On 2 February 2011 10:05, Cyrille Berger Skott <cber...@cberger.net> wrote: > Only problem is that it would not really help users that would most likely > have to be satisfied with koffice 2.3 until we release something labeled > stable.
I also see something related to the recent thread about minimal Qt dependencies. IIRC 2.3 has really lower dependencies, so perhaps in order to become drop-in replacement we would better off if we allow for very similar dependencies. Thus distros would be able to deliver as many backports as possible. But I am not even sure about that because the new app names, lib names and package name(s) require rather major leap (from the pacakger's POV), what typically does not qualify as a backport. -- regards / pozdrawiam, Jaroslaw Staniek http://www.linkedin.com/in/jstaniek Kexi & Calligra (kexi-project.org, identi.ca/kexi, calligra-suite.org) KDE Software Development Platform on MS Windows (windows.kde.org) _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
