I switched sanitizers and two rnk@ bots back to the primary server. http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 22:42, Vitaly Buka <vitalyb...@google.com> wrote: > They do on staging. > http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows > http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc > > Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server? > If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors. > > > > On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner <r...@google.com> wrote: > >> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot annotated >> commands: >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK for >> now. >> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova <gkistan...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should >>> be a functional equivalent of the old one. >>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build bot. >>> >>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the >>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging. >>> >>> Please let me know when that could be arranged. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Galina >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <r...@google.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < >>>> lldb-comm...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> They are online now - >>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer >>>>> >>>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. >>>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it >>>>> will need more love and care. >>>>> >>>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting >>>>> AnnotatedCommand. >>>>> >>>> >>>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I and >>>> another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to use >>>> more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to test >>>> steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the buildbot >>>> master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that you can >>>> run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements of the >>>> script. >>>> >>>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need >>>> some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >>>> >>>
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
