On Mittwoch, 15. Dezember 2021 11:02:51 CEST Dag wrote:
> tirsdag den 14. december 2021 12.08.46 CET skrev Pierre:
> > On Monday, December 13, 2021 8:28:44 AM CET Dag wrote:
> >> @pierre:
> >> If I'm not mistaken you are planning a new release soon?
> >> I cannot see that you have created a release
tirsdag den 14. december 2021 12.08.46 CET skrev Pierre:
On Monday, December 13, 2021 8:28:44 AM CET Dag wrote:
@pierre:
If I'm not mistaken you are planning a new release soon?
I cannot see that you have created a release branch, so presumely string-
and feature freeze are in effect?
Do you hav
On Monday, December 13, 2021 8:28:44 AM CET Dag wrote:
> @pierre:
> If I'm not mistaken you are planning a new release soon?
> I cannot see that you have created a release branch, so presumely string-
> and feature freeze are in effect?
> Do you have a target date in mind?
>
> Also I have created
Boudewijn Rempt skrev den 2018-01-31 14:00:
On Wednesday, 31 January 2018 13:53:46 CET Dan Leinir Turthra Jensen
wrote:
On Wednesday, 31 January 2018 11:41:03 GMT Dag wrote:
> See att file.
> It would be swell if somebody with access could do likewise on
> calligra.org, maybe add more about gemi
On Wednesday, 31 January 2018 13:00:17 GMT Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Wednesday, 31 January 2018 13:53:46 CET Dan Leinir Turthra Jensen wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 31 January 2018 11:41:03 GMT Dag wrote:
> > > See att file.
> > > It would be swell if somebody with access could do likewise on
> > > ca
On Wednesday, 31 January 2018 13:53:46 CET Dan Leinir Turthra Jensen wrote:
> On Wednesday, 31 January 2018 11:41:03 GMT Dag wrote:
> > See att file.
> > It would be swell if somebody with access could do likewise on
> > calligra.org, maybe add more about gemini.
>
> Sorry about not sending it o
Thanks Dag - I'll add link to calligra announcement once it's publishes, on
the KEXI release page.
On 31 January 2018 at 13:53, Dan Leinir Turthra Jensen
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 31 January 2018 11:41:03 GMT Dag wrote:
> > See att file.
> > It would be swell if somebody with access could do likewi
On Wednesday, 31 January 2018 11:41:03 GMT Dag wrote:
> See att file.
> It would be swell if somebody with access could do likewise on
> calligra.org, maybe add more about gemini.
Sorry about not sending it on Monday as promised, a range of things ended up
distracting me quite severely. But, i'
Sure, understood.
On 6 December 2017 at 13:31, Dag wrote:
> Jaroslaw Staniek skrev den 2017-12-05 11:42:
>
>> Nice to hear this, Dag.
>> For the record, next 30 days is also estimated time for Kexi &
>> Frameworks 3.1 release.
>> There are Plan -> Frameworks dependencies, right?
>>
> Yes and no
Jaroslaw Staniek skrev den 2017-12-05 11:42:
Nice to hear this, Dag.
For the record, next 30 days is also estimated time for Kexi &
Frameworks 3.1 release.
There are Plan -> Frameworks dependencies, right?
Yes and no :)
If it is ready, I'll include it, if not it can wait for a later release.
Nice to hear this, Dag.
For the record, next 30 days is also estimated time for Kexi & Frameworks
3.1 release.
There are Plan -> Frameworks dependencies, right?
On 5 December 2017 at 10:34, Dag wrote:
> Hi, I would like to get Plan out soonish, and it would be nice to also
> include gemini along
On Tuesday, 5 December 2017 09:34:31 GMT Dag wrote:
> Hi, I would like to get Plan out soonish, and it would be nice to also
> include gemini along with words, sheets and karbon if it is ready for
> consumption.
>
> I suggest January 25 for final release and a beta December 15.
i was, in fact,
Tarball now on download.kde.org and packagers notified.
Could somebody with karma prepare an announcement for Friday (or the
weekend)?
Created new calligra/3.0 branch so master now open for new features.
Please backport (important) bugfixes in case we need a 3.0.2 release.
---
Cheers,
Dag
Turns out I ma away the next week,
so if somebody does not take it the last steps,
release will be delayed...
---
Cheers,
Dag
Compiled a list fixes, please add if I missed something.
