Hello Galina!
On 10/28/20 2:53 AM, Galina Kistanova via llvm-dev wrote:
> llvm-zorg source code has been updated, and now is open for new changes. If
> you have pending patches, please rebase them on top of the llvm-zorg master
> and update your reviews on the Phabricator. I'll start reviewing the
Hello Florian,
Thanks for pointing to the problem. Appreciate this.
It has been fixed and now failed builds reported with the blamelist.
Thanks
Galina
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 5:30 AM Florian Hahn wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 20, 2020, at 03:35, Galina Kistanova via llvm-dev <
> llvm-...@lists.llvm.or
Hello everyone,
The LLVM buildbot is upgraded.
Thanks for your patience and support!
llvm-zorg source code has been updated, and now is open for new changes. If
you have pending patches, please rebase them on top of the llvm-zorg master
and update your reviews on the Phabricator. I'll start revi
Hello Vitaly,
This should be fixed.
Please let me know if you still see the issue.
Thanks
Galina
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 4:45 PM Vitaly Buka wrote:
> It looks fixed. I haven't seen them in recent reports.
>
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 16:32, Vitaly Buka wrote:
>
>> Any news regarding false-n
It looks fixed. I haven't seen them in recent reports.
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 16:32, Vitaly Buka wrote:
> Any news regarding false-negatives?
>
> +Mitch Phillips
>
> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 22:07, Galina Kistanova
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Vitaly.
>> Somebody is looking at this.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oc
Any news regarding false-negatives?
+Mitch Phillips
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 22:07, Galina Kistanova wrote:
> Thanks, Vitaly.
> Somebody is looking at this.
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 9:56 PM Vitaly Buka wrote:
>
>> it's not just staging, this build must be marked as failed
>> http://lab.llv
Thanks, Florian! I will look into this.
Cheers
Galina
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 5:30 AM Florian Hahn wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 20, 2020, at 03:35, Galina Kistanova via llvm-dev <
> llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> We have reached the point when all the bots could be updated to a
> On Oct 20, 2020, at 03:35, Galina Kistanova via llvm-dev
> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> We have reached the point when all the bots could be updated to a newer
> buildbot-worker software.
>
> We should be fine to go with whatever the version is current for the OS on
> your bots.
>
> I
Thanks, Vitaly.
Somebody is looking at this.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 9:56 PM Vitaly Buka wrote:
> it's not just staging, this build must be marked as failed
> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/74/builds/122
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:50, Vitaly Buka wrote:
>
>> There is some issue, at l
it's not just staging, this build must be marked as failed
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/74/builds/122
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:50, Vitaly Buka wrote:
> There is some issue, at least on staging.
> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/89/builds/184 has multiple failed
> stages but marked a
Hello everyone,
We have reached the point when all the bots could be updated to a newer
buildbot-worker software.
We should be fine to go with whatever the version is current for the OS on
your bots.
If you are a bot owner, please feel free to move your bots to the staging,
upgrade the buildbot
There is some issue, at least on staging.
http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/89/builds/184 has multiple failed
stages but marked as SUCCESS
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:43, Vitaly Buka wrote:
> Thanks!
> Done.
>
> On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 12:45, Galina Kistanova
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks everyone for k
Thanks!
Done.
On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 12:45, Galina Kistanova wrote:
> Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging area!
> Much appreciated.
>
> Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the production. It
> has a new AnnotatedCommand now.
>
> Thanks
>
> Galin
Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging area!
Much appreciated.
Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the production. It
has a new AnnotatedCommand now.
Thanks
Galina
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:46 AM Vitaly Buka wrote:
> Ok, I can switch them back
Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was
frequently offline.
On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova wrote:
> Thanks everyone!
>
> I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if
> everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and
Thanks everyone!
I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if everything
is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you move all the
green bots back there.
Thanks
Galina
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka wrote:
> They do on staging.
> http://lab.
I switched sanitizers and two rnk@ bots back to the primary server.
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 22:42, Vitaly Buka wrote:
> They do on staging.
> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-w
They do on staging.
http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server?
If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors.
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Rei
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 10:01 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits
wrote:
> If somebody else could move their AnnotatedCommand bots to the staging area,
> that would be much appreciated.
I moved the libc bots to staging to now.
