https://github.com/paulwalker-arm edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147795
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/NagyDonat approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147766
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/chestnykh edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147905
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/chestnykh updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147905
>From 86dc26e3947d2d53e9b86d700946e7f381f71a7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dmitry Chestnykh
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 10:19:31 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Don't pass sanitizers' rtlibs to linker with `-r`
https://github.com/chestnykh updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147905
>From 83069f67af285bf5df6b2181e1c1763f5d2169ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dmitry Chestnykh
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 10:19:31 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Don't pass sanitizers' rtlibs to linker with `-r`
https://github.com/quic-garvgupt edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147589
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Fznamznon wrote:
Oops new tests are failing.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140282
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cristianassaiante wrote:
@nikic Done! You should be able to see only my changes now.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145059
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cristianassaiante updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145059
>From ab6063493744ef5a1ee92fd249bf8d86b7299fad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cristian Assaiante
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 16:56:23 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] Adding -opt-disable and a test for it
---
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147897
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Haojian Wu
Date: 2025-07-10T10:46:27+02:00
New Revision: a709621cd545b061782b03136286227867b452a6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a709621cd545b061782b03136286227867b452a6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a709621cd545b061782b03136286227867b452a6.diff
LO
chandraghale wrote:
As changes are approved. Merging into the main branch.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145854
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
david-arm wrote:
I tried this out with SPEC2017 on a neoverse-v2 machine and it causes a 6.4%
regression in mcf, so it's still not great to be honest.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144434
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm
https://github.com/chandraghale closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145854
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Urvi Rav
Date: 2025-07-10T13:55:20+05:30
New Revision: 8055c0f380323fe9e1398dcb88276fd6c92ffa5d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8055c0f380323fe9e1398dcb88276fd6c92ffa5d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8055c0f380323fe9e1398dcb88276fd6c92ffa5d.diff
LOG:
@@ -599,11 +599,18 @@ void baremetal::Linker::ConstructJob(Compilation &C,
const JobAction &JA,
const Driver &D = getToolChain().getDriver();
const llvm::Triple::ArchType Arch = TC.getArch();
const llvm::Triple &Triple = getToolChain().getEffectiveTriple();
+ const bool
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147894
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Younan Zhang
Date: 2025-07-10T16:17:34+08:00
New Revision: adcd1bb32a050ced58584882b405f04f42c6009b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/adcd1bb32a050ced58584882b405f04f42c6009b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/adcd1bb32a050ced58584882b405f04f42c6009b.diff
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147894
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/balazske updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147766
From f8dc303029c68762cdbd19b217730192d26f6fca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 16:55:07 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][analyzer] Add C standard stream
https://github.com/tbaederr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147909
>From b23c75ff781875da10baa9e6f033ed5358c0cf02 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 09:21:57 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][bytecode] Allocate Record Fields and ba
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
Records have Program-lifetime, but we used to allocate their fields, bases and
virtual bases using llvm::SmallVector. However, after creating a Record, it
doesn't change and we know all the number of element
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147909
Records have Program-lifetime, but we used to allocate their fields, bases and
virtual bases using llvm::SmallVector. However, after creating a Record, it
doesn't change and we know all the number of elements
https://github.com/chestnykh edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147905
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cristianassaiante wrote:
> Can you please undo the unrelated formatting changes? It's hard to see what
> actually changed, especially inside StandardInstrumentations.cpp.
Sure, sorry about that.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145059
___
cf
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+// REQUIRES: x86-registered-target
+
+// Make sure opt-bisect works through both pass managers
+//
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -O1 %s -mllvm
-opt-disable="inlinerpass,SROAPass,machine code sinking" -mllvm
-opt-disable-verbose -emit-obj -o /dev/
https://github.com/cristianassaiante updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145059
>From ab6063493744ef5a1ee92fd249bf8d86b7299fad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cristian Assaiante
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 16:56:23 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] Adding -opt-disable and a test for it
---
https://github.com/nikic commented:
Can you please undo the unrelated formatting changes? It's hard to see what
actually changed, especially inside StandardInstrumentations.cpp.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145059
___
cfe-commits mailing
@@ -37,6 +42,18 @@ static cl::opt OptBisectVerbose(
cl::desc("Show verbose output when opt-bisect-limit is set"), cl::Hidden,
cl::init(true), cl::Optional);
+static cl::list OptDisablePasses(
+"opt-disable", cl::Hidden, cl::CommaSeparated, cl::Optional,
+cl::cb
https://github.com/cristianassaiante updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145059
>From ab6063493744ef5a1ee92fd249bf8d86b7299fad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cristian Assaiante
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 16:56:23 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] Adding -opt-disable and a test for it
---
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Dmitry Chestnykh (chestnykh)
Changes
If clang is invoked with `-r` (relocatable linking) then we shouldn't construct
sanitizer arguments and then pass sanitizer runtime libs to the linker
GCC simply ignores `-fsanitize=...` if `-r`
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Dmitry Chestnykh (chestnykh)
Changes
If clang is invoked with `-r` (relocatable linking) then we shouldn't construct
sanitizer arguments and then pass sanitizer runtime libs to the linker
GCC simply ignores `-fsanitize=...` if `-r` is also
https://github.com/chestnykh created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147905
If clang is invoked with `-r` (relocatable linking) then we shouldn't construct
sanitizer arguments and then pass sanitizer runtime libs to the linker
GCC simply ignores `-fsanitize=...` if `-r` is also here
cor3ntin wrote:
I'm obviously not qualified to review this but
- Do we need to update https://clang.llvm.org/docs/PointerAuthentication.html ?
