Endilll wrote: > I wonder if we just mark that as superseded and/or N/A.
To do that, we need to downgrade CWG1111 from being available in Clang 3.2 to "partial", and merge in at least the test that doesn't pass. Maybe we should do that anyway. > The original requirements that lookup must find "the same thing" everywhere > is gone so in effect we will never support the behavior that this issue is > describing Note that it's resolved as NAD, so it's totally fine that the behavior described in the issue is not what we test. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121654 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
