@@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ Non-comprehensive list of changes in this release
- Support parsing the `cc` operand modifier and alias it to the `c` modifier
(#GH127719).
- Added `__builtin_elementwise_exp10`.
+- Added `__builtin_is_modifiable_lvalue` to identify assignable arguments in
@@ -1849,8 +1852,9 @@ TEST_F(StructuralEquivalenceCacheTest, ReturnStmtNonEq) {
Lang_CXX03);
StructuralEquivalenceContext Ctx(
- get<0>(TU)->getASTContext(), get<1>(TU)->getASTContext(),
- NonEquivalentDecls, StructuralEquivalenceKind::Default, false, false);
lyledean1 wrote:
Happy to adjust this @MagentaTreehouse for LLVM 20 - what would that require?
@erichkeane is this ok to merge (assuming I make the changes for the above -
the CI has passed)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132116
___
cfe-co
@@ -0,0 +1,1059 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: opt --passes=loop-vectorize --mtriple=riscv64 -mattr="+zvfh,+v" -S < %s
| FileCheck %s --check-prefix=RV64
+; RUN: opt --passes=loop-vectorize --mtriple=aa
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133550
None
>From 9d1f0d61d9caffdf9021861bbfef39247c4cfb74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kazu Hirata
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 21:16:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [CodeGen] Use llvm::reverse (NFC)
---
clang/lib/Cod
https://github.com/mydeveloperday approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132882
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1,24 +1,10 @@
-/*
- * Copyright (c) 2015 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
- *
- * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
- * of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to
deal
- * in the Software without restriction
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Ryosuke Niwa (rniwa)
Changes
This PR adds the support for recognizing calling adoptCF/adoptNS on the result
of a cast operation on the return value of a function which creates NS or CF
types. It also fixes a bug that we weren't reporting
https://github.com/owenca closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132519
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -4920,6 +4920,116 @@ If no address spaces names are provided, all address
spaces are fenced.
__builtin_amdgcn_fence(__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST, "workgroup", "local")
__builtin_amdgcn_fence(__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST, "workgroup", "local", "global")
+__builtin_amdgcn_processor_is and __bui
firewave wrote:
> I am seeing this with an enum type which might be valid, working code but
> have not looked into it yet.
The warnings in question were correct. It exposed a behavior change introduced
by fixing `performance-enum-size`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127720
___
https://github.com/AaronBallman updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133125
>From 75ef42d644da9136fb07014ade18b6be137426a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aaron Ballman
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 12:54:29 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] [C2y] Implement WG14 N3369 and N3469 (_Countof)
C2y
zyn0217 wrote:
The commit message is mysteriously gone when merging with the github app 🥲
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132061
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commi
AlexVlx wrote:
> > This change adds two semi-magical builtins for AMDGPU:
> > ```
> > * `__builtin_amdgcn_processor_is`, which is similar in observable behaviour
> > with `__builtin_cpu_is`, except that it is never "evaluated" at run time;
> >
> > * `__builtin_amdgcn_is_invocable`, which is beh
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov (Endilll)
Changes
Otherwise Windows users have troubles with lexer tests that use emojis.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131816.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/www/make_cxx_dr_statu
Sirraide wrote:
Hmm, not sure what is going on here; I’ll revert this for now and investigate.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132348
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-
https://github.com/mustartt created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133617
https://reviews.llvm.org/D124060
>From d10bfa59ba468d1f3159aad66b532e4be0e56831 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Henry Jiang
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 00:23:10 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Enable indiviual crbits trackin
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133870
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
JonPsson1 wrote:
Thanks to @boomanaiden154 for pointing out that I need to pass
-DCOMPILER_RT_BUILD_BUILTINS=ON to cmake - the tests now builds and runs.
The test for half->double conversions added, with the 64-bit hex values taken
from the compiler-rt conversion function results (should be co
AaronBallman wrote:
> > Hi, I tried to explain everything here:
>
> Thanks, I missed that! For RFCs it's preferable to use
> [Discourse](https://discourse.llvm.org/c/clang/clang-tidy/71), as there is a
> lot less traffic and can more easily catch the eyes of relevant people. I did
> not see m
Juan Manuel Martinez =?utf-8?q?Caama=C3=B1o?= ,
Juan Manuel Martinez =?utf-8?q?Caama=C3=B1o?= ,
Juan Manuel Martinez =?utf-8?q?Caama=C3=B1o?= ,
Juan Manuel Martinez =?utf-8?q?Caama=C3=B1o?= ,
Juan Manuel Martinez =?utf-8?q?Caama=C3=B1o?= ,
Juan Manuel Martinez =?utf-8?q?Caama=C3=B1o?= ,
Juan Manuel
https://github.com/junlarsen edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133870
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Mr-Anyone created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134486
It appears that Clang currently mangles names incorrectly when handling lambda
expressions in constraint (`requires`) clauses.