General
---
Fix crash in move command when using arrow keys
Respect container boundaries when moving shapes by arrow keys
Remove shape manipulation handles when the tool is deactivated
Always display shapes in the the same order in t
The usual way to pre-release them is to upload them to the same place
as normal but keep permissions non-public so they don't end up on
download.kde.org but are accessible to packagers.
Jonathan
On 20 March 2017 at 13:30, Dag wrote:
> Ok, git tagged v3.0.1 and tarball created.
>
> Files can be
Ok, git tagged v3.0.1 and tarball created.
Files can be found here:
https://share.kde.org/index.php/s/yanrJWiQFB3rrvc
My public key is here:
https://share.kde.org/index.php/s/pYwk5c7UNcXGYfP
Please test.
Upload etc planned for next week.
Cheers,
Dag
Ok, we are in string freeze.
Tarballs planned for monday 20. if translators do not bulge.
Nothing new from my end, so please go ahead
-Original Message-
From: calligra-devel [mailto:calligra-devel-boun...@kde.org] On Behalf Of
Dag
Sent: 10. marts 2017 13:03
To: calligra-devel@kde.org
Subject: Release 3.0.1
Hi, should we make a bug fix release soon?
A few bugs has been fixed,
Friedrich W. H. Kossebau skrev den 2016-11-25 15:00:
Hi Dag,
Translators prefer to be notified about upcoming release (which also
means
frozen strings then) at least one week or better more. So if you
schedule the
tarball creation for, say, December 4th and tell them immediately, that
might
On Fri, 25 Nov 2016, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> Hi Dag,
>
> Am Freitag, 25. November 2016, 12:14:05 CET schrieb Dag:
> > Hi, everybody
> > We are closing in on release I don't think I know of more than getting
> > the migration stuff in.
> > Has anybody anything else they think has to be d
Hi Dag,
Am Freitag, 25. November 2016, 12:14:05 CET schrieb Dag:
> Hi, everybody
> We are closing in on release I don't think I know of more than getting
> the migration stuff in.
> Has anybody anything else they think has to be done before release?
>
> Boudewijn, is there anything we need to pre
On 25 November 2016 at 12:14, Dag wrote:
> Hi, everybody
> We are closing in on release I don't think I know of more than getting the
> migration stuff in.
> Has anybody anything else they think has to be done before release?
>
Good!
If this helps in any way, Kexi uses kde:releaseme and this is
I don't think there's any reason why this should be necessary for
distros. A simple message to say "don't build krita from Calligra,
build it from the standalone krita 3 now" should be enough. Of course
a Calligra 3 ported to KF5 would also focus attention.
Jonathan
On 2 November 2016 at 13:36
Okay, I'm doing win/osx builds, and I've asked leinir for obsd buils.
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015, Dmitry Kazakov wrote:
The blocker is fixed now. I'm going to restart Krita Lime now.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
Monthly releases are awesome and we're getting fixes and
The blocker is fixed now. I'm going to restart Krita Lime now.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> Monthly releases are awesome and we're getting fixes and features in
> users' hands much faster now, but there's a price, and that's testing times.
>
> Deevad just caught a bug
Hi, Andrius!
This patch is looks ok for me, but I'd really like Friedrich to look at it
(I'm not good at cmake syntax myself). I'll try to ask him tonight and then
we'll shipit the patch :)
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Andrius da Costa Ribas <
andrius...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We're going to a
We're going to add Calligra 2.8 package to the KDE 4.12 release on
KDE-windows installer ... Specifically for Krita it would be nice to have
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115110/ reviewed, as it allows the MinGW
build (this is currently being applied as a patch for 2.8-beta1 tarball on
emerge).
hi ! good list ;
About bug 330400 on "would be also nice to fix" list; (
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=330400 ) , the fix is in the bug
report ( not a patch , just written ).
I would like to add ( if possible ) to the list , those bugs affecting
brushes and rendering :
Bug 329026 "Weird br
On Saturday, August 10, 2013 06:39:10 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> On Friday 09 August 2013 18:10:16 Inge Wallin wrote:
> > I tried to look at the release plan for 2.7 to prepare
>
> for the bugfix
>
> > announcements but there wasn't any[1].
> >
> > Cyrille, can you make a proposed release pl
On Friday 09 August 2013 18:10:16 Inge Wallin wrote:
> I tried to look at the release plan for 2.7 to prepare
for the bugfix
> announcements but there wasn't any[1].
>
> Cyrille, can you make a proposed release plan?
done.
> [1]
http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Schedules/2.7/Release
_Plan
--
Kexi received numerous improvements in its CSV Import tool.
