On Thursday 08 December 2011 Dec, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > On Thursday 08 December 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > On Thursday 08 December 2011 Dec, Sven Langkamp wrote: > > > Even if KF 5 is released in summer 2012, it won't be in major > > > distributions before october. > > > > > > I think the most important thing that we learned from the KDE 4 porting > > > it's that you better start late with the porting. That means that I > > > wouldn't start porting before KDE SC 5.0 is released. Otherwise it just > > > wasting time following a moving target. I think for now it's more > > > important to work towards becoming completely ready, than jumping into > > > another port. > > > > The attractive thing, to my mind, is that porting to KDE 5 is more like > > porting to Qt... Instead of using KFileDialog, we should use QFileDialog, > > instead of KMessageBox, QMessageBox, K/QIcon, K/QAction and so on. That's > > something we can do even after 2.4 is released already.
> hum. But wouldn't that affect the user interraction for people using Calligra > with KDE4 ? I guess so... We basically have three options: * port K->Q for these items and accept that on KDE4, there's different behaviour compared to earlier, but the apps won't break (hopefully). * not port K->Q: we won't support KDE5/Qt5 * ifdef everything: lots more code complexity, hopefully the same behaviour for KDE4 users as for KDE5 users. I'm not so sure that we can manage to support both KDE5/Qt5 and KDE4/Qt4, actually. -- Boudewijn Rempt http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org, http://www.boudewijnrempt.nl _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
