[clang] b1b4b6f - [Clang][VE] Add vector load intrinsics

Author: Kazushi (Jam) Marukawa Date: 2022-03-12T09:09:57+09:00 New Revision: b1b4b6f366956a5fd1bfccb3d7c2f7519ed45a28 URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b1b4b6f366956a5fd1bfccb3d7c2f7519ed45a28 DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b1b4b6f366956a5fd1bfccb3d7c2f7519ed45

[PATCH] D121049: [Clang][VE] Add vector load intrinsics

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rGb1b4b6f36695: [Clang][VE] Add vector load intrinsics (authored by kaz7). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D121049/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/

[PATCH] D121175: [clang] Add -Wstart-no-unknown-warning-option/-Wend-no-unknown-warning-option.

MaskRay added a comment. I am also unsure about the usefulness. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D121175/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D121175 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.l

[PATCH] D121426: [VFS] Update uses of getVFSFromYAML to use the new getVFSFromYAMLs API

dexonsmith added a comment. > Includes two test fixes (since chained mappings are no longer allowed) > and adds a new test for multiple overlays. Are we sure no one needs to support chained mappings? Has there been a ~~clang-dev~~ discourse discussion about it already? Just concerned that some

[PATCH] D121177: [modules] Merge equivalent extensions and diagnose ivar redeclarations for extensions loaded from different modules.

vsapsai updated this revision to Diff 414780. vsapsai added a comment. Address comments and make the tests use non-fragile ABI (it's not default everywhere). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D121177/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D12117

[PATCH] D121176: [ASTStructuralEquivalence] Add support for comparing ObjCCategoryDecl.

vsapsai added a comment. In D121176#3372193 , @martong wrote: > Basically, this looks good to me. But my confidence with ObjC is low, so, I'd > like @shafik as well to approve. > Besides, seems like the pre-merge check fails with the new tests on Debian,

[PATCH] D120296: [Attr] Fix a btf_type_tag AST generation bug

yonghong-song added inline comments. Comment at: clang/include/clang/AST/TypeLoc.h:923 + void initializeLocal(ASTContext &Context, SourceLocation loc) {} + + QualType getInnerType() const { return getTypePtr()->getWrappedType(); } aaron.ballman wrote: > Do we a

[PATCH] D121177: [modules] Merge equivalent extensions and diagnose ivar redeclarations for extensions loaded from different modules.

vsapsai marked 6 inline comments as done. vsapsai added a comment. In D121177#3371832 , @ChuanqiXu wrote: > I see it is guaranteed by `lookupInstanceVariable(Identifier)` now. I don't > know much about ObjC. But I feel a little bit strange. Is it possibl

[PATCH] D121410: Have cpu-specific variants set 'tune-cpu' as an optimization hint

pengfei accepted this revision. pengfei added a comment. LGTM. Comment at: clang/lib/Basic/Targets/X86.cpp:1133 +#include "llvm/Support/X86TargetParser.def" +.Default(""); +} clang-format. Comment at: llvm/include/llvm/Support/X86TargetPa

[PATCH] D120639: [RISCV] Pass -mno-relax to assembler when -fno-integrated-as specified

StephenFan added a comment. Ping. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D120639/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D120639 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org

[PATCH] D118948: [MTE] Add -fsanitize=memtag* and friends.

MaskRay added inline comments. Comment at: clang/include/clang/Driver/SanitizerArgs.h:67 + std::string MemtagMode = ""; + Comment at: clang/lib/Driver/SanitizerArgs.cpp:658 +Args.getLastArgValue(options::OPT_fsanitize_memtag_mode_EQ

[PATCH] D121426: [VFS] Update uses of getVFSFromYAML to use the new getVFSFromYAMLs API

bnbarham added a comment. In D121426#3376442 , @dexonsmith wrote: >> Includes two test fixes (since chained mappings are no longer allowed) >> and adds a new test for multiple overlays. > > Are we sure no one needs to support chained mappings? Has there

[PATCH] D121426: [VFS] Update uses of getVFSFromYAML to use the new getVFSFromYAMLs API

bnbarham marked an inline comment as done. bnbarham added inline comments. Comment at: llvm/include/llvm/Support/Error.h:1284 - StringRef getFileName() { return FileName; } + StringRef getFileName() const { return FileName; } dexonsmith wrote: > bnbarham wr

<    1   2