(I'll add link to kexi changelog later today)
On 29 August 2012 14:09, Inge Wallin wrote:
> Tonight is the release of 2.5.1. Is there anything that should emphasize
> especially? Or should it just be "contains important bugfixes, plea
The most important bugfix in krita is that the text tool works again, that
might merit a separate mention.
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012, Inge Wallin wrote:
Tonight is the release of 2.5.1. Is there anything that should emphasize
especially? Or should it just be "contains important bugfixes, please
up
On Friday, August 10, 2012 14:41:36 Brijesh Patel wrote:
> +1 if possible, after this weekend :)
I am not so sure but anyway the announcement is written now and just awaits
publishing.
If we want to improve it a bit before pushing the button, I could use some
info about Calligra Active and I a
On 10 August 2012 13:30, Inge Wallin wrote:
> I have most of the text written already and I will polish it during the trip
> so it will be finished when I am back. However there are two things that I
> would like some help with:
>
> - Screenshots as usual (send to me in a mail, please)
> - Fine
+1 if possible, after this weekend :)
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 5:04 PM, C. Boemann wrote:
>
>> On Friday 10 August 2012 13:30:27 Inge Wallin wrote:
>> > Tonight we will announce Calligra 2.5. It should have been yesterday
>> > already
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 5:04 PM, C. Boemann wrote:
> On Friday 10 August 2012 13:30:27 Inge Wallin wrote:
> > Tonight we will announce Calligra 2.5. It should have been yesterday
> > already but my internet at home had some problems for almost 2 days so I
> > couldn't do any work on it. But tonig
On Friday 10 August 2012 13:30:27 Inge Wallin wrote:
> Tonight we will announce Calligra 2.5. It should have been yesterday
> already but my internet at home had some problems for almost 2 days so I
> couldn't do any work on it. But tonight is the night.
>
> However, I will be offline during early
Hello,
> There is a bug in qt4.8 that makes textediting crash. And it's not really
> practical to workaround it in Calligra.
Is it an assert or is it a real crash?
> More specifically qt4.8 crashes whenever you eg cursor->setPosition or
> editing that moves the cursor position.
>
> Unless you w
On Friday 09 March 2012 23:25:10 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 9 March 2012 16:48, C. Boemann wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > There is a bug in qt4.8 that makes textediting crash. And it's not really
> > practical to workaround it in Calligra.
> >
> > More specifically qt4.8 crashes whenever you eg cursor-
On 9 March 2012 16:48, C. Boemann wrote:
> Hi
>
> There is a bug in qt4.8 that makes textediting crash. And it's not really
> practical to workaround it in Calligra.
>
> More specifically qt4.8 crashes whenever you eg cursor->setPosition or editing
> that moves the cursor position.
>
> Unless you
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 4:48 PM, C. Boemann wrote:
> Hi
>
> There is a bug in qt4.8 that makes textediting crash. And it's not really
> practical to workaround it in Calligra.
>
> More specifically qt4.8 crashes whenever you eg cursor->setPosition or
> editing
> that moves the cursor position.
>
>
On Friday 24 February 2012 18:08:37 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> Here is my suggestion:
>
> * merge the branch ASAP, like this week-end
> * tag RC/branch on Friday 2nd
>
> That way it give use a small week to fully tests the changes before the RC.
It has my support
__
Here is my suggestion:
* merge the branch ASAP, like this week-end
* tag RC/branch on Friday 2nd
That way it give use a small week to fully tests the changes before the RC.
--
Cyrille Berger Skott
___
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
On Thursday 23 February 2012 11:57:56 Elvis Stansvik wrote:
> 2012/2/23 C. Boemann :
> > Hi all
> >
> > So the minisprint on undo in Words is over and we had success. I'm
> > requesting merge of our branch but more on that below.
> >
> > Assuming we merge within a day or two, I propose we create
On 23 February 2012 10:27, C. Boemann wrote:
> Hi all
>
> So the minisprint on undo in Words is over and we had success. I'm requesting
> merge of our branch but more on that below.
>
> Assuming we merge within a day or two, I propose we create a release branch
> one of the next days. And on next
On Thursday, February 23, 2012 10:27:38 C. Boemann wrote:
> Hi all
>
> So the minisprint on undo in Words is over and we had success. I'm
> requesting merge of our branch but more on that below.
Good to hear.