- Do we need a changelog entry?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147899
___
cfe-commits mailing li
https://github.com/vbvictor updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147793
>From c4466d677619e6eb8ca65ed943bfb103207527c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Victor Baranov
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 21:00:30 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-tidy][NFC] add '.clang-tidy' config for clang-tidy
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-analysis
Author: Igor Kudrin (igorkudrin)
Changes
This helps to avoid duplicating warnings in cases like:
```
> cat test.cpp
void bar(int);
void foo(const int &);
void test(bool a) {
int v = v;
if (a)
bar(v);
else
foo(v);
}
> clang++.
https://github.com/igorkudrin created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147898
This helps to avoid duplicating warnings in cases like:
```
> cat test.cpp
void bar(int);
void foo(const int &);
void test(bool a) {
int v = v;
if (a)
bar(v);
else
foo(v);
}
> clang++.exe test.cp
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147894
>From 17e42982fc947dccfc724ee6de6cf93fa8de3222 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 13:26:09 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] Fix the template argument collection after
CWG2369
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-analysis
Author: Igor Kudrin (igorkudrin)
Changes
The second parameter is unused since 6080d32194.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147897.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Analysis/UninitializedValues.cpp (+
https://github.com/igorkudrin created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147897
The second parameter is unused since 6080d32194.
>From 748a7ad92ed59854502ff5c3b28dfb18f8e08c79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Igor Kudrin
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 18:49:32 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][NFC] R
https://github.com/xlauko edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147578
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/xlauko edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147578
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2357,6 +2358,56 @@ mlir::LogicalResult
CIRToLLVMVecTernaryOpLowering::matchAndRewrite(
return mlir::success();
}
+mlir::LogicalResult CIRToLLVMComplexAddOpLowering::matchAndRewrite(
+cir::ComplexAddOp op, OpAdaptor adaptor,
+mlir::ConversionPatternRewriter &rewr
https://github.com/xlauko approved this pull request.
lgtm with minot nit
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147578
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1078,15 +1078,19 @@ static bool
CheckFunctionConstraintsWithoutInstantiation(
// template. We need the entire list, since the constraint is completely
// uninstantiated at this point.
- // FIXME: Add TemplateArgs through the 'Innermost' parameter once
- // the refac
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147892
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2025-07-10T08:26:08+02:00
New Revision: d72d84cb0df40019a0a5abaf836b38c8e46e4827
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d72d84cb0df40019a0a5abaf836b38c8e46e4827
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d72d84cb0df40019a0a5abaf836b38c8e46e4827.diff
L
https://github.com/nicovank approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147793
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -909,10 +909,12 @@ static bool areExprsSameMacroOrLiteral(const
BinaryOperator *BinOp,
// Left is macro so right macro too
if (Rsr.getBegin().isMacroID()) {
// Both sides are macros so they are same macro or literal
- const llvm::StringRef L = Lexer::getS
@@ -2661,6 +2661,45 @@ def BitPopcountOp : CIR_BitOpBase<"bit.popcnt",
}];
}
+def BitReverseOp : CIR_BitOpBase<"bit.reverse",
+ CIR_UIntOfWidths<[8, 16, 32, 64]>> {
+ let summary = "Reverse the bit pattern of the operand integer";
+ let desc
HighCommander4 wrote:
> > Do I understand correctly that, as a result of this commit, the SemaTests
> > target no longer exists, and to work on / run the tests that it used to
> > include (such as HeuristicResolverTest.cpp), I have to build the
> > ClangdUnitTests target, which requires buildi
@@ -1078,15 +1078,19 @@ static bool
CheckFunctionConstraintsWithoutInstantiation(
// template. We need the entire list, since the constraint is completely
// uninstantiated at this point.
