@@ -144,8 +144,13 @@ getQualification(ASTContext &Context, const DeclContext
*DestContext,
// since we stored inner-most parent first.
std::string Result;
llvm::raw_string_ostream OS(Result);
- for (const auto *Parent : llvm::reverse(Parents))
+ for (const auto *Parent
@@ -407,10 +431,21 @@ class DefineOutline : public Tweak {
return !SameFile;
}
-// Bail out in templated classes, as it is hard to spell the class name,
-// i.e if the template parameter is unnamed.
-if (MD->getParent()->isTemplated())
- return false
https://github.com/ckandeler updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95235
>From de740c00c4cc3a9f2e8aff14cf8ebd880a240e58 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christian Kandeler
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 16:35:46 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clangd] Let DefineOutline tweak handle member functions
https://github.com/yronglin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106071
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
yronglin wrote:
Thanks for the review!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106071
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -5312,6 +5314,147 @@ bool Compiler::VisitComplexUnaryOperator(const
UnaryOperator *E) {
return true;
}
+template
+bool Compiler::VisitVectorUnaryOperator(const UnaryOperator *E) {
+ const Expr *SubExpr = E->getSubExpr();
+ assert(SubExpr->getType()->isVectorType());
+
@@ -5567,19 +5568,35 @@ ExprResult Sema::BuildCXXDefaultInitExpr(SourceLocation
Loc, FieldDecl *Field) {
ImmediateCallVisitor V(getASTContext());
if (!NestedDefaultChecking)
V.TraverseDecl(Field);
- if (V.HasImmediateCalls) {
+
+ // CWG1815
+ // Support lifetime ext
https://github.com/necto updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106048
>From 7d5ae515f7727de98e7e8ce2f259e579a1f24463 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arseniy Zaostrovnykh
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 17:31:11 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [analyzer] Report violations of the "returns_nonnull"
@@ -5312,6 +5314,147 @@ bool Compiler::VisitComplexUnaryOperator(const
UnaryOperator *E) {
return true;
}
+template
+bool Compiler::VisitVectorUnaryOperator(const UnaryOperator *E) {
+ const Expr *SubExpr = E->getSubExpr();
+ assert(SubExpr->getType()->isVectorType());
+
@@ -10,3 +12,42 @@ void block_arity_mismatch() {
void(^b)() = ^(int a, int b) { };
b(1); // no-crash expected-warning {{Block taking 2 arguments is called
with fewer (1)}}
}
+
+int *nonnull_return_annotation_indirect() __attribute__((returns_nonnull));
+int *nonnull_retur
@@ -5567,19 +5568,35 @@ ExprResult Sema::BuildCXXDefaultInitExpr(SourceLocation
Loc, FieldDecl *Field) {
ImmediateCallVisitor V(getASTContext());
if (!NestedDefaultChecking)
V.TraverseDecl(Field);
- if (V.HasImmediateCalls) {
+
+ // CWG1815
+ // Support lifetime ext
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -Wno-uninitialized -std=c++14
-fsyntax-only -verify
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -triple x86_64-linux-gnu
-fexperimental-new-constant-interpreter -Wno-uninitialized -std=c++14
-fsyntax-only -verify
+
+// expected-no-dia
https://github.com/usx95 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105817
>From 77003063912f691d246c4f94dd7a952ceace9268 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Utkarsh Saxena
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 11:57:40 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang] Compiler builtin for deduping a list of types
---
.