> Assuming we merge within a day or two, I propose we create a release branch
> one of
2012/2/23 C. Boemann :
> Hi all
>
> So the minisprint on undo in Words is over and we had success. I'm requesting
> merge of our branch but more on that below.
>
> Assuming we merge within a day or two, I propose we create a release branch
> one of the next days. And on next friday we tag an RC fro
2012/2/23 Pierre Stirnweiss :
> When I checked out the branch yesterday evening, the KoTextEditor_format.cpp
> file was missing. This also meant that I couldn't test the trick for the
> insertTable method. It wouldn't compile.
It was a small miss by boemann. It's been added now.
Elvis
>
> Pierre
yes i commited the missing file late last night
On Thursday 23 February 2012 10:48:55 Pierre Stirnweiss wrote:
> When I checked out the branch yesterday evening, the
> KoTextEditor_format.cpp file was missing. This also meant that I couldn't
> test the trick for the insertTable method. It wouldn't
When I checked out the branch yesterday evening, the
KoTextEditor_format.cpp file was missing. This also meant that I couldn't
test the trick for the insertTable method. It wouldn't compile.
Pierre
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:27 AM, C. Boemann wrote:
> Hi all
>
> So the minisprint on undo in Wor
done
On Saturday 29 October 2011 16:54:05 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you add the "release_blocker" keyword to them ? (so that they show on
> queries, and especially on quality.calligra-suite.org)
>
> On Thursday 27 October 2011, C. Boemann wrote:
> > Hi Words developers
> >
> > W
Hi,
Can you add the "release_blocker" keyword to them ? (so that they show on
queries, and especially on quality.calligra-suite.org)
On Thursday 27 October 2011, C. Boemann wrote:
> Hi Words developers
>
> We have 8 release blockers. Of those 4 are due to data loss:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show
On Monday, September 12, 2011 21:01:44 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Monday 12 September 2011 Sep, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Monday 12 September 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > > * tagging/packing/releasing. I haven't seen a tag pushed yet, but I
> > > might have missed it. Are
On Monday, September 12, 2011 12:33:41 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just to make sure everything is coordinated... I guess we need the
> following:
>
> * announcement created from the input from the maintainers. We've heard
> about Krita, Words and Kexi. Come on guys -- let's have the good ne
On Monday 12 September 2011 Sep, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> Tag is set on 0b24623390b9a8d2b4c89fc7c4f50eff639bf1d2.
Yay for the tag! I'm really a bit excited about this -- first step towards the
first for-real Calligra release and all that!
--
Boudewijn Rempt
http://www.valdyas.org, http://
On Monday 12 September 2011 Sep, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday 12 September 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > * tagging/packing/releasing. I haven't seen a tag pushed yet, but I might
> > have missed it. Are we still good for a release on the 14th? I'm
> > travelling, so I cannot
On Monday 12 September 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> At least I could try to deliver banner as in the koffice 1.6 times. Of
> that's OK (Cyrille?) tell me please what should be the image size.
That would be 940x290.
--
Cyrille Berger Skott
___
callig
Hi,
On Monday 12 September 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> * tagging/packing/releasing. I haven't seen a tag pushed yet, but I might
> have missed it. Are we still good for a release on the 14th? I'm
> travelling, so I cannot do a whole lot.
Tag is set on 0b24623390b9a8d2b4c89fc7c4f50eff639bf1d2.
On 12 September 2011 12:33, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> Just to make sure everything is coordinated... I guess we need the following:
>
> * announcement created from the input from the maintainers. We've heard about
> Krita, Words and Kexi.
