================
@@ -922,6 +922,49 @@ namespace cwg155 { // cwg155: dup 632
// expected-warning@-1 {{braces around scalar initializer}}
}
+namespace cwg156 { // cwg156: partial
+namespace ex1 {
+struct A {
+ operator int();
+} a;
+void foo() {
+ typedef int T;
+ a.operator T(); // T is found using unqualified lookup
+ // after qualified lookup in A fails.
+}
+} // namespace ex1
+
+namespace ex2 {
+struct A {
+ typedef int T;
+ operator T();
+};
+struct B : A {
+ operator T();
+} b;
+void foo() {
+ b.A::operator T(); // FIXME: qualified lookup should find T in A.
+ // expected-error@-1 {{unknown type name 'T'}}
----------------
cor3ntin wrote:
This seems to be #28181
Do we want to take a crack at it?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121654
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
