jeremyd2019 wrote:

Thanks!  This was on my mental TODO list but I haven't gotten back to looking 
at it.  When I was thinking about this, I was thinking about modifying the 
MinGW linker with a couple of virtual functions and deriving from it for a 
Cygwin linker, to avoid so much code duplication.  Maybe @mstorsjo can provide 
an opinion here?

Also, the cygwin.cpp test was based on hurd.cpp, I'm thinking more of those 
tests are relevant now.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147960
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to