firewave wrote:

> I am seeing this with an enum type which might be valid, working code but 
> have not looked into it yet.

The warnings in question were correct. It exposed a behavior change introduced 
by fixing `performance-enum-size`.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127720
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to