The issue likely stems from `mangleLocalName` being used, whereas
`mangleNested
philnik777 wrote:
@DKLoehr @AaronBallman Did you see the revert?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133265
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/frasercrmck updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134218
>From 583261a0d1fc57ddb8ae964cbaf4f044c39d9bf2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fraser Cormack
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 09:29:28 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [libclc] Move fmin & fmax to CLC library
This is an alt
jyknight wrote:
Wait, _on by default_?
Perhaps I'm out of line with current thinking here, but IMO, on-by-default
should only diagnose things which are likely to be harmful -- NOT just a style
or inefficiency issue, which seems to be all this is diagnosing. That LLVM's
style conflicts with it
https://github.com/huixie90 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121199
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1692,6 +1692,19 @@
PassBuilder::buildFatLTODefaultPipeline(OptimizationLevel Level, bool ThinLTO,
if (ThinLTO && PGOOpt && PGOOpt->Action == PGOOptions::SampleUse)
MPM.addPass(buildThinLTODefaultPipeline(Level, /*ImportSummary=*/nullptr));
else {
+// ModuleSimp
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+// RUN %clang_cc1 %s -O0 -emit-llvm -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown \
+// RUN -verify -complex-range=promoted -o - | FileCheck %s
+
+// RUN %clang_cc1 %s -O0 -emit-llvm -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown \
+// RUN -verify=nopromotion -complex-range=promoted -target-fe
@@ -332,19 +380,44 @@ void UseEmplaceCheck::check(const
MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
}();
assert(Call && "No call matched");
- assert((CtorCall || MakeCall) && "No push_back parameter matched");
+ assert((CtorCall || MakeCall || AggInitCall) &&
+ "No push
Author: CHANDRA GHALE
Date: 2025-03-21T14:19:08+05:30
New Revision: 6da8f5661961416c704061a9d401ea6ae480cbc1
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6da8f5661961416c704061a9d401ea6ae480cbc1
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6da8f5661961416c704061a9d401ea6ae480cbc1.diff
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -x hlsl -triple
dxil-pc-shadermodel6.2-library %s -fnative-half-type -emit-llvm -O1 -o - |
FileCheck %s
+
+
+// CHECK-LABEL: define noundef nofpclass(nan inf) <4 x float>
@_Z12dstWithFloatDv4_fS_(
+// CHECK-SAME: <4
olologin wrote:
>it sounds like the goal is somewhat less about clang-tidy checks and more
>about running code transformations more easily.
Original goal was to have just clang-tidy checks. We use it on our CI to guard
main branch from people accidentally merging prohibited stuff. If CI informs
Author: Younan Zhang
Date: 2025-03-24T16:46:48+08:00
New Revision: 38d71c9bdcf6b10c6fe02d5bd74fc8e6efb50a4d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/38d71c9bdcf6b10c6fe02d5bd74fc8e6efb50a4d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/38d71c9bdcf6b10c6fe02d5bd74fc8e6efb50a4d.diff
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (metkarpoonam)
Changes
Implement dst algorithm in the hlsl_intrinsics.h and added test cases for HLSL
codegen and sema
fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/99108
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/
@@ -223,6 +223,13 @@ endif()