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -Wno-uninitialized -std=c++14
-fsyntax-only -verify
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -triple x86_64-linux-gnu
-fexperimental-new-constant-interpreter -Wno-uninitialized -std=c++14
-fsyntax-only -verify
+
+// expected-no-dia
@@ -177,6 +177,26 @@ static bool isLanguageDefinedBuiltin(const SourceManager
&SourceMgr,
return false;
}
+static bool isReservedAttrName(Preprocessor &PP, IdentifierInfo *II) {
+ const LangOptions &Lang = PP.getLangOpts();
+ const StringRef Name = II->getName();
+
+ if
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -Wno-uninitialized -std=c++14
-fsyntax-only -verify
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -triple x86_64-linux-gnu
-fexperimental-new-constant-interpreter -Wno-uninitialized -std=c++14
-fsyntax-only -verify
+
+// expected-no-dia
@@ -177,6 +177,26 @@ static bool isLanguageDefinedBuiltin(const SourceManager
&SourceMgr,
return false;
}
+static bool isReservedAttrName(Preprocessor &PP, IdentifierInfo *II) {
+ const LangOptions &Lang = PP.getLangOpts();
+ const StringRef Name = II->getName();
+
+ if
@@ -177,6 +177,26 @@ static bool isLanguageDefinedBuiltin(const SourceManager
&SourceMgr,
return false;
}
+static bool isReservedAttrName(Preprocessor &PP, IdentifierInfo *II) {
a-tarasyuk wrote:
@cor3ntin The
[Attr.td](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-proje
@@ -177,6 +177,26 @@ static bool isLanguageDefinedBuiltin(const SourceManager
&SourceMgr,
return false;
}
+static bool isReservedAttrName(Preprocessor &PP, IdentifierInfo *II) {
AaronBallman wrote:
> Does C has similar restrictions?
No, C has no such rest
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89934
>From 9eb7a15b385bff343969382c911d744ae954b7f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 20:54:58 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang][Sema] Revisit the lambda within a type alias
template
https://github.com/yronglin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106071
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: yronglin
Date: 2024-08-26T22:23:07+08:00
New Revision: d9e728601938f7d587ac580d32f042fa74041864
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d9e728601938f7d587ac580d32f042fa74041864
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d9e728601938f7d587ac580d32f042fa74041864.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89934
>From 9eb7a15b385bff343969382c911d744ae954b7f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 20:54:58 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang][Sema] Revisit the lambda within a type alias
template
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89934
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/pskrgag created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106081
PR refactors `MallocChecker` to not violate invariant of `BindExpr`, which
should be called only during `evalCall` to avoid conflicts.
To achieve this, most of `postCall` logic was moved to `evalCall` with addi
https://github.com/pskrgag converted_to_draft
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106081
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Pavel Skripkin (pskrgag)
Changes
PR refactors `MallocChecker` to not violate invariant of `BindExpr`, which
should be called only during `evalCall` to avoid conflicts.
To achieve this, most of
pskrgag wrote:
So I just wanted to share progress on this. I have only 2 failing tests now:
```
Clang :: Analysis/NewDelete+MismatchedDeallocator_intersections.cpp
Clang :: Analysis/NewDelete-intersections.m
```
The problem with those is that now CSA reports read of undefined value obtained
https://github.com/pskrgag edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106081
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+//===--- SuspiciousPointerArithmeticsUsingSizeofCheck.cpp - clang-tidy --===//
EugeneZelenko wrote:
Please make same length as closing comment.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106061
___
cfe
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+//===--- SuspiciousPointerArithmeticsUsingSizeofCheck.cpp - clang-tidy --===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+//===--- SuspiciousPointerArithmeticsUsingSizeofCheck.h - clang-tidy -*- C++
-*-===//
EugeneZelenko wrote:
Length.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106061
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-co
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+//===--- SuspiciousPointerArithmeticsUsingSizeofCheck.cpp - clang-tidy --===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106036
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
I would expect these to be controlled by `-Wreserved-identifier` rather than
keyword hiding (these are not keywords), probably in a new group like
`-Wreserved-attribute-identifier`, WDYT?
