 3:59 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
[snip]
> I also found another strange problem. It's practically impossible to
> debug a Cygwin DLL built with this gcc/g++. The debug line number
> information appears to be screwed up.
You need gdb 7.0 or above (current is 7.2 and builds out of the
On Mar 13 23:24, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 12:36 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > this offer is way cool. Thanks for doing this, because this allows my lazy
> > self to switch to the latest gcc to build Cygwin without having to build
> > the compiler and all the stuff myse
On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 12:36 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> this offer is way cool. Thanks for doing this, because this allows my lazy
> self to switch to the latest gcc to build Cygwin without having to build
> the compiler and all the stuff myself. Really cool.
Glad to help.
> I've just test
GCC, Cygwin, and a handful of libraries. Also included are the
>> necessary mingw32 packages with static libraries for cross-compiling
>> Cygwin's setup.exe.
>>
>> These packages can be installed with Yum and the PackageKit frontends by
>> first downloadin
ackages with static libraries for cross-compiling
> Cygwin's setup.exe.
>
> These packages can be installed with Yum and the PackageKit frontends by
> first downloading and installing the release RPM from Sourceforge:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/fedora-cygwin/fi
p.exe.
These packages can be installed with Yum and the PackageKit frontends by
first downloading and installing the release RPM from Sourceforge:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/fedora-cygwin/files/
As these are not official products of the Cygwin project, please direct
any questions or issues to the c
Hello, I'm trying to use the --prefix command to relocate an RPM on install.
When building the spec file then running the command:
rpm -Uvh --prefix /opt/drew rpm-name.rpm
In a Unix environment it works fine and installs to /opt/drew. However when
running the same command in Cygwin it ig
SJ Kissane wrote:
Hi all
I've become interested in making a Cygwin distribution based on RPM.
My main reasons for doing this:
(1) I come from a RHEL/OEL/Fedora background, so I'd rather use yum
than setup.exe
(2) I like the fact that rpm has a proper database of which file owns
whi
2008/6/16 SJ Kissane:
> Please find attached cyg2rpm.pl, which converts Cygwin binary packages
> into RPMs.
> Of course, this is just a hacky first attempt, but it shows where I'm going.
>
> Example of usage:
> $ ./cyg2rpm.pl http://mirror.aarnet.edu.au/pub/cygwin/ work
I prefer working with a loc
Hi all
I've become interested in making a Cygwin distribution based on RPM.
My main reasons for doing this:
(1) I come from a RHEL/OEL/Fedora background, so I'd rather use yum
than setup.exe
(2) I like the fact that rpm has a proper database of which file owns
which package, so I can
Hi all
I have been trying to get rpm-4.4.2.3 to compile under Cygwin.
I'm almost there, I think, but am just getting stuck at the end.
Please see the attached shell script.
The problem where it gets stuck is the final link of RPM,
where it can't find the beecrypt libraries
I'v
) containing the
> following file: test.spec
> Name: test
> Version: 0
> Release: 0
> Summary: test
> Group: test/test
> License: GPL
>
> %description
>
> And then calling: rpmbuild -ta test.tar.gz
Thanks for the simple testcase: you are definitely right about i
Christopher Faylor cygwin.com> writes:
> I'm struggling to understand what "tar" has to do with rpm. I think
> you probably need to do more debugging of this situation.
Please take a look at the -t parameter of rpmbuild:
The argument used is -b if a spec file is
On 27 December 2006 12:40, Dick wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm using rpmbuild to build a RPM package from a tarball but it doesn't
> work:
>
> $ rpmbuild -ta SOURCES/daco-0.tar.gz
> error: Failed to rename /home/eeto003/SPECS/rpm-spec.LpULlm to
> /home/dick/SPEC
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 12:40:01PM +, Dick wrote:
>I'm using rpmbuild to build a RPM package from a tarball but it doesn't work:
>
>$ rpmbuild -ta SOURCES/daco-0.tar.gz
>error: Failed to rename /home/eeto003/SPECS/rpm-spec.LpULlm to
>/home/dick/SPECS/tar: Pattern ma
Hi all,
I'm using rpmbuild to build a RPM package from a tarball but it doesn't work:
$ rpmbuild -ta SOURCES/daco-0.tar.gz
error: Failed to rename /home/eeto003/SPECS/rpm-spec.LpULlm to
/home/dick/SPECS/tar: Pattern matching characters used in file names. Please,: m
It seems like tar
Arian Hojat wrote:
Hello all,
New to the list. enjoying messing around with cygwin as I haven't
dabbled in
linux for a year (and haven't ever messed with cygwin until recently).