# This can be used to detect whether we're in the runtimes build.
set(LLVM_RUNTIMES_BUILD ON)
+if (LLVM_ENABLE_PER_TARGET_RUNTIME_DIR AND UNIX AND ${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME}
MATCHES "AIX")
+ # Set LLVM_ENABLE_PER_TARGET_RUNTIME_DIR=OFF as AIX doesn't s
@@ -127,6 +136,8 @@ struct MissingFeatures {
static bool ternaryOp() { return false; }
static bool tryOp() { return false; }
static bool zextOp() { return false; }
+ static bool opPtrStride() { return false; }
+ static bool opPtrDiff() { return false; }
https://github.com/kadircet approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131591
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/maryammo commented:
Can we have a test where it shows with this PR, the backend computeFSAdditions
can override the CRBits passed by frontend?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133617
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits
https://github.com/naveen-seth created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133462
When using -fmodule-file== with incorrect inputs, the
compiler crashes in two scenarios:
1. A module is mapped to the right BMI file but one of its transitively
exported module dependencies is also mapped
@@ -3239,61 +3162,11 @@ bool Sema::SubstTypeConstraint(
TC->getTemplateArgsAsWritten();
if (!EvaluateConstraints) {
-bool ShouldExpandExplicitTemplateArgs =
-TemplArgInfo && ArgumentPackSubstitutionIndex != -1 &&
-llvm::any_of(TemplArgInfo->argument
@@ -1655,6 +1667,10 @@ bool RISCVAsmParser::matchAndEmitInstruction(SMLoc
IDLoc, unsigned &Opcode,
return generateImmOutOfRangeError(Operands, ErrorInfo, 1, (1 << 5));
case Match_InvalidUImm5GE6Plus1:
return generateImmOutOfRangeError(Operands, ErrorInfo, 6, (1 << 5)
https://github.com/Sirraide commented:
I think splitting this up by target is a good idea.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132252
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-comm
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-m68k-linux-cross`
running on `suse-gary-m68k-cross` while building `clang` at step 5 "ninja check
1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/27/builds/8021
Here is the relevant piece o
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t && mkdir -p %t
+// RUN: clang-doc --format=md --doxygen --output=%t --executor=standalone %s
+// RUN: clang-doc --format=html --doxygen --output=%t --executor=standalone %s
+// RUN: FileCheck %s < %t/GlobalNamespace/MyClass.md
--check-prefix=MD
@@ -32,6 +32,26 @@ enum E2 : S::I { e };
#endif
} // namespace cwg2516
+namespace cwg2517 { // cwg2517: 21
+#if __cplusplus >= 202302L
imdj wrote:
Shouldn't it follow the status mentioned here
https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2517.html? or it there a m
Mateusz =?utf-8?q?Mikuła?= ,
Mateusz =?utf-8?q?Mikuła?= ,
Mateusz =?utf-8?q?Mikuła?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -847,7 +847,11 @@ void llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(raw_ostream &OS, int
Depth) {
const char *name = strrchr(dlinfo.dli_fname, '/');
if (!name)
+#ifdef __
@@ -436,9 +436,9 @@ class StdLibraryFunctionsChecker
llvm::raw_ostream &Out) const override;
ValueConstraintPtr negate() const override {
- NotNullBufferConstraint Tmp(*this);
+ BufferNullnessConstraint Tmp(*this);
Tmp.Cannot
pratlucas wrote:
I see this change re-landed yesterday but we continue to see failures related
to the extra `-unknown` component in our downstream testing of
[arm/arm-toolchain](https://github.com/arm/arm-toolchain), which are similar to
what was described in the comment above:
```
arm-softwar
DanielCChen wrote:
> May I ask not to merge this yet? I have a question above, but I will not be
> at work until next Thursday to discuss this in a timely manner.
@vzakhari Sure, I will wait until you come back.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134362
___
zeule wrote:
> IMO, a boolean option, e.g. `AllowBreakBeforeQPropertyKeyword` should
> suffice.
I don't like to hardcode neither the macro name nor the keywords, which depend
on Qt version. Implementation would not differ save for the source we fetch
keywords from.