SourceGraph's backend is currently falling over, so I don't hav
@@ -177,6 +177,26 @@ static bool isLanguageDefinedBuiltin(const SourceManager
&SourceMgr,
return false;
}
+static bool isReservedAttrName(Preprocessor &PP, IdentifierInfo *II) {
AaronBallman wrote:
What should the behavior be with `-nostdlib`? Should these
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,cxx11 -pedantic -std=c++11 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,cxx14 -pedantic -std=c++14 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,cxx17 -pedantic -std=c++17 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,cxx11 -pedantic -std=c++11 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,cxx14 -pedantic -std=c++14 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,cxx17 -pedantic -std=c++17 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,cxx11 -pedantic -std=c++11 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,cxx14 -pedantic -std=c++14 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,cxx17 -pedantic -std=c++17 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
LGTM (for the time being, I don't think this is workable long term)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89934
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/c
https://github.com/cor3ntin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106054
>From 2d3b50688e7b0faea4452860cacc24a596cd685c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Corentin Jabot
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 10:48:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] Evaluate dependent indexes of pack indexing in a
https://github.com/necto updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106048
>From 7d5ae515f7727de98e7e8ce2f259e579a1f24463 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arseniy Zaostrovnykh
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 17:31:11 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [analyzer] Report violations of the "returns_nonnull"
@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
-// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -fblocks -analyzer-checker=core,nullability
-Wno-deprecated-non-prototype -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -fblocks
-analyzer-checker=core,nullability,debug.ExprInspection
-Wno-deprecated-non-prototype -verify %s
---
@@ -10,3 +12,42 @@ void block_arity_mismatch() {
void(^b)() = ^(int a, int b) { };
b(1); // no-crash expected-warning {{Block taking 2 arguments is called
with fewer (1)}}
}
+
+int *nonnull_return_annotation_indirect() __attribute__((returns_nonnull));
+int *nonnull_retur
@@ -692,6 +692,14 @@ void NullabilityChecker::checkPreStmt(const ReturnStmt *S,
NullConstraint Nullness = getNullConstraint(*RetSVal, State);
Nullability RequiredNullability = getNullabilityAnnotation(RequiredRetType);
+ if (const auto *FunDecl = C.getLocationContext()->g
https://github.com/necto edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106048
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/necto updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106048
>From 7d5ae515f7727de98e7e8ce2f259e579a1f24463 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arseniy Zaostrovnykh
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 17:31:11 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [analyzer] Report violations of the "returns_nonnull"
necto wrote:
> Please update the documentation of the affected checkers (in
> clang/docs/analyzer/checkers.rst) to mark that they are no longer limited to
> Objective-C.
Updated in 2d2ab3185a00
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106048
___
cf
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+//===--- SuspiciousPointerArithmeticsUsingSizeofCheck.h - clang-tidy -*- C++
-*-===//
whisperity wrote:
This is not fixable without removing the `-*- C++ -*-` part, but that also
should be there, because emacs users.
https://github.com/llvm/l
https://github.com/pow2clk created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106096
Thread init guards are generated for local static variables when using the
Microsoft CXX ABI. This ABI is also used for HLSL generation, but DXIL doesn't
need the corresponding _Init_thread_header/footer calls
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-directx
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Greg Roth (pow2clk)
Changes
Thread init guards are generated for local static variables when using the
Microsoft CXX ABI. This ABI is also used for HLSL generation, but DXIL doesn't
need the correspond
Author: cor3ntin
Date: 2024-08-26T17:50:32+02:00
New Revision: 5a288b9183ca3b7d2bad2b39670803e0ca195f09
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5a288b9183ca3b7d2bad2b39670803e0ca195f09
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5a288b9183ca3b7d2bad2b39670803e0ca195f09.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/cor3ntin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106054
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
MaxEW707 wrote:
> LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `sanitizer-x86_64-linux`
> running on `sanitizer-buildbot1` while building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
>
> Full details are available at:
> https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/66/builds/3102
> Here is the relevant pie
https://github.com/whisperity updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106061
>From 0202caa773928bfc395b850f52191ab15afe0eb4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zporky
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 20:40:39 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] Initial pointer arithmetics using sizeof matcher
---
.../bug
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`libc-x86_64-debian-fullbuild-dbg` running on `libc-x86_64-debian-fullbuild`
while building `clang` at step 4 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/179/builds/4976
Here is the re
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ def sync_csv(rows: List[Tuple], from_github:
List[PaperInfo]) -> List[Tuple]:
results.append(gh.for_printing())
continue
elif paper.status != gh.status:
-print(f"We found a CSV row and a Github issue with differen
https://github.com/ldionne requested changes to this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105990
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: Python code formatter, darker found issues in your code. :warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
darker --check --diff -r
1193f7d6487d2d94009f8d8d27da3907136482b9...e9ffeeaf7a0bf70c58a04315e451ba4553765586
.gith
https://github.com/damyanp approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106096
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.0-compute -emit-llvm -o -
-disable-llvm-passes %s | FileCheck %s
+
+// Verify that no per variable _Init_thread instructions are emitted for
non-trivial static locals
+// These would normally be emitted by the Mic
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.0-compute -emit-llvm -o -
-disable-llvm-passes %s | FileCheck %s
+
+// Verify that no per variable _Init_thread instructions are emitted for
non-trivial static locals
+// These would normally be emitted by the Mic
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ def sync_csv(rows: List[Tuple], from_github:
List[PaperInfo]) -> List[Tuple]:
results.append(gh.for_printing())
continue
elif paper.status != gh.status:
-print(f"We found a CSV row and a Github issue with differen
negril wrote:
> This was suggested in #91856 and the suggestion there was that we need to
> split it up per sub-project which is something @e-kwsm has been doing:
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pulls/e-kwsm so I don't think this one
> is needed.
