https://github.com/AmrDeveloper updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121656
>From 4cd48886384570e0e5bb0b712f4fd45f8decd27e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: AmrDeveloper
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2025 17:36:05 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang][ASTMatcher] Add a matcher for the name of a
Depe
https://github.com/owenca updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121681
>From 14e26d9bb27724705e51fc134a4f3df2a09807e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Pan
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:42:38 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format] Add LT_RequiresExpression and
LT_SimpleRequirement
The
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121679
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cor3ntin wrote:
> To do that, we need to downgrade CWG from being available in Clang 3.2 to
> "partial", and merge in at least the test that doesn't pass. Maybe we should
> do that anyway.
I'd say so, yes
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121654
___
@@ -100,7 +103,7 @@ Parser::DeclGroupPtrTy
Parser::ParseNamespace(DeclaratorContext Context,
} while (MoreToParse);
};
- ReadAttributes();
+ ReadAttributes(/*TrailingAttrs*/ false);
cor3ntin wrote:
Sorry for the misunderstanding. `CheckProhibitedCXX1
=?utf-8?q?André?= Brand
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/thebrandre updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121039
>From 974fc45ff52e15d42566f5a36c07c8c3c17a920d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Andr=C3=A9=20Brand?=
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2025 14:48:40 +0100
Subject: [
=?utf-8?q?André?= Brand
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/thebrandre edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121039
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/aalhwc updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121332
>From f247c1ab9fa89ca09476ed0a398a4c4385e75193 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: aalhwc
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 05:03:59 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang] Add GCC's __builtin_stack_address() to Clang
(#82632).
Thi
@@ -922,6 +922,49 @@ namespace cwg155 { // cwg155: dup 632
// expected-warning@-1 {{braces around scalar initializer}}
}
+namespace cwg156 { // cwg156: partial
+namespace ex1 {
+struct A {
+ operator int();
+} a;
+void foo() {
+ typedef int T;
+ a.operator T(); // T is fo
https://github.com/cor3ntin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121654
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cor3ntin commented:
I wonder if we just mark that as superseded and/or N/A.
The original requirements that lookup must find "the same thing" everywhere is
gone so in effect we will never support the behavior that this issue is
describing
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/
@@ -922,6 +922,49 @@ namespace cwg155 { // cwg155: dup 632
// expected-warning@-1 {{braces around scalar initializer}}
}
+namespace cwg156 { // cwg156: partial
+namespace ex1 {
+struct A {
+ operator int();
+} a;
+void foo() {
+ typedef int T;
+ a.operator T(); // T is fo
@@ -100,7 +103,7 @@ Parser::DeclGroupPtrTy
Parser::ParseNamespace(DeclaratorContext Context,
} while (MoreToParse);
};
- ReadAttributes();
+ ReadAttributes(/*TrailingAttrs*/ false);
cor3ntin wrote:
I would just call `CheckProhibitedCXX11Attribute` he
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ Parser::DeclGroupPtrTy
Parser::ParseNamespace(DeclaratorContext Context,
ParsedAttributes attrs(AttrFactory);
- auto ReadAttributes = [&] {
+ auto ReadAttributes = [&](bool TrailingAttrs) {
cor3ntin wrote:
Pre-existing, but why is this
Endilll wrote:
> I wonder if we just mark that as superseded and/or N/A.
To do that, we need to downgrade CWG from being available in Clang 3.2 to
"partial", and merge in at least the test that doesn't pass. Maybe we should do
that anyway.
> The original requirements that lookup must find
@@ -2235,6 +2235,21 @@ TEST_P(ASTMatchersTest,
ArgumentCountIs_CXXConstructExpr) {
Constructor1Arg));
}
+TEST_P(ASTMatchersTest, hasDependentName_DependentScopeDeclRefExpr) {
+ if (!GetParam().isCXX() || GetParam().hasDelayedTemplateParsing()) {
+// FIXM
@@ -2235,6 +2235,21 @@ TEST_P(ASTMatchersTest,
ArgumentCountIs_CXXConstructExpr) {
Constructor1Arg));
}
+TEST_P(ASTMatchersTest, hasDependentName_DependentScopeDeclRefExpr) {
AmrDeveloper wrote:
Done
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pul
chandlerc wrote:
@dyung -- Ok, my latest attempt to work around these MSVC issues is now pushed
to this PR. It also contains a commit of specifically debugging hacks to try
and extract more information from any failure here. If you could try doing
another build with the latest commit
([2ec750
101 - 118 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