https://github.com/llvm/
@@ -749,13 +752,8 @@ genHTML(const EnumInfo &I, const ClangDocContext &CDCtx) {
Out.emplace_back(std::move(Table));
- if (I.DefLoc) {
-if (!CDCtx.RepositoryUrl)
- Out.emplace_back(writeFileDefinition(*I.DefLoc));
-else
- Out.emplace_back(
- write
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ class CollectUnexpandedParameterPacksVisitor
unsigned DepthLimit = (unsigned)-1;
#ifndef NDEBUG
-bool ContainsIntermediatePacks = false;
+ bool ContainsIntermediatePacks = false;
cor3ntin wrote:
We gain nothing by hiding that behind N
https://github.com/Andrewyuan34 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127377
>From fb2a4067517c1378ea6801ccd4a90207f607715f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrewyuan34
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 22:59:06 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] Fix false negative modernize-use-ranges when
u
justincady wrote:
Coverage report before:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/80bb84a0-a76e-4f45-aca8-fd53378caa73";
/>
Coverage report after:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/987ae207-0eaf-4f33-aeb0-387c27cb382f";
/>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133463
https://github.com/dmpolukhin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132214
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2234,6 +2234,101 @@ enum class CXXNewInitializationStyle {
Braces
};
+enum class TypeAwareAllocationMode : unsigned { No, Yes };
+inline bool isTypeAwareAllocation(TypeAwareAllocationMode Mode) {
+ return Mode == TypeAwareAllocationMode::Yes;
+}
+inline TypeAwareAllocat
topperc wrote:
> > SiFive's AME proposal locates in OP-V/OP-VE category
>
> Yes, this is a good point. I do think we should also remove other vendor
> instruction sets which abused the standard op fields.
The RISC-V specification does not take a hard stance on non-conforming
extensions. It sh
https://github.com/jroelofs approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132727
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/bcardosolopes approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132266
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -994,6 +992,127 @@ mlir::LogicalResult
CIRToLLVMUnaryOpLowering::matchAndRewrite(
<< elementType;
}
+mlir::LLVM::IntegerOverflowFlags
+CIRToLLVMBinOpLowering::getIntOverflowFlag(cir::BinOp op) const {
+ if (op.getNoUnsignedWrap())
+return mlir:
https://github.com/yonghong-song closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133666
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Yingwei Zheng
Date: 2025-04-03T18:03:42+08:00
New Revision: 61907ebd764afe75aa7134627f41827e6893d6d0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/61907ebd764afe75aa7134627f41827e6893d6d0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/61907ebd764afe75aa7134627f41827e6893d6d0.diff
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `sanitizer-aarch64-linux`
running on `sanitizer-buildbot7` while building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/51/builds/13779
Here is the relevant piece of the
jrtc27 wrote:
Is there a reason why these aren't lowercase like the rest?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132481
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Mohamed Emad
Date: 2025-03-28T16:45:09-07:00
New Revision: 515d1ae679ea25687423be37abec74565d755921
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/515d1ae679ea25687423be37abec74565d755921
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/515d1ae679ea25687423be37abec74565d755921.diff
https://github.com/Un1q32 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124651
>From d4e97c4113086c3d2dfa3bf6e9ecfee377f8c4b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Un1q32
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 18:00:34 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang] Link libgcc_s.1.dylib when building for macOS
10.5 and olde
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Alexandros Lamprineas (labrinea)
Changes
Removes attr-target-version.c which doesn't have a clear purpose.
Introduces AArch64/fmv-detection.c to check detection bitmasks.
Adds coverage in AArch64/fmv-resolver-emission.c
---
Patch is 87.47
mizvekov wrote:
@fmayer this patch touches nowhere near where those backtraces indicate.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130182 is a far more likely culprit.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132748
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-co
=?utf-8?q?Théo?= De Magalhaes ,
=?utf-8?q?Théo?= De Magalhaes ,
=?utf-8?q?Théo?= De Magalhaes ,
=?utf-8?q?Théo?= De Magalhaes ,
=?utf-8?q?Théo?= De Magalhaes ,
=?utf-8?q?Théo?= De Magalhaes ,
=?utf-8?q?Théo?= De Magalhaes ,
=?utf-8?q?Théo?= De Magalhaes
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
mizvekov wrote:
https://github.com/brad0 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133661
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `polly-x86_64-linux-shared`
running on `polly-x86_64-gce2` while building `clang` at step 5 "build".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/97/builds/5523
Here is the relevant piece of the bui
https://github.com/Artem-B closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132883
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -871,13 +871,81 @@ struct FormatStyle {
/// void f() { bar(); }
/// \endcode
SFS_All,
+/// Configure merge behavior using AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLineOptions
+SFS_Custom,
};
/// Dependent on the value, ``int f() { return 0; }`` can be put on
mizvekov wrote:
@thurstond Well can you provide a more recent buildbot failure link where
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130182 is not on the list of possible
culpirits? Because the link @fmayer provided for sure included it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132748
https://github.com/HazardyKnusperkeks approved this pull request.