That PR is 3 months old? What are the o
boomanaiden154 wrote:
> That PR is 3 months old? What are the odds or the timeline of it getting
> merged?
Probably whenever the author gets back to reviewers. There might be a couple
rounds of review before things get pushed through, but patches for two
subprojects have landed already.
The
dwblaikie wrote:
What static analysis tool flagged this? Any idea why this particular null
dereference, when LLVM/Clang have loads of assumed-non-null pointers that are
dereferenced in a great many places?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105556
___
negril wrote:
> > That PR is 3 months old? What are the odds or the timeline of it getting
> > merged?
>
> Probably whenever the author gets back to reviewers. There might be a couple
> rounds of review before things get pushed through, but patches for two
> subprojects have landed already.
>
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ def sync_csv(rows: List[Tuple], from_github:
List[PaperInfo]) -> List[Tuple]:
results.append(gh.for_printing())
continue
elif paper.status != gh.status:
-print(f"We found a CSV row and a Github issue with differen
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+import argparse
pogo59 wrote:
There is a lit substitution `%python` and I see a fair number of these in the
lit tests. Some use inline python scripts, some have separate scripts, and a
number of them have the python script directly in the test
https://github.com/thesamesam edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105990
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/pow2clk commented:
Thanks @AmrDeveloper ! Really appreciate your initiative to take this on!
I think it might be helpful to use this excellent documentation resource
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/llvm/docs/CommandGuide/FileCheck.rst#filecheck-string-substitut
@@ -15,70 +15,70 @@
// DXIL_NATIVE_HALF: define noundef half @
// SPIR_NATIVE_HALF: define spir_func noundef half @
-// DXIL_NATIVE_HALF: %hlsl.frac = call half @llvm.dx.frac.f16(
-// SPIR_NATIVE_HALF: %hlsl.frac = call half @llvm.spv.frac.f16(
+// DXIL_NATIVE_HALF: %hlsl.frac
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ void main(unsigned GI : SV_GroupIndex) {}
//CHECK-NEXT: entry:
//CHECK-NEXT: call void @"?call_me_first@@YAXXZ"()
//CHECK-NEXT: call void @"?then_call_me@@YAXXZ"()
-//CHECK-NEXT: %0 = call i32 @llvm.dx.flattened.thread.id.in.group()
+//CHECK-NEXT: %0 =
https://github.com/pow2clk edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105930
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
kimgr wrote:
> > Is there an out-of-tree scenario where CLANG_RESOURCE_DIR needs to be
> > replaced with something else at runtime, i.e. a real use-case for the
> > optional CustomResourceDir optional argument I removed?
>
> @kimgr I have also looked for this and I haven't found an use-case wh
kimgr wrote:
> > Do we need anything more to make progress with this PR?
>
> @kimgr Do you have committer permission? Would you like some help to get this
> merged?