Thanks,
Siva Chandra
__
FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot annotated
commands:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK for now.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 22:01, Galina Kistanova wrote:
> Thanks, Vitaly!
>
> Let's have them there for at least 24 hours, shall we?
>
We can do that.
>
> Could you move sanitizer-buildbot1, sanitizer-buildbot3,
> sanitizer-buildbot7 as well, please?
>
Done.
> AnnotatedCommand on the staging
Thanks, Vitaly!
Let's have them there for at least 24 hours, shall we?
Could you move sanitizer-buildbot1, sanitizer-buildbot3,
sanitizer-buildbot7 as well, please?
AnnotatedCommand on the staging has been tested functionally and is good.
My only concern at this point is how it would handle a he
Looks like staging AnnotatedCommand fixed step statuses, so we can see
which one is green.
Please let me know when to switch bots back from the staging.
Thank you!
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 21:38, Vitaly Buka wrote:
> Switched all but PPC, I don't have access to them. But they run the same
> script
Switched all but PPC, I don't have access to them. But they run the same
script as sanitizer-x86_64-linux.
http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 19:19, Galina Kistanova wrote:
> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should be
> a fun
We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should be a
functional equivalent of the old one.
We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build bot.
For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the AnnotatedCommand
directly or indirectly moved tempor
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits <
lldb-comm...@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> They are online now - http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer
>
> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot.
> We have changed it to be safe and still do som
Thanks, I see them.
On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 at 16:32, Galina Kistanova wrote:
> They are online now - http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer
>
> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot.
> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it will
>
Hello Andrzej,
Please do not update your bots yet. I will explicitly ask later.
Feel free to move other reliably green bots of yours to the production
buildbot.
Thanks
Galina
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 3:51 AM Andrzej Warzynski
wrote:
> I switched one of our workers to the main Buildbot and ever
I switched one of our workers to the main Buildbot and everything seems
fine #fingers-crossed. I guess that that was a temporary glitch?
We haven't updated our local Buildbot installations - still on 0.8.5.
Should we update?
-Andrzej
On 09/10/2020 00:44, Galina Kistanova wrote:
Hi Paula,
T
Hi Paula,
This error is fine. The buildbot has tested the worker version. 0.8.x
apparently does not have that method.
The error gets handled gracefully on the server side. At least it seems so
so far.
That should not prevent your bot from connecting.
Thanks
Galina
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 2:11 P
Hey Andrzej,
What are you seeing in your buildbot logs? Is it this error?
`twisted.spread.flavors.NoSuchMethod: No such method:
remote_getWorkerInfo`
If so, you might want to try updating your buildbot worker.
I updated llvmlibc's to 2.8.4 and that seemed to solve the connection
problem:
https:/
Hello bot owners,
I see a lot of builders went down and not connecting back to the production
buildbot.
Could you check your bots to make sure they are up and running, please?
And report connectivity issues if any with quotes from the logs directly to
me.
Thanks
Galina
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at
Our Flang-aarch64 buildbots just won't connect to the main Buildbot
master anymore. I switched them to the staging buildbot master instead
and it seems fine for now. Is there anything that we can/should tweak at
our end?
http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/waterfall?tags=flang
-Andrzej
On 08/10/2020
They are online now - http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer
AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot.
We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it will
need more love and care.
Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on
It looks like all sanitizer builder are still offline
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders
On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 00:34, Galina Kistanova via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> The staging buildbot was up and running for 6 days now, and looks good.
>
> Tomorrow a
Hello everyone,
The staging buildbot was up and running for 6 days now, and looks good.
Tomorrow at 12:00 PM PDT we will switch the production buildbot to the new
version.
If you are a bot owner, you do not need to do anything at this point,
unless I'll ask you to help.
The buildbot will go down
Hello everyone,
Starting tomorrow we will be upgrading the staging and production LLVM
build bot.
To make the transition smooth we would not accept any change to zorg from
tomorrow 11:00 AM PDT till the production bot is up and running the new
version. Please feel free to talk to me if you will h
Hello everyone,
The buildbot upgrade is entering the phase when the results to become
visible.
No change is required at this time on any of the builders. The bot owners
could upgrade the buildbot on build computers later, at their convenience,
as this is not on the critical path.
We are going to
38 matches
Mail list logo