(long story short: Getting message 'You need Mesa or an OpenGL-System
to compile Armagetron.' wh
Hello all,
New to the list. enjoying messing around with cygwin as I haven't dabbled in
linux for a year (and haven't ever messed with cygwin until recently).
(long story short: Getting message 'You need Mesa or an OpenGL-System
to compile Armagetron.' when compiling src rpm)
for Cygwin.
>
>> I think the OP is probably following the directions on the tinyos download
>> pages for windows. It should all work once the official Cygwin version of
>> rpm is installed using setup. The rpm packages in question do appear to
>> be cygwin-specific, so point
he directions on the tinyos download
> pages for windows. It should all work once the official Cygwin version of
> rpm is installed using setup. The rpm packages in question do appear to
> be cygwin-specific, so point 2 above does not apply.
No, the directions for installing under Cygwin
René Berber wrote:
> Tasica Mabaya wrote:
>
>> I have an quastion regarding RPM instalation. I'm trying to install
>> tinyos on cygwin, and after downloading the neccesary packets I got a
>> message:
>> bash: rpm: command not found
>>
>> I I w
Tasica Mabaya wrote:
> I have an quastion regarding RPM instalation. I'm trying to install
> tinyos on cygwin, and after downloading the neccesary packets I got a
> message:
> bash: rpm: command not found
>
> I I wanted to install rpm, and I found it on
> http://sourc
Hello,
I have an quastion regarding RPM instalation. I'm trying to install tinyos
on cygwin, and after downloading the neccesary packets I got a message:
bash: rpm: command not found
I I wanted to install rpm, and I found it on
http://sourceforge.net/projects/cygwin-rpm/ but when I dow
from rpm-4.1-2-src.tar.bz2 (mirrors.rcn.net)
first error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ ./rpm-4.1-1.sh
./rpm-4.1-1.sh: line 69: syntax error near unexpected token `&&'
./rpm-4.1-1.sh: line 69: ` && mkdirs) # && \'
errort so far:
--- rpm-4.1-1.sh.orig 2005-09-1
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005, Brian Dessent wrote:
This means you
won't be able to install/remove any of those packages with rpm because
it's impossible to replace in-use files under Windows and rpm does not
know how to do it the windows-way.
http://www.thescarms.com/vbasic/FilesInUse.a
AFAIK, rpm has been ported for a long time.
Has anyone looked into porting Conectiva's apt-rpm?
-- Colin
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.htm
st because I run cron
now...but that replacement issue is already solved in current
setup framework.
So, the new setup would need create a temporary cygwin environment
that is totally separate from any already installed cygwin
environment. The environment could have rpm and do updates pointing
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 7:36 PM
> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re: setup package format v. rpm, reasoning?
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 04:36:2
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 04:36:29PM -0800, Linda W wrote:
>I can imagine during the early development of cygwin, the rpm
>package types were rather "unsupportable" -- especially on a
>"first install", since no unix shell or coreutils are available.
>
>However, a
On Feb 15, 2005, at 4:36 PM, Linda W wrote:
I can imagine during the early development of cygwin, the rpm
package types were rather "unsupportable" -- especially on a
"first install", since no unix shell or coreutils are available.
However, after the basic support is ins
At 07:36 PM 2/15/2005, you wrote:
>I can imagine during the early development of cygwin, the rpm
>package types were rather "unsupportable" -- especially on a
>"first install", since no unix shell or coreutils are available.
>
>However, after the basic support i
I can imagine during the early development of cygwin, the rpm
package types were rather "unsupportable" -- especially on a
"first install", since no unix shell or coreutils are available.
