On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 2 February 2011 10:05, Cyrille Berger Skott <cber...@cberger.net> wrote: > > Only problem is that it would not really help users that would most likely > > have to be satisfied with koffice 2.3 until we release something labeled > > stable. > > I also see something related to the recent thread about minimal Qt > dependencies. > IIRC 2.3 has really lower dependencies, so perhaps in order to become > drop-in replacement we would better off if we allow for very similar > dependencies. Thus distros would be able to deliver as many backports > as possible. But I am not even sure about that because the new app > names, lib names and package name(s) require rather major leap (from > the pacakger's POV), what typically does not qualify as a backport.
Are you sure about the deps? I am fairly sure that we still compile against Qt 4.6 and KDE 4.5 -- maybe even 4.4. -- Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