But why does this fix it?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134472
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-com
Mateusz =?utf-8?q?Mikuła?= ,
Mateusz =?utf-8?q?Mikuła?= ,
Mateusz =?utf-8?q?Mikuła?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -847,7 +847,11 @@ void llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(raw_ostream &OS, int
Depth) {
const char *name = strrchr(dlinfo.dli_fname, '/');
if (!name)
+#ifdef __
https://github.com/YutongZhuu ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133653
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/YutongZhuu edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133653
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Mateusz =?utf-8?q?Mikuła?= ,
Mateusz =?utf-8?q?Mikuła?= ,
Mateusz =?utf-8?q?Mikuła?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -847,7 +847,11 @@ void llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(raw_ostream &OS, int
Depth) {
const char *name = strrchr(dlinfo.dli_fname, '/');
if (!name)
+#ifdef __
Mateusz =?utf-8?q?Mikuła?= ,
Mateusz =?utf-8?q?Mikuła?= ,
Mateusz =?utf-8?q?Mikuła?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/jeremyd2019 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134494
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.o
https://github.com/roadswitcher closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128438
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
roadswitcher wrote:
Closing on assumption there's a More Preferred way to build this with
gcc-toolset.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128438
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list
https://github.com/owenca demilestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134472
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -847,7 +847,11 @@ void llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(raw_ostream &OS, int
Depth) {
const char *name = strrchr(dlinfo.dli_fname, '/');
if (!name)
+#ifdef __CYGWIN__
+ OS << format(" %-*s", width, &dlinfo.dli_fname);
mati865 wrote:
Good point, som
https://github.com/mati865 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134494
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
owenca wrote:
See #134514
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134472
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/owenca closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134473
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Owen Pan
Date: 2025-04-05T17:03:55-07:00
New Revision: aaaeb86acea77c5bcdb60011ce6aaaf4ebca4081
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/aaaeb86acea77c5bcdb60011ce6aaaf4ebca4081
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/aaaeb86acea77c5bcdb60011ce6aaaf4ebca4081.diff
LOG:
brad0 wrote:
@MaskRay Another thing I wanted to ask about was there were some tests I
removed with nacl in the name that used nacl triples as well as
rodata-section.s. I am not sure if any of them are still relevant outside of a
nacl environment. Should they be renamed and use a different trip
https://github.com/DanielCChen created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134520
`addArchSpecificRPath` shoudl immediately return for AIX as AIX doesn't support
`rpath` option.
`getArchSpecificLibPaths` also needs to get the triple without the OS version
on AIX.
>From a3583c59f7797a40a
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Daniel Chen (DanielCChen)
Changes
`addArchSpecificRPath` shoudl immediately return for AIX as AIX doesn't support
`rpath` option.
`getArchSpecificLibPaths` also needs to get the triple without the OS version
on AIX.
---
Full diff: https:
https://github.com/DanielCChen edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134520
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/simpal01 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134099
>From 7f6302053575732f633c69bbf55f2624da1e8bf4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simi Pallipurath
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 12:35:16 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Refine multilib selection to handle alignment based on
a
Author: Yaxun (Sam) Liu
Date: 2025-04-02T18:28:56-04:00
New Revision: dedb632b833f14ef28c6f8a7f5e8983c1be60fa9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dedb632b833f14ef28c6f8a7f5e8983c1be60fa9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dedb632b833f14ef28c6f8a7f5e8983c1be60fa9.dif
https://github.com/spall updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131666
>From 4d4541232fb8ada1a4a17701919809a2a727d52d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sarah Spall
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 12:01:11 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] remove Macros implementing overloads for min and max.
Implement
Mateusz =?utf-8?q?Mikuła?= ,
Mateusz =?utf-8?q?Mikuła?= ,
Mateusz =?utf-8?q?Mikuła?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/jeremyd2019 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134494
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.o
Author: Brad Smith
Date: 2025-03-21T02:13:33-04:00
New Revision: 910f7f45f27d1f3cfad779669d0e0f15ff5b9686
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/910f7f45f27d1f3cfad779669d0e0f15ff5b9686
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/910f7f45f27d1f3cfad779669d0e0f15ff5b9686.diff
LO
https://github.com/jadhbeika updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128742
>From fa3dd1423e4bf2209feb9713f1833e653ec43a74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jad Hbeika
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 12:53:11 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Clang] [OpenMP] Support NOWAIT with optional argument
---
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133201
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
601 - 700 of 734 matches
Mail list logo
