r.
>
> I think this is great news, and it will generate great PR for Calligra soon
> after our release.
>
> My question now is: Is there any reason why accepting this would be a bad
> idea?
Personally I find this excellent news, and I cannot imagine any good
reason for not accept
[1] http://www.atlassian.com/software/fisheye/
--
Mark Kretschmann
Amarok Developer, Software Engineer at KO GmbH
Fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
http://amarok.kde.org - http://fsfe.org - http://kogmbh.com
___
calligra-devel mailing lis
tac tail tailf talk tar taskset
>> > t gives 112 alternatives
>> >
>> > - It feels good :-)
>> > Yeah, this is very subjective, of course.
>>
>> I agree with the intention. Since you mentioned the tab completion,
>>
eloper (for instance with gsoc) on the subject.
>
> In any case, if you like the idea, I will go and add it to our wiki.
Might work, but I would really recommend to consult our KDE Usability team.
They are the experts, and they might just have a good idea, and they
are able to judge this much be
grawords name', or the user can tell me 'I've got nice error
> message window saying that calligrawords crashed'.
I think Jaroslaw is raising a good point here...
--
Mark Kretschmann
Amarok Developer, Software Engineer at KO GmbH
Fello
:
> tabs tac tail tailf talk tar taskset
> t gives 112 alternatives
>
> - It feels good :-)
> Yeah, this is very subjective, of course.
After reading this whole thread, and especially what Jaroslaw wrote, I
would recommend going with:
* calligrawords