- // FIXME: Add TemplateArgs through the 'Innermost' parameter once
- // the refac
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147894
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1078,15 +1078,19 @@ static bool
CheckFunctionConstraintsWithoutInstantiation(
// template. We need the entire list, since the constraint is completely
// uninstantiated at this point.
- // FIXME: Add TemplateArgs through the 'Innermost' parameter once
- // the refac
cor3ntin wrote:
Thanks for working on this. Did you do any benchmarks?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147853
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
HighCommander4 wrote:
Given that we haven't heard objections, I think we should proceed with using
resolved paths in `IncludeInserter` as well. It would probably be best to do
that before the clangd 21 release, so that we don't ship a release where two
different features are interpreting the c
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147894
>From 17e42982fc947dccfc724ee6de6cf93fa8de3222 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 13:26:09 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] Fix the template argument collection after CWG2369
Since
kr-2003 wrote:
> We will probably need a test in clang/unittest/Interpreter
Ok. So, replicating clang-repl's way of creating interpreter when
out-of-process should work, right?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147478
___
cfe-commits mailing
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Younan Zhang (zyn0217)
Changes
Since the function template isn't instantiated before constraint checking,
we'll not be able to find the outer template arguments through function
specialization when evaluating the inner constraint that is
https://github.com/zyn0217 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147894
Since the function template isn't instantiated before constraint checking,
we'll not be able to find the outer template arguments through function
specialization when evaluating the inner constraint that is nes
vgvassilev wrote:
We will probably need a test in clang/unittest/Interpreter
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147478
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/PiotrZSL requested changes to this pull request.
I'm not sure if this check changes anything related to performance. Most of
this stuff is optimized, local variables with builtin types will be
optimized-out anyway and types that actually could harm performance cannot be
cons
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2025-07-10T07:33:33+02:00
New Revision: 36cbd43ae8d5a5274ae3193b6383fff2ba9671f4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/36cbd43ae8d5a5274ae3193b6383fff2ba9671f4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/36cbd43ae8d5a5274ae3193b6383fff2ba9671f4.diff
L
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147732
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/tbaederr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147892
>From 8cfa60433b285accc0fb58531ad9ee5c74fe46d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 07:25:15 +0200
Subject: [PAT
https://github.com/vbvictor edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147793
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147892.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/InterpBuiltin.cpp (+103-5)
- (modified) clang/test/Sema/constant_builtins_vector
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147892
None
>From 8cfa60433b285accc0fb58531ad9ee5c74fe46d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 07:25:15 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][bytecode] Implement missing eleme
https://github.com/PiotrZSL approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147793
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Jim Lin
Date: 2025-07-10T13:04:27+08:00
New Revision: 69ff8537296339babc72ae075f3e78a68d1b6816
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/69ff8537296339babc72ae075f3e78a68d1b6816
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/69ff8537296339babc72ae075f3e78a68d1b6816.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/kr-2003 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147478
>From fbe4344831538480be33accd35ef618c6d0e50b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: kr-2003
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 18:55:21 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] pipes for redirection in oop jit
---
.../clang/Interpreter/Remote
@@ -23,10 +23,19 @@
#include
#include
#include
+#ifdef LLVM_ON_UNIX
+#include
+#else
+// Windows/MSVC fallback
+#define STDIN_FILENO 0
+#define STDOUT_FILENO 1
+#define STDERR_FILENO 2
+#endif
kr-2003 wrote:
yes, i don't think we need these now
https://gi
https://github.com/darkbuck closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147209
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: darkbuck
Date: 2025-07-09T23:26:15-04:00
New Revision: 378e9bb7e06c67d8235a8cb5bfb325b63d2ba319
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/378e9bb7e06c67d8235a8cb5bfb325b63d2ba319
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/378e9bb7e06c67d8235a8cb5bfb325b63d2ba319.diff
LOG:
yronglin wrote:
> LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `sanitizer-aarch64-linux`
> running on `sanitizer-buildbot7` while building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
>
> Full details are available at:
> https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/51/builds/19520
>
> Here is the relevan
kkwli wrote:
> LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
> `ppc64le-flang-rhel-clang` running on `ppc64le-flang-rhel-test` while
> building `clang,flang` at step 5 "build-unified-tree".
