Thanks, Vitaly. Somebody is looking at this.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 9:56 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalyb...@google.com> wrote: > it's not just staging, this build must be marked as failed > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/74/builds/122 > > > On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:50, Vitaly Buka <vitalyb...@google.com> wrote: > >> There is some issue, at least on staging. >> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/89/builds/184 has multiple failed >> stages but marked as SUCCESS >> >> >> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:43, Vitaly Buka <vitalyb...@google.com> wrote: >> >>> Thanks! >>> Done. >>> >>> On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 12:45, Galina Kistanova <gkistan...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging >>>> area! Much appreciated. >>>> >>>> Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the production. >>>> It has a new AnnotatedCommand now. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Galina >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:46 AM Vitaly Buka <vitalyb...@google.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was >>>>> frequently offline. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova <gkistan...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks everyone! >>>>>> >>>>>> I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if >>>>>> everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you >>>>>> move all the green bots back there. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> Galina >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalyb...@google.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> They do on staging. >>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server? >>>>>>> If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner <r...@google.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot >>>>>>>> annotated commands: >>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >>>>>>>> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK >>>>>>>> for now. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova < >>>>>>>> gkistan...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It >>>>>>>>> should be a functional equivalent of the old one. >>>>>>>>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production >>>>>>>>> build bot. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the >>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the >>>>>>>>> staging. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please let me know when that could be arranged. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Galina >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <r...@google.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < >>>>>>>>>> lldb-comm...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> They are online now - >>>>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new >>>>>>>>>>> buildbot. >>>>>>>>>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but >>>>>>>>>>> it will need more love and care. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on >>>>>>>>>>> porting AnnotatedCommand. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I >>>>>>>>>> and another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting >>>>>>>>>> things to >>>>>>>>>> use more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility >>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> test steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> buildbot master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script >>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>> you can run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep >>>>>>>>>> requirements >>>>>>>>>> of the script. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may >>>>>>>>>> need some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
