Re: Question about the ls command

2002-10-30 Thread Stan Horwitz
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Randall R Schulz wrote: > > [ Move along...Move along. Nothing Cygwin-specific here. Just an RTFM. ] > > > Stan, > > Use the "--full-time" option. Although the resulting format is distinct > from either the "recent" or "old" date formats shown in the "-l" output > format, it i

Re: Question about the ls command

2002-10-30 Thread Randall R Schulz
Stan, If that's so, then you're not invoking "ls" directly or you're not invoking Cygwin's ls. (Both of those invocations work find for me, by the way.) Perhaps there's an alias, a function or a script intervening that's \defined under the assumption of a simpler (or simply an alternate) kind o

Re: Question about the ls command

2002-10-30 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Stan Horwitz wrote: > On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Cliff Hones wrote: > > > > The 'man' command is your friend. If you run "man ls" you will > > find many options for controlling the output of ls, including > > --full-time, which is probably what you need. > > Sorry, I should have st

RE: Question about the ls command

2002-10-30 Thread Pavel Rozenboim
> -Original Message- > From: Stan Horwitz [mailto:stan@;temple.edu] > Sent: Wed, October 30, 2002 6:57 PM > To: Cliff Hones > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Question about the ls command > > > > > On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Cliff Hones wrote: > &g

Re: Question about the ls command

2002-10-30 Thread Stan Horwitz
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Cliff Hones wrote: > > The 'man' command is your friend. If you run "man ls" you will > find many options for controlling the output of ls, including > --full-time, which is probably what you need. Sorry, I should have stated that I checked the man page. When I do something

Re: Question about the ls command

2002-10-30 Thread Randall R Schulz
[ Move along...Move along. Nothing Cygwin-specific here. Just an RTFM. ] Stan, Use the "--full-time" option. Although the resulting format is distinct from either the "recent" or "old" date formats shown in the "-l" output format, it is uniform with no sensitivity to how far distant is the r

RE: Question about the ls command

2002-10-30 Thread Harig, Mark A.
See also, 'ls --help' and 'info ls' (this requires that the 'info' package be installed). > > The 'man' command is your friend. If you run "man ls" you will > find many options for controlling the output of ls, including > --full-time, which is probably what you need. > > -- Cliff > -- Unsubs

Re: Question about the ls command

2002-10-30 Thread Cliff Hones
Stan Horwitz wrote: > I am new to cygwin, as I have just installed it on a Windows 2000 system, > so I hope this question is not a faq. > > With the "ls -l" command, the modification date of Windows files is > shown, however, the format of this date varies. On files from a previous > year, the ye

Question about the ls command

2002-10-30 Thread Stan Horwitz
Hello; I am new to cygwin, as I have just installed it on a Windows 2000 system, so I hope this question is not a faq. With the "ls -l" command, the modification date of Windows files is shown, however, the format of this date varies. On files from a previous year, the year of last modificatatio