On Thursday, December 08, 2011 18:41:03 Inge Wallin wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 07, 2011 20:40:11 Markus Slopianka wrote:
> > Hi.
> > Since bad weather forced me to stay at home instead of going exercising,
> > I'm already done with what was originally planned to be a mere set of
> > very short
On Thursday, December 08, 2011 15:29:17 Markus Slopianka wrote:
> > I'm not in the least interested in fine semantic distinctions and will
> > continue using KDE5 as a convenient shorthand for the version of the
> > libraries that are compatible with Qt5 and that are incompatible with our
> > curre
On Wednesday, December 07, 2011 20:40:11 Markus Slopianka wrote:
> Hi.
> Since bad weather forced me to stay at home instead of going exercising,
> I'm already done with what was originally planned to be a mere set of very
> short guidelines for the names Calligra and Calligra Suite:
> http://commu
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 8 December 2011 15:29, Markus Slopianka wrote:
> >> I'm not in the least interested in fine semantic distinctions and will
> >> continue using KDE5 as a convenient shorthand for the version of the
> >> libraries that are compatible wit
On 8 December 2011 15:29, Markus Slopianka wrote:
>> I'm not in the least interested in fine semantic distinctions and will
>> continue using KDE5 as a convenient shorthand for the version of the
>> libraries that are compatible with Qt5 and that are incompatible with our
>> current source code,
>
> I'm not in the least interested in fine semantic distinctions and will
> continue using KDE5 as a convenient shorthand for the version of the
> libraries that are compatible with Qt5 and that are incompatible with our
> current source code,
In which universe is "KDE5" shorter than KF5?
> irreg
On Thursday 08 December 2011 Dec, Markus Slopianka wrote:
> On Donnerstag 08 Dezember 2011 14:59:20 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> > On Thursday 08 December 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > > The attractive thing, to my mind, is that porting to KDE 5 is more like
> > > porting to Qt... Instead of us
On Donnerstag 08 Dezember 2011 14:59:20 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> On Thursday 08 December 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > The attractive thing, to my mind, is that porting to KDE 5 is more like
> > porting to Qt... Instead of using KFileDialog, we should use QFileDialog,
> > instead of KMessag
On Thursday 08 December 2011 Dec, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> On Thursday 08 December 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > On Thursday 08 December 2011 Dec, Sven Langkamp wrote:
> > > Even if KF 5 is released in summer 2012, it won't be in major
> > > distributions before october.
> > >
> > > I thin
On 8 December 2011 14:59, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> On Thursday 08 December 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
>> On Thursday 08 December 2011 Dec, Sven Langkamp wrote:
>> > Even if KF 5 is released in summer 2012, it won't be in major
>> > distributions before october.
>> >
>> > I think the most im
On Thursday 08 December 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Thursday 08 December 2011 Dec, Sven Langkamp wrote:
> > Even if KF 5 is released in summer 2012, it won't be in major
> > distributions before october.
> >
> > I think the most important thing that we learned from the KDE 4 porting
> > it's
On Thursday 08 December 2011 Dec, Sven Langkamp wrote:
> Even if KF 5 is released in summer 2012, it won't be in major distributions
> before october.
>
> I think the most important thing that we learned from the KDE 4 porting
> it's that you better start late with the porting. That means that I
>
Hi,
Nice start. Since for a press kit, we want to have the positive aspect, I
would remove the reference to the KOffice split. It is something that would
belong to an history section of Calligra, that it is why it is ok to mention
it in the version section.
On Wednesday 07 December 2011, Marku
On Wednesday 07 December 2011, Markus Slopianka wrote:
> Anyhow, Calligra (and KOffice before) isn't really the most successful
> project to keep roadmaps and schedules.
That is because we didn't have the tool so far (ie git), and we are small
enough project to accept delay when something breaks
On Thursday 08 December 2011, Markus Slopianka wrote:
> > I think the most important thing that we learned from the KDE 4 porting
>
> I don't know how many times that needs to be repeated but KF5 isn't going
> to be a huge rewrite. It's still just mostly 4.x without deprecated stuff
> and more mo
On 8 December 2011 00:23, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 7 December 2011 23:53, Markus Slopianka wrote:
>> On Mittwoch 07 Dezember 2011 22:54:11 C. Boemann wrote:
>>> I think it looks generally very nice. The part about version 3.0 is
>>> incorrect however. We plan for at least 2.5 and 2.6 before 3
On Donnerstag 08 Dezember 2011 01:54:40 Sven Langkamp wrote:
> Even if KF 5 is released in summer 2012, it won't be in major distributions
> before october.
Yes. With 2.6 targeted around that time I'd make perfect sense to switch to Qt5
then.
> I think the most important thing that we learned
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 11:53 PM, Markus Slopianka wrote:
> On Mittwoch 07 Dezember 2011 22:54:11 C. Boemann wrote:
> > I think it looks generally very nice. The part about version 3.0 is
> > incorrect however. We plan for at least 2.5 and 2.6 before 3.0 neither of
> > which will include support fo
I changed the outlook part to include less specifics. I wrote about the switch
to a
4-months cycle and KF5 adoption "at some point".
Better ODF and MSO file support is a given for any new release anyway, so that
can stay
anyhow. ;-)
On Donnerstag 08 Dezember 2011 00:23:34 Jaroslaw Staniek wro
On 7 December 2011 23:53, Markus Slopianka wrote:
> On Mittwoch 07 Dezember 2011 22:54:11 C. Boemann wrote:
>> I think it looks generally very nice. The part about version 3.0 is
>> incorrect however. We plan for at least 2.5 and 2.6 before 3.0 neither of
>> which will include support for new qt o
That sounds more like a dedicated page on TechBase is needed.
I can rephrase the part about Engine to something like "Calligra Engine is in
the process
of becoming ... check techbase.kde.org/... for more detailed info".
Markus
On Mittwoch 07 Dezember 2011 21:46:11 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> I
On Mittwoch 07 Dezember 2011 22:54:11 C. Boemann wrote:
> I think it looks generally very nice. The part about version 3.0 is
> incorrect however. We plan for at least 2.5 and 2.6 before 3.0 neither of
> which will include support for new qt or kde. Our release schedule is
> every 4 months from now
On Wednesday 07 December 2011 20:40:11 Markus Slopianka wrote:
> Hi.
> Since bad weather forced me to stay at home instead of going exercising,
> I'm already done with what was originally planned to be a mere set of very
> short guidelines for the names Calligra and Calligra Suite:
> http://communi
On 7 December 2011 20:40, Markus Slopianka wrote:
> Since bad weather forced me to stay at home instead of going exercising, I'm
> already done
> with what was originally planned to be a mere set of very short guidelines
> for the names
> Calligra and Calligra Suite: http://community.kde.org/Cal
24 matches
Mail list logo
