Hi, On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 6:10 AM, De-Jian Zhao wrote: > What I am concern is that whether the i686.rpm indicates it is prepared for > cygwin. As you know, when you run "uname -smo" , you can get something like > this "CYGWIN_NT-5.1 i686 Cygwin". I think the package > ncbi-blast-2.2.26+-3.i686.rpm is for Cygwin. Is that right? Has anyone ever > succeeded in installing a RPM package into cygwin using "rpm -i *rpm"?
It is highly unlikely that any *86.rpm is for Cygwin. Cygwin is not the only Unix-like environment that runs on Intel processors :) The binaries are probably for some Linux version. Csaba -- GCS a+ e++ d- C++ ULS$ L+$ !E- W++ P+++$ w++$ tv+ b++ DI D++ 5++ The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers. Life is complex, with real and imaginary parts. "Ok, it boots. Which means it must be bug-free and perfect. " -- Linus Torvalds "People disagree with me. I just ignore them." -- Linus Torvalds -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