> Come on guys -- let's have the good news about Plan, Tab
Hi,
Thanks for the email :) Hopefully after this week-end, I will have time and
energy to do the coordination work :) Anyway, I have put todo list and
tentavive schedule on the wiki:
http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Schedules/2.4/Release_Plan#2.3.71
--
Cyrille Berger Skott
__
On Saturday 16 April 2011 Apr, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As decided at the Calligra sprint, Hannah, Boudewijn, Cyrille and Inge have
> sat together to dicuss the snapshot release and what needs to be done for
> that. We wanted to release about three weeks after the sprint. We need help
>
On Saturday 12 February 2011, Alfredo Beaumont wrote:
> Larunbata 12 Otsaila 2011(e)an, Boudewijn Rempt(e)k idatzi zuen:
> > On Saturday 12 February 2011, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have updated our release plan:
> > >
> > > http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Schedules/2.4
Larunbata 12 Otsaila 2011(e)an, Boudewijn Rempt(e)k idatzi zuen:
> On Saturday 12 February 2011, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have updated our release plan:
> >
> > http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Schedules/2.4/Release_Plan
> >
> > Since we want to label our snapshot "stable",
On Saturday 12 February 2011, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have updated our release plan:
>
> http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Schedules/2.4/Release_Plan
>
> Since we want to label our snapshot "stable", what should we do with failing
> unit tests ? Apart from whipping developers un
On 7 February 2011 13:50, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Monday 07 February 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>> On 7 February 2011 11:21, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
>> > On Monday 07 February 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>> >
>> >> Extend the co-installability to the snapshots. What means Calligra not
>>
On Monday 07 February 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 7 February 2011 11:21, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > On Monday 07 February 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> >
> >> Extend the co-installability to the snapshots. What means Calligra not
> >> only can be co-installable with the GroupA-Office but
On 7 February 2011 11:21, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Monday 07 February 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>
>> Extend the co-installability to the snapshots. What means Calligra not
>> only can be co-installable with the GroupA-Office but also with the
>> latest (or any) stable Calligra release. I se
While I agree that coinstability in the same prefix is close to impossible to
achieve, without a lot of work and hacks. I do think that we should do
something to make it possible for a calligra version to be installed in kde's
prefix (ie /usr) and in an other prefix.
--
Cyrille Berger Skott
__
On Monday 07 February 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> Extend the co-installability to the snapshots. What means Calligra not
> only can be co-installable with the GroupA-Office but also with the
> latest (or any) stable Calligra release. I see value in this and the
> effort at the side of packager
+1
I think that with a stable master branch we might very well convert this
snapshots in just normal releases. Pretty much like Google Chrome works.
Anyway, let's not open discussion again, let's see how this works first.
Cheers
Astelehena 07 Otsaila 2011(e)an, Yue Liu(e)k idatzi zuen:
> agre
On Monday 07 February 2011, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> On Monday 07 February 2011, C. Boemann wrote:
> > On Monday 07 February 2011 10:10:13 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > > The discussion seemed to have petered out without a real decision, so
> > >
> > > here's a really concrete proposal:
> > >
>
On 7 February 2011 10:10, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> The discussion seemed to have petered out without a real decision, so here's
> a really concrete proposal:
>
> * Let's make a monthly calligra snapshot that's advertised as reasonably
> stable and full of you-need-to-try-this goodness until we a
On Monday 07 February 2011, C. Boemann wrote:
> On Monday 07 February 2011 10:10:13 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > The discussion seemed to have petered out without a real decision, so
> >
> > here's a really concrete proposal:
> >
> >
> > * Let's make a monthly calligra snapshot that's advertised as
agreed.
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:56 PM, C. Boemann wrote:
> On Monday 07 February 2011 10:10:13 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
>> The discussion seemed to have petered out without a real decision, so
>> here's a really concrete proposal:
>>
>> * Let's make a monthly calligra snapshot that's advertised as
On Monday 07 February 2011 10:10:13 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> The discussion seemed to have petered out without a real decision, so
> here's a really concrete proposal:
>
> * Let's make a monthly calligra snapshot that's advertised as reasonably
> stable and full of you-need-to-try-this goodness un
The discussion seemed to have petered out without a real decision, so here's a
really concrete proposal:
* Let's make a monthly calligra snapshot that's advertised as reasonably stable
and full of you-need-to-try-this goodness until we are at a point where we can
start a real release schedule
On Wednesday 02 February 2011, todd rme wrote:
> That is fine once we have an initial "main" release, but in my opinion
> you made a clear commitment to support koffice 2.3 until then. I
> think abandoning koffice 2.3 now would be a P.R. disaster. First, it
> could easily be portrayed as spiteful
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:31 AM, Cyrille Berger Skott
wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Inge Wallin wrote:
>> But as a user, I expect to be able to update to either a new version with
>> new features and possibly also new bugs or a more stable release with no
>> new features but also definit
On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Inge Wallin wrote:
> Do you have any thoughts
> on when to interrupt this scheme and go to X releases per year (4 is not
> yet decided)?
When Calligra is user-ready :) So in about 6 to 8 monthes.
--
Cyrille Berger Skott
2011/2/2 C. Boemann :
> On Wednesday 02 February 2011 10:34:30 Pierre Stirnweiss wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Inge Wallin wrote:
>> > > Do you plan to make real, i.e. not previews, of Krita in the mean time?