Oh, no, I don't, I would need someone to merge this for me. It's still pretty
early in the v.20 cycle, right, so maybe this is a
https://github.com/llvm-beanz closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102227
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/yshui closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99514
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
yshui wrote:
@HighCommander4 thanks for looking into this! I think this can be closed, right?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99514
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-co
@@ -125,6 +137,25 @@ class TypeDescriptor {
return 1 << (TypeInfo >> 1);
}
+ const char *getBitIntBitCountPointer() const {
+DCHECK(isBitIntTy());
+DCHECK(isSignedBitIntTy());
+// Scan Name for zero and return the next address
+const char *p = getTypeNam
https://github.com/earnol edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96240
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/earnol edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96240
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-0` while building
`clang` at step 7 "Add check check-offload".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/30/builds/4798
Here is the relevan
https://github.com/AlexMaclean updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97762
>From 2dc91ada9078e5c7344e74d5b549e896056f89ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex MacLean
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 17:06:56 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [ValueTracking] use KnownBits to compute fpclass from
bitc
tuliom wrote:
Agreed. Let me merge this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103388
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -5805,6 +5805,37 @@ void computeKnownFPClass(const Value *V, const APInt
&DemandedElts,
break;
}
+ case Instruction::BitCast: {
+const Value *Src;
+if (!match(Op, m_ElementWiseBitCast(m_Value(Src))) ||
+!Src->getType()->isIntOrIntVectorTy())
+ b
Author: Kim Gräsman
Date: 2024-08-26T14:49:56-03:00
New Revision: 924a7d83b4287b3b85dd1ca29d2d3e1f0a10ea68
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/924a7d83b4287b3b85dd1ca29d2d3e1f0a10ea68
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/924a7d83b4287b3b85dd1ca29d2d3e1f0a10ea68.diff
L
https://github.com/tuliom closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103388
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2690,6 +2690,163 @@ entry:
ret double %abs
}
+define float @bitcast_to_float_sign_0(i32 %arg) {
+; CHECK: Function Attrs: mustprogress nofree norecurse nosync nounwind
willreturn memory(none)
+; CHECK-LABEL: define nofpclass(ninf nzero nsub nnorm) float
@bitcast_to_flo
https://github.com/cwarner-8702 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101073
>From 24f52fbfb9117a6498769cebdc7b09ecbd7e019e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Warner
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 11:22:39 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang-tidy] bugprone-implicit-widening ignores unsigned
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 2326a02357c74a1a913a3d572bf789d4d48af7f0
276e48b39864d2c91f97f501d9bc5ed59ca52ced --e
@@ -1154,3 +1156,70 @@ bool SemaHLSL::CheckBuiltinFunctionCall(unsigned
BuiltinID, CallExpr *TheCall) {
}
return false;
}
+
+static bool calculateIsIntangibleType(QualType Ty) {
+ Ty = Ty->getCanonicalTypeUnqualified();
+ if (Ty->isBuiltinType())
+return Ty->isHLSLSp
@@ -5683,6 +5685,14 @@ static bool EvaluateUnaryTypeTrait(Sema &Self, TypeTrait
UTT,
return true;
return false;
}
+ case UTT_IsIntangibleType:
+if (!T->isVoidType() && !T->isIncompleteArrayType())
+ if (Self.RequireCompleteType(TInfo->getTypeLoc().getBe
@@ -1154,3 +1156,70 @@ bool SemaHLSL::CheckBuiltinFunctionCall(unsigned
BuiltinID, CallExpr *TheCall) {
}
return false;
}
+
+static bool calculateIsIntangibleType(QualType Ty) {
+ Ty = Ty->getCanonicalTypeUnqualified();
+ if (Ty->isBuiltinType())
+return Ty->isHLSLSp
@@ -1154,3 +1156,70 @@ bool SemaHLSL::CheckBuiltinFunctionCall(unsigned
BuiltinID, CallExpr *TheCall) {
}
return false;
}
+
+static bool calculateIsIntangibleType(QualType Ty) {
+ Ty = Ty->getCanonicalTypeUnqualified();
+ if (Ty->isBuiltinType())
+return Ty->isHLSLSp
@@ -27,7 +29,7 @@
using namespace clang;
-SemaHLSL::SemaHLSL(Sema &S) : SemaBase(S) {}
+SemaHLSL::SemaHLSL(Sema &S) : SemaBase(S), IsIntangibleTypeCache(8) {}
bogner wrote:
Why initialize the DenseMap with a specific number of buckets here? Why 8?
https://g
@@ -369,24 +393,48 @@ void StackAddrEscapeChecker::checkEndFunction(const
ReturnStmt *RS,
const auto *ReferrerStackSpace =
ReferrerMemSpace->getAs();
+
if (!ReferrerStackSpace)
return false;
- if (ReferredMemSpace->getStackFrame() == Pop
https://github.com/NagyDonat edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105648
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/NagyDonat commented:
I read the commit once and I have a serious question about using
`getOriginRegion` in the invalidation logic (see inline comment for details).
Apart from that, the code LGTM (I might return later with a few additional
comments from a more through review,
@@ -313,7 +321,8 @@ std::optional printReferrer(const MemRegion
*Referrer) {
if (isa(Space))
return "global";
assert(isa(Space));
-return "stack";
+// This case covers top-level and inlined analyses.
+return "caller";
NagyDonat wrote:
301 - 400 of 400 matches
Mail list logo