>
> Full details are available at:
> https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/157/builds/33205
>
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
-target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
+target triple = "x86_64-unknown--"
MaskRay wrote:
Yes, they can be omitted in the IR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/12387
https://github.com/farzonl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147342
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+; RUN: llc -O0 -mtriple=spirv-unknown-vulkan %s -o - | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: %if spirv-tools %{ llc -O0 -mtriple=spirv64-unknown-unknown %s -o -
-filetype=obj | spirv-val %}
farzonl wrote:
There is no spirv64 target if you want to use the glsl e
@@ -1061,15 +1061,36 @@ BuildDeductionGuideForTypeAlias(Sema &SemaRef,
SmallVector DeduceResults(
F->getTemplateParameters()->size());
+ // We don't have to deduce against the alias template specialization,
+ // if the source template is a synthesized alias deduction
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `sanitizer-aarch64-linux`
running on `sanitizer-buildbot7` while building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/51/builds/19520
Here is the relevant piece of the
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
The size of the patch is too big to review. And personally I don't have such a
time to review it recently. Also from the community's perspective, the
maintainablity of large patches is questionable.
I think, you can achieve it with another direction. Instead of adding these
sivadeilra wrote:
> For the cases involving noreturn functions, can we emit int3 instead of nop?
Sure. I've implemented that, verified that tests pass, and updated the PR. I
also added coverage for this to `noreturn-call-win64.ll`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144745
___
https://github.com/shafik commented:
Seems like this should have a release note?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146976
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/sivadeilra updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144745
>From f7c634b074a51b1564137bbcf60904c5dbdfefc0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arlie Davis
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 12:45:34 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Fix IP2State tables
style: revert one change
Adjust tests
yronglin wrote:
Congratulations, the first LLVM PR has landed!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145164
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@mrcvtl Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the
LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a
problem with a build,
https://github.com/yronglin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145164
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Marco Vitale
Date: 2025-07-10T09:57:07+08:00
New Revision: c86c815fc57c098ba14576fe2bb189da1dfc820d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c86c815fc57c098ba14576fe2bb189da1dfc820d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c86c815fc57c098ba14576fe2bb189da1dfc820d.diff
https://github.com/HaohaiWen updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123870
>From 7c531922f20bf284a5cd83b20e94cb624ef031d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Haohai Wen
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 15:29:33 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [COFF] Preserve UniqueID used to create MCSectionCOFF
This Un
Author: Jim Lin
Date: 2025-07-10T09:13:22+08:00
New Revision: 2eab6f9bb2b3dd0cf05021939accca75cfb79994
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2eab6f9bb2b3dd0cf05021939accca75cfb79994
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2eab6f9bb2b3dd0cf05021939accca75cfb79994.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/tclin914 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147767
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/b0gdnv updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147853
>From cf6278f92b32106a406aab92f66d66ce992cc04d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bogdan Vetrenko
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 02:30:27 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Use SmallString in CommentBriefParser to eliminate
per
https://github.com/b0gdnv updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147853
>From cf6278f92b32106a406aab92f66d66ce992cc04d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bogdan Vetrenko
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 02:30:27 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Use SmallString in CommentBriefParser to eliminate
per
@@ -70,6 +70,16 @@ Code completion
Code actions
+- New ``clangd`` code action: "Override pure virtual methods". When invoked on
a
+ class definition, this action automatically generates C++ ``override``
+ declarations for all pure virtual methods inherited from
@@ -70,6 +70,16 @@ Code completion
Code actions
+- New ``clangd`` code action: "Override pure virtual methods". When invoked on
a
marcogmaia wrote:
Agreed. Dropped.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139348
__
https://github.com/marcogmaia updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139348
>From 76503bd8f5618b710e2909d1303de5d34723 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marco Maia
Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 00:48:39 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 01/14] [clangd] Add tweak to add pure virtual overrides
---
...
@@ -1088,6 +1088,9 @@ void CXXNameMangler::mangleNameWithAbiTags(GlobalDecl GD,
return;
}
+ while (DC->isRequiresExprBody())
+DC = DC->getParent();
zyn0217 wrote:
We had a similar while loop in TransformLambdaExpr, is that still needed?
Also I was
https://github.com/b0gdnv updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147853
>From 1bbbe10c7e6d75f43003b0e26b7593808f080bb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bogdan Vetrenko
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 02:30:27 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Use SmallString in CommentBriefParser to eliminate
per
sivadeilra wrote:
That was easier than expected -- thanks again, @efriedma-quic . I've updated
the PR. I've also avoided adding NOPs after tail calls, which were happening
in my first version of this. There's never a need for NOP padding after
TAILJMP* because there won't be a return addres
1 - 100 of 157522 matches
Mail list logo