>> >
>> > The
>>
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011, Inge Wallin wrote:
> While this is true, the Linux distros work the same way. I think we should
> ask
> the packagers first what they think of the idea.
I think packaging is mostly automated these days. It'll be possible, though,
that
one or more of the distros will pick a
On Wednesday, February 02, 2011 11:26:10 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Inge Wallin wrote:
> > I may have misunderstood, but if I understood correctly I'm very sorry to
> > have to say that I hate this. The reason is that it is a
> > developer-centric way to work rather tha
On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Inge Wallin wrote:
> But as a user, I expect to be able to update to either a new version with
> new features and possibly also new bugs or a more stable release with no
> new features but also definitely less bugs.
It is temporary. Until we have reached a user ready
On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Inge Wallin wrote:
> I may have misunderstood, but if I understood correctly I'm very sorry to
> have
> to say that I hate this. The reason is that it is a developer-centric way to
> work rather than a user-centric.
>
> I'm sure it will be very ego-boosting for u
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 11:08:56 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 February 2011, C. Boemann wrote:
> > Calligra Suite 2.3 Stable snapshot 201103
>
> For packagers we would need a proper version number. One that is lower than
> the next stable, and bigger than the previous one.
s
On Wednesday 02 February 2011, C. Boemann wrote:
> Calligra Suite 2.3 Stable snapshot 201103
For packagers we would need a proper version number. One that is lower than
the next stable, and bigger than the previous one.
--
Cyrille Berger Skott
___
call
On Wednesday, February 02, 2011 10:34:30 Pierre Stirnweiss wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Inge Wallin wrote:
> > > Do you plan to make real, i.e. not previews, of Krita in the mean time?
> >
> > The
> >
> > > reason I ask is th
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 10:47:40 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 February 2011, C. Boemann wrote:
> > I like this very much, both now and as the future way of releasing.
> >
> > i would assume our first release would then be:
> >
> > Calligra Suite 2.3 Stable snapshot 201103
>
> I
On Wednesday 02 February 2011, C. Boemann wrote:
> I like this very much, both now and as the future way of releasing.
>
> i would assume our first release would then be:
>
> Calligra Suite 2.3 Stable snapshot 201103
>
I was rather hoping for a February release...
--
Boudewijn Rempt | http:/
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 10:34:30 Pierre Stirnweiss wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Inge Wallin wrote:
> > > Do you plan to make real, i.e. not previews, of Krita in the mean time?
> >
> > The
> >
> > > reason I ask is that
On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Pierre Stirnweiss wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Inge Wallin wrote:
> >
> > > Do you plan to make real, i.e. not previews, of Krita in the mean time?
> > The
> > > reason I ask is that I wonder w
On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > We have to plan branching rules for this, or is tagging the master our
> > way (+feature branches)? Whatever works for you.
> I wanted to discuss this at the sprint :)
:-). But t
On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> Are you sure about the deps? I am fairly sure that we still compile against
> Qt 4.6 and KDE 4.5 -- maybe even 4.4.
yes it does. The build bot compiles calligra with Qt4.6 and KDE 4.4. (so does
some debian users :) ).
--
Cyrille Berger Sko
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Inge Wallin wrote:
>
> > Do you plan to make real, i.e. not previews, of Krita in the mean time?
> The
> > reason I ask is that I wonder which Linux distros are going to package
> the
> > previews and how.
>
On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> We have to plan branching rules for this, or is tagging the master our
> way (+feature branches)? Whatever works for you.
I wanted to discuss this at the sprint :)
My idea was to have feature branches. And trying to have feature branches hav
On 2 February 2011 10:12, Inge Wallin wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 02, 2011 09:35:00 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> With the removal of kexi, krita and kplato from the koffice.org website,
>> I'm reluctant to continue having krita released as part of KOffice 2.3.x.
>> In fact, even though
On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 2 February 2011 10:05, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> > Only problem is that it would not really help users that would most likely
> > have to be satisfied with koffice 2.3 until we release something labeled
> > stable.
>
> I also see som
On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Inge Wallin wrote:
> Do you plan to make real, i.e. not previews, of Krita in the mean time? The
> reason I ask is that I wonder which Linux distros are going to package the
> previews and how.
I think that (after a bit of cleanup), Calligra master contains a sta
On 2 February 2011 10:05, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> Only problem is that it would not really help users that would most likely
> have to be satisfied with koffice 2.3 until we release something labeled
> stable.
I also see something related to the recent thread about minimal Qt
dependencies.
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