However, after the basic support is installed, what was the reasoning
for keep
Hi guys,
I'm using the rpm 4.1-1 package and I noticed that RPM_INSTALL_PREFIX is never
set even in case we specify the --prefix or --relocate options. It looks like
this bug is well known on this version (see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75550).
I'm unfortu
Hello
i need to recompile rpm-4.1 from sources but when it is trying to
compile in db3/lock i have :
cc -c -I. -I../db/dist/../include -I../db/dist/../include_auto -O2 -g
-D_GNU_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wno-char-subscripts ../db
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Igor Pechtchanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 24 March, 2004 5:29 PM
To: Pikovsky Bella-BBP006
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: How to upgrate rpm from 4.1 to 4.2?
Bella,
Please configure your mailer to not quote raw e-mail addresses in
When Cygwin rpm v4.2 is planned to be released?
Thanks
Bella
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
e) spare time.
Igor
[*] You might make it easier for him to notice your message by putting
something like "[Attn: Dario Alcocer]", or, better yet, "[Attn: rpm
maintainer]", in the subject.
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Pikovsky Bella-BBP006 wrote:
> First of all thanks for t
ECTED]
Subject: Re: How to upgrate rpm from 4.1 to 4.2?
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Pikovsky Bella-BBP006 wrote:
> Cygwin comes with rpm 4.1 version. How can I upgrate it to 4.2?
> Thanks
>Bella
Umm, wait until Dario Alcocer (ther current maintainer) releases 4.2, or
build it yourself
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Pikovsky Bella-BBP006 wrote:
> Cygwin comes with rpm 4.1 version. How can I upgrate it to 4.2?
> Thanks
>Bella
Umm, wait until Dario Alcocer (ther current maintainer) releases 4.2, or
build it yourself (and, perhaps, volunteer to maintain it if Dar
> Cygwin comes with rpm 4.1 version. How can I upgrate it to 4.2?
>
> Thanks
> Bella
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/d
* Jimmi Wolf (2004-02-17 11:22 +0100)
> Is it possible to execute a RPM file in cygwin, and if yes, how???
What do you mean by "execute a RPM file"? RPM files are not
executable. If you mean "open" then "yes". Just install rpm. If you
mean "install", p
Hello
Is it possible to execute a RPM file in cygwin, and if yes, how???
Thnaks
Jimmi
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.583 / Virus Database: 369 - Release Date: 10-02-2004
--
Unsubscribe info: http
The rpm source package is broken. rpm-4.1-1.patch refers to files that
does not exist in the db3 subdirectory and patch fails.
---8<---8<---8<---
rpm-4.1/doc/sk/rpm.8
patching file rpm-4.1/CYGWIN-PATCHES/postinstall.sh
patching file rpm-4.1/CYGWIN-PATCHES/rpm.README
patching file rpm-4
Martin Gainty wrote:
Hello All:
Does cygwin support rpm's..perhaps a rpm binary?
See:
<http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=rpm.exe>
--
Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838
Hello All:
Does cygwin support rpm's..perhaps a rpm binary?
Many Thanks,
Martin
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwi
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 07:53:17PM -0400, Martin Gainty wrote:
>+1 for ant support
>Now that ant has support for cc I dont see the use for archaic makefiles
I don't know what "+1" is supposed to signify but, assuming that this is
a vote, I have to remind you that this is not a voting type of situa
+1 for ant support
Now that ant has support for cc I dont see the use for archaic makefiles
Martin
- Original Message -
From: "Dario Alcocer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 6:35 PM
Subject: RPM support (was Re: qmail port s
o
> > have a "fake" local setup.ini, starting setup, let it install the
> > package... this would need some command line "installed package db"
> > management of some kind. Or it is already out there, only I didn't
> > notice it?
>
> Isn't
On 29 Mar 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 21:04, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Charles Wilson wrote:
> > > Robert Collins wrote:
> > >> I find this concern mystifiying though, we've had an rpm port from
> > >
Hello,
I'm going to try and link setup.exe against librpm, to make it possible (and
"feasible" ;-)) setup.exe and rpm both to be reciprocly updated.
I'm diving, and I give news when I emerge (or drawn...)
>-- Message original --
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: Cha
